|
|||
|
Hi John,
Thanks for directing in right direction. I will post the EXIF data. I have captured the image in Aperture Priority mode. Camera Nikon D90 Exposure 0.008 sec (1/125) Aperture f/5.6 Focal Length 85 mm Focal Length 84.8 mm ISO Speed 250 Do u feel that image is not sharp? I felt like image is not enough sharp. Cheers, |
|
||||
|
Quote:
Not familiar with this lens, but if you could have perhaps further reduced your f/number letting more light in, compensating by equivalent decrease in exposure time; for example going to f/4 and 1/500 s would give you the same exposure, but it might have further improved the "bokeh" of the blurred background, making it even less distinguishable as a tree and leaves and more like a greenish blur. That is nice as is, but you might have experimented with it possibly. The other thing that might have helped is moving closer to the subject so as to increase the ratio of the distance between the distance to the purple flowers and the camera relative to that between the flowers and the tree background. That may have meant going, say to a 50 mm focus, and when you go to lower focal lengths, in many lenses, you can at the same time reduce your f/number increasing the diameter of the aperture which yet again benefits reduced depth of field and less sharpness in the background. So I like this image, but I would also have liked to see what it might have been if the tree background had been even more blurred. How to do that would be to shoot the flowers closer to the camera to accentuate the difference between flowers to camera versus flowers to background, and at the same time trying to open up the aperture which means reducing the f/number. The thing to do, I think, is experiment with the parameters of distance-to-subect versus distanct of background, aperture size, and shutter speed. And then, rather than just trying to pick out your favorite, trying to understand why each thing you did had the effect it had. Maybe your lens is one of those expensive ones that can shoot at f/2.8 throughout the entire focal length range. In that case, you definitely would have benefitted from getting closer, reducing your focal length, opening up your aperture and compensating with faster shutter speed. And by the way, I would say always shoot at the lowest ISO you can under the circumstances, but cause as you go up in ISO, noise increases and quality decreases. But this normally doesn't become at all important or noticible under ISO 800. Hope this helps. Let me know if anything is unclear.
__________________
And God said, Let there be Lighght !!! lux et veritas Everything is evanescent. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Each day we send out a quick email to thousands of DPS readers to notify them of updates. This email is just short excerpt of the first few lines of our latest post with a link if you want to read it all. You can unsubscribe from this this service at any time.
This service is provided by a third party (Feedburner) and you can subscribe to it by leaving your email address in the following field and confirming your subscription when you get an email asking you to do so.
Enter your email address for
Daily Updates:
For those wanting a weekly summary of what happens on this site this free email newsletter is probably your best option. It includes a summary of the tips posted to the site each week. This newsletter is subscribed to by over 25000 readers (many who also subscribe to the other options above) - come join the community!
To subscribe to this weekly newsletter simply add your email address to the following field and then follow the confirmation prompts. You will be able to unsubscribe at any time.
Enter your email address for
Free Weekly Newsletter: