#1 (permalink)  
Old 03-09-2011, 07:12 PM
I'm new here!
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 5
Default Using a diffuser on flash - Exposure question

When you use a diffuser, do you need to compensate by increasing the flash exposure for the light intensity that is reduced by the diffuser?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 03-09-2011, 07:26 PM
scootermcq's Avatar
Ad lucem
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 2,532
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Spodeworld View Post
When you use a diffuser, do you need to compensate by increasing the flash exposure for the light intensity that is reduced by the diffuser?
Usually, yes...
__________________
Scott
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 03-09-2011, 07:28 PM
I'm new here!
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 5
Default

Is there a rule of thumb? For example, when using a diffuser, you should increase flash exposure by X....if so, is there a generally accepted number for X?

Thanks

Quote:
Originally Posted by scootermcq View Post
Usually, yes...
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 03-09-2011, 08:45 PM
zona5101's Avatar
Molon Labe
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Boise, Idaho
Posts: 7,058
Default

Usually no.
too many independent variables

If you are ittl or ettl the camera should pick up the light drop off and increase the flash exposure. I know that with Nikon ittl, it likes to do its own fill flash ratio and when i add a diffuser it underexposes a bit and i crank up the flash comp by 1/3 of a stop.

If doing manual off camera flash there certainly needs to be some compensation and it will vary by the particular light modifier but you are accounting for it when you set your power and take a meter reading or test shot.
__________________
They call me Bruce
www.brucebphotography.wordpress.com
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 03-09-2011, 09:34 PM
I'm new here!
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 5
Default

So, are you saying that with an iTTL flash like the SB600, the flash can take the presence of a diffuser into account and adjust the exposure accordingly (although maybe not perfectly)?

Quote:
Originally Posted by zona5101 View Post
Usually no.
too many independent variables

If you are ittl or ettl the camera should pick up the light drop off and increase the flash exposure. I know that with Nikon ittl, it likes to do its own fill flash ratio and when i add a diffuser it underexposes a bit and i crank up the flash comp by 1/3 of a stop.

If doing manual off camera flash there certainly needs to be some compensation and it will vary by the particular light modifier but you are accounting for it when you set your power and take a meter reading or test shot.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 03-09-2011, 11:12 PM
zona5101's Avatar
Molon Labe
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Boise, Idaho
Posts: 7,058
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Spodeworld View Post
So, are you saying that with an iTTL flash like the SB600, the flash can take the presence of a diffuser into account and adjust the exposure accordingly (although maybe not perfectly)?
yup. just like it figures out how much light to dump when you bounce flash...
__________________
They call me Bruce
www.brucebphotography.wordpress.com
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 03-09-2011, 11:24 PM
sk66's Avatar
Lovable Contrarian
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Harrisburg, PA
Posts: 6,744
Default

In any of the automatic modes the camera reads the light coming back to it and shots the flash off when it has "enough"....But I think there's a "lead time" built in (i.e. the flash is cut off just before "enough" because more is coming) and it doesn't account for the increased dropoff due the modifier....

With Nikon I believe the SB900 actually does know there's a modifier of some sort and adjusts accordingly.
__________________
Steve
the Photographic Academy.com
My Portfolio, My Flickr, My Blog
D4, D7000, G10, 1030SW and a bunch of other stuff....
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 03-10-2011, 02:46 PM
scootermcq's Avatar
Ad lucem
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 2,532
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sk66 View Post
With Nikon I believe the SB900 actually does know there's a modifier of some sort and adjusts accordingly.
My SB900 is better at doing proper exposure, but I do find it need to be bumped +0.7 when using a bounce card if the subject is further than 5 feet away. TTL is great, but I find I am constantly adjusting flash compensation depending on the distance to the subject.

If for some reason I was ever to do direct flash, I do find it nails it most times.
__________________
Scott

Last edited by scootermcq; 03-10-2011 at 02:48 PM. Reason: added bit about direct flash
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 03-10-2011, 04:05 PM
OsmosisStudios's Avatar
Don't Panic
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Mississauga / Ottawa
Posts: 11,358
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by scootermcq View Post
My SB900 is better at doing proper exposure, but I do find it need to be bumped +0.7 when using a bounce card if the subject is further than 5 feet away. TTL is great, but I find I am constantly adjusting flash compensation depending on the distance to the subject.

If for some reason I was ever to do direct flash, I do find it nails it most times.
Same with my SB-800 (I dont use the 600s on-camera). I tend to go for +1FEV, just enough to almost clip the highlights.

Off-camera flashes are always in manual: I adjust based on what I see the need is.
__________________
I am responsible for what I say; not what you understand.
OsmosisStudios
Gear List
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 03-10-2011, 06:17 PM
I'm new here!
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 5
Default

So, I have a Nikon SB600. From what you are saying (assuming similar to SB900), it attempts to adjust flash strength for add-ons, like diffusers. Is that correct?

Quote:
Originally Posted by sk66 View Post
In any of the automatic modes the camera reads the light coming back to it and shots the flash off when it has "enough"....But I think there's a "lead time" built in (i.e. the flash is cut off just before "enough" because more is coming) and it doesn't account for the increased dropoff due the modifier....

With Nikon I believe the SB900 actually does know there's a modifier of some sort and adjusts accordingly.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
exposure, flash

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

What’s Your Preference?

Daily Digest

Each day we send out a quick email to thousands of DPS readers to notify them of updates. This email is just short excerpt of the first few lines of our latest post with a link if you want to read it all. You can unsubscribe from this this service at any time.

This service is provided by a third party (Feedburner) and you can subscribe to it by leaving your email address in the following field and confirming your subscription when you get an email asking you to do so.

Enter your email address for
Daily Updates:

Weekly Summary

For those wanting a weekly summary of what happens on this site this free email newsletter is probably your best option. It includes a summary of the tips posted to the site each week. This newsletter is subscribed to by over 25000 readers (many who also subscribe to the other options above) - come join the community!

To subscribe to this weekly newsletter simply add your email address to the following field and then follow the confirmation prompts. You will be able to unsubscribe at any time.

Enter your email address for
Free Weekly Newsletter:

 
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.0