#21 (permalink)  
Old 12-24-2006, 01:54 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Western Massachusetts
Posts: 163
Default

Well I tried the "Reversed" lens. I have an 50mm F1.8 FD (Older canon lens). and put it glass to glass with my EF 50mm

The cool thing is that the FD Lens outer ring is 55mm and the outer ring of the EF lens is 52mm. So with some black construction paper and a couple of rubber bands (To block out light), This is what I got.


Poor Mans Macro Lens Example
__________________
Canon 20D W/ 430EX Flash, 50mm F1.8 and 17-40mm F4L Lens

Bail on Flickr, Deviant Art (Friend me!)
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 01-02-2007, 06:03 PM
gdelossantos's Avatar
Point & Shoot
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Victoria, Tamaulipas, MX
Posts: 10
Post

I have some of those screw-in macros, a set of +1, +2 and +4, another of +3 and +10, all togheter make +20, i'm learning to use them cuz i have a few days with them...

Nopal

This show is with +3 hehe...
__________________
gil de los santos
sites: collective // flickr // pixelrojo
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 01-20-2007, 10:33 AM
beckywithasmile's Avatar
Living in Japan
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Japan
Posts: 87
Default

Here are two of mine with a screw on filter. I have a Panasonic DMC FZ7 (not you're average point and shoot, but not a SLR). Here were some of my results

Drop of water

Snow on a branch
__________________
Find me on Flickr:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/beckywithasmile
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 01-23-2007, 01:28 AM
New Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 46
Default

Glad to see everyone experimenting, learning, ... and generally having some fun!

For the vast majority, something like the Canon 250D or 500D diopters is what you would want to screw on the front of your lens.
You can add them to the macro, ... or to your zoom. (I do not know what Nikon calls their diopters)
Works like a charm, and I often use the 500D on a older zoom for the type of depth it gives me, plus allowing me to zoom in and out without changing focus.

If I remember in this thread, one asked where to get the step up/step down rings, or macro coupling rings, to add a 50mm lens in reverse to your existing macro.
You can find these at B&H Photo or Adorama fairly easy.
They usually run around $15.

If you care to look, take a look at my blog journal and you can see many images made with the zoom/diopter combo, and some with the reverse 50mm attached to the macro.

Many have asked me why I will use a reverse lens on my macro, when I can do the same thing with extension tubes.
The reason being that I get the kind of depth that I want with the reverse method.
You simply have your reversed lens set to wide open and make adjustments with your main lens. Plus this helps to eliminate vignetting on the corners.
A 50mm 1.4 or 1.2 lens often will help in eliminating the vignetting as well.

I need more coffee before I write anymore!

Hope this might help a bit!
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 01-24-2008, 10:17 PM
velvet4269's Avatar
Loves the moderation team!
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: the space between
Posts: 1,140
Default

I bought a set of 4 (+1, +2, +4 and +10) close-up filters from Amazon.com - I tried getting the Bower, but the place I ordered from was out of stock, so they sent me the Mandee 4-set for the same cost: about $20. I've been having fun with them, and gotten some interesting results, although I'm still playing with them. You can see my results here. All photos are hand-held.

They're definitely growing on me, but they're also very much making me want a macro lens.
__________________
Olympus E-500 (14-45mm & 40-150mm kit lenses) / Sigma f/2.8 105mm EX Macro DG Lens / Olympus ED f/4.0-5.6 70-300mm Lens / Metz 48 AF-1 Flash / Mandee +1, +2, +4, and +10 Close-Up Filters / SunPak Circular Polarizer
Blog / Gallery / Flickr

OK to edit and repost my photo(s) only in the DPS forums
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 01-26-2008, 07:40 PM
Digital SLR
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Dominican Republic
Posts: 66
Default

I tried a set of close-up lens, but didn´t have much success. So then I tried a Raynox DCR-250 snap-on conversion lens. I like it much better. The cost is about the same < $50. My sunflower shot in this thred was taken with this lens.
magote
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

What’s Your Preference?

Daily Digest

Each day we send out a quick email to thousands of DPS readers to notify them of updates. This email is just short excerpt of the first few lines of our latest post with a link if you want to read it all. You can unsubscribe from this this service at any time.

This service is provided by a third party (Feedburner) and you can subscribe to it by leaving your email address in the following field and confirming your subscription when you get an email asking you to do so.

Enter your email address for
Daily Updates:

Weekly Summary

For those wanting a weekly summary of what happens on this site this free email newsletter is probably your best option. It includes a summary of the tips posted to the site each week. This newsletter is subscribed to by over 25000 readers (many who also subscribe to the other options above) - come join the community!

To subscribe to this weekly newsletter simply add your email address to the following field and then follow the confirmation prompts. You will be able to unsubscribe at any time.

Enter your email address for
Free Weekly Newsletter:

 
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.0