#11 (permalink)  
Old 06-19-2008, 12:48 AM
PhotoNewt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Texas, USA
Posts: 651
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lputman View Post
These are really nice PhotoNewt, so delicate and you've captured that well. They remind me of the tissue paper flowers I made as a child in elementary school.
LOL, these was a convenient subject on the backyard that I used to show DoF for this discussion. Aside from conversion from RAW to JPEG and a little sharpening they are almost straight from camera.

Nothing really special, but thanks.
__________________
~ Newt ~
Canon 5D MkII | Canon 40D | Canon A2 | Canon F-1
EF 16-35mm f/2.8L | EF 24-70mm f/2.8L | EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS
EF 35mm f/1.4L | EF 50mm f/1.4 | EF 85mm f/1.8 | EF 300mm f/2.8L IS
EF-S 60mm f/2.8 MACRO | EF 100mm f/2.8 MACRO
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 06-21-2008, 03:34 AM
n00b 'grapher
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 408
Default

OK, ladies and gentlemen, I put some of the ideas and tips above into practice and came up with some good (at least they are good for my skills) photos. Here are two I am proud of, until I get better at this. I tried to maintain as small an aperture as I could, so I had to go fully manual on these.

Aperture: f/16
Speed: 0.003 (1/320) sec
ISO: 450

I used Photoshop Elements to resize and clean up a bit.

Flickr11

Flickr13

I'd appreciate any critique/comments on the same. I know I have a long distance to go, so I will take any help I can get.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 06-21-2008, 04:17 AM
Major_Small's Avatar
Prime Lens | 1000- 2000 Posts
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,572
Default

I would call those good shots. One more thing to add to this discussion is to keep the effects of diffraction in mind. Anyhoo, is there a reason you needed 1/320sec shutter speed? I wasn't there, so I don't know, but it seems to me that you could probably have squeezed out a lower ISO or smaller aperture.
__________________
Zooomr|Flickr|Big Stock Photo|dreamstime
All work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License unless otherwise noted. (meaning you can edit and repost my images unless I specifically ask you not to)
All post-processing done with The Gimp

Last edited by Major_Small; 06-21-2008 at 04:36 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 06-21-2008, 05:30 AM
n00b 'grapher
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 408
Default

Thanks for the compliments, Major. That article of the effects of diffraction is quite good. However, as the author notes:

Quote:
Even when a camera system is near or just past its diffraction limit, other factors such as focus accuracy, motion blur and imperfect lenses are likely to be more significant. Softening due to diffraction only becomes a limiting factor for total sharpness when using a sturdy tripod, mirror lock-up and a very high quality lens.
Since I am using none of the last three, I guess I should concentrate more on getting the focus right. I am getting there slowly, with tips and help from all you guys here.

Regarding the shutter speed, it was slightly windy and I thought I would use a faster speed to negate the blur effect caused by the wind, especially since my lens does not have VR built into it. I already have shaky hands and putting the wind into the bargain will make life more difficult. I will try this exercise again with a slower speed, smaller aperture, lower ISO combination and post the result here.
__________________
flickr | Picasa | Nikon D90 | Tamron AF 18-270mm Di II VC | Tamron SP AF Di 90mm
Experience is what you get when you don't get what you want.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 06-21-2008, 08:34 AM
Major_Small's Avatar
Prime Lens | 1000- 2000 Posts
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,572
Default

yeah - your logic makes sense. I didn't know if the wind was blowing or what was going on, but when you have a reason to bring up the shutter speed, you have a reason to bring up the shutter speed.
__________________
Zooomr|Flickr|Big Stock Photo|dreamstime
All work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License unless otherwise noted. (meaning you can edit and repost my images unless I specifically ask you not to)
All post-processing done with The Gimp
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 06-21-2008, 01:27 PM
clockdoc's Avatar
Prime Lens | 1000- 2000 Posts
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Alabama
Posts: 2,545
Default

Hi Stryker. You have received some excellent advice from others in the group. Here are a couple of thoughts that have helped me. Try using a monopod (or even a cutoff broomstick) for extra support. You don't need an expensive one with a ball head to get started, A cheap one from Wal-Mart will get you going. I have used a "hiking stick" with good success without even attaching the camera to the screw thread. I turned the plactic locking disc/nut up high enough to cover the screw threads and press the base of the camera on top of the plastic disc. You can also use your free hand as a support base for the camera. Adjust focus (once you get close using auto) by rocking your body in and out as someone else has suggested.
Another thing to try is shooting with your lens at the telephoto end of its range with the camera in Close-up mode. In my D80, this activates only the center focus bracket. By being a bit farther away from the subject you will gain a little more depth of field. Then crop for the best composition.
I think you did a great job on your bee shots! Keep shooting!
__________________
Sincerely,
Lee -clockdoc-
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 06-21-2008, 02:14 PM
New Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 5
Default

Nice shots here. I like #2 though because of the cleaner look. You composed the first one a little too dead center and there are some distracting elements competing with the subject. You nailed it in the second shot though. Nice stuff man!
__________________
Jeff

Whenever I feel blue...I just start breathing again
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 06-21-2008, 04:13 PM
ni2sml's Avatar
Nifty Fifty | 200-500 Posts
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Moneta, VA
Posts: 211
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stryker View Post
I thought I would use a faster speed to negate the blur effect caused by the wind, especially since my lens does not have VR built into it.
Bear in mind that even if you had VR it won't stop subject motion. It'll help reduce the effects of shaky hands if you're handholding, but it won't do anything about the flower being moved around by the wind.

In this case the faster shutter speed is the way to go. Nice shots!
__________________
Modified Olympus C4000Z, Pentax AF500FTZ and Minolta 1800AF flashes.

Flickr. Website. Blog. Twitter.

I am not The Stig.
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 06-22-2008, 04:24 AM
n00b 'grapher
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 408
Default

Thanks again guys!

@clockdoc, I just might try the cut-off broomstick suggestion, it certainly appeals to the miser in me! I know if you want to be serious a tripod is a necessity rather than a luxury, but I am taking these photos for my own pleasure and maybe to impress my wife and justify the cost of the lenses! Anyway, once I learn to get the basics right I am definitely going to buy a good tripod. Oh and another thing, none of the macro lenses will autofocus on my D40, it is all manual.

@ni2sml, I am aware that VR won't do anything if the subject is moving. Just mentioned it because since the lens isn't VR and I am not exactly rock steady hand holding, a faster shutter speed would reduce the effect of both the shake as well as the wind moving the subject.
__________________
flickr | Picasa | Nikon D90 | Tamron AF 18-270mm Di II VC | Tamron SP AF Di 90mm
Experience is what you get when you don't get what you want.
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 06-22-2008, 10:05 PM
ni2sml's Avatar
Nifty Fifty | 200-500 Posts
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Moneta, VA
Posts: 211
Default

I have the same problem with shaky hands. VR would definitely be helpful for me, but right now a cutoff broomstick is more in my price range.
__________________
Modified Olympus C4000Z, Pentax AF500FTZ and Minolta 1800AF flashes.

Flickr. Website. Blog. Twitter.

I am not The Stig.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

What’s Your Preference?

Daily Digest

Each day we send out a quick email to thousands of DPS readers to notify them of updates. This email is just short excerpt of the first few lines of our latest post with a link if you want to read it all. You can unsubscribe from this this service at any time.

This service is provided by a third party (Feedburner) and you can subscribe to it by leaving your email address in the following field and confirming your subscription when you get an email asking you to do so.

Enter your email address for
Daily Updates:

Weekly Summary

For those wanting a weekly summary of what happens on this site this free email newsletter is probably your best option. It includes a summary of the tips posted to the site each week. This newsletter is subscribed to by over 25000 readers (many who also subscribe to the other options above) - come join the community!

To subscribe to this weekly newsletter simply add your email address to the following field and then follow the confirmation prompts. You will be able to unsubscribe at any time.

Enter your email address for
Free Weekly Newsletter:

 
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.0