|
||||
|
One environment I frequently find myself photographing in is lighting situations where one aspect is much brighter or much darker than another. I have a number of shots that extremely overexposed and underexposed. The ones that do come out tend to be either washed out (overexposed) or grainy (underexposed). I can't seem to get right mix.
In this shot I don't care so much that the ground is as black as it appears even if it wasn't this dark in person. The blackness in this case I think enhances the rays of the sun. I'm making a lot of progress with the triangle with photos needing few and few adjustments when converting from RAW but this kind of lighting seems to escape me. I used a 50mm prime here. ![]() Camera: Canon EOS Digital Rebel XSi Exposure: 0.008 sec (1/125) Aperture: f/1.8 Focal Length: 50 mm Exposure: 0.00 ISO Speed: 200 Exposure Bias: 0 EV Flash: Off, Did not fire
__________________
Matthew J Stevens Canon 7D | blue m photography | blue m photography on Facebook | | Twitter | Facebook | |
|
|||
|
ok there are a couple different ways to take a picture like the one you have displayed and maintain some foreground detail. The incamera method would be to get a graduated ND filter. This is a filter that is tinted on one side and gradually fades to clear on the other side. So for the shot above you would put the tinted side over the sky and clear side on the ground. This will balance the exposure of the scene more and hopefully enough that the camera can capture the entire dynamic range in one shot.
Another way to do what you are asking is to take several different photos of different exposure and then merge them together as an HDR (high dynamic range) photograph. This requires some special software to merge the photos together and also ideally you have a good tripod to keep the camera in the same spot.
__________________
Rex K The view from my "office" doesn't suck.
|
|
||||
|
What about the graininess of the image? With such a bright subject in a relatively dark environment a long exposure inevitably leads to overexposure.
__________________
Matthew J Stevens Canon 7D | blue m photography | blue m photography on Facebook | | Twitter | Facebook | |
|
|||
|
adjust the noise reduction when you are working with raw files. Again when shooting in raw the camera does not do any noise reduction like it would with a jpeg.
Using a long exposure do not necessarliy mean over exposure. It just depends on the scene. In this scene if you use a ND grad filter to darken up the sky you will be able to expose the ground more.
__________________
Rex K The view from my "office" doesn't suck.
|
|
||||
|
Composition-wise, I would've placed the horizon on the lower third instead of almost at the bottom.
__________________
Canon Rebel XTi Gripped | Canon 18-55 IS | Canon 85 f/1.8 | Canon 430ex II Quote:
|
|
||||
|
Gadget...What you are dealing with is high contrast imagery....that is, you have a very bright sky and a very dark foreground. Unfortunately a camera cannot read the entire dynamic range of lights and darks that our eyes can. This means that without some sort of enhancement, such as a filter or combining bracketed shots (HDR techniques), you will not be able to get both sky and foreground in correct exposure.
Understanding this limitation, here are a couple comments. Long shutter speeds will not result in over-exposure if you have the proper aperture and ISO settings for "that" exposure. Actually it can be said that longer shutter speeds can result in better sky colors for your type of shot. I see you used ISO 200, f/1.8, and 1/125th shutter. First, I would use the lowest ISO possible, such as ISO 100. That will give you the least amount of grain and the best image quality. Next, I would also never shoot without a tripod. It's a necessity. On shutter and aperture...I would definitely use a smaller aperture, such as f/11 or f/13...for two reasons. First, it will give you better depth of field and thus a sharper image. Don't go overboard...f/16 is about as high as I go unless you know your lens and it's diffraction qualities. Second, a wide-open aperture, such as f/1.8 as you've used, will give you harsher color rendition and saturation and will exaggerate your over/under exposure predicament. I would not use a wide-open aperture for any circumstance unless you have no choice, such as a really low-light indoor event where flash is not possible. Finally, I would use your "shade" white balance setting which will give warmer results...or custom set to the scene. Of course with RAW, this isn't as important, but it will give you the preview to know while you are there.
__________________
Cameras: Pentax K20D, K10D, *istDL, ZX-7, ZX-L Lenses: Pentax DA 10-17, DA 16-45, DA 55-300, DA 40 Ltd, M-50, M-28, Tamron 28-75, Sigma 170-500 www.eaglevistagallery.com - Flickr Photostream - Pentax Photo Gallery |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Each day we send out a quick email to thousands of DPS readers to notify them of updates. This email is just short excerpt of the first few lines of our latest post with a link if you want to read it all. You can unsubscribe from this this service at any time.
This service is provided by a third party (Feedburner) and you can subscribe to it by leaving your email address in the following field and confirming your subscription when you get an email asking you to do so.
Enter your email address for
Daily Updates:
For those wanting a weekly summary of what happens on this site this free email newsletter is probably your best option. It includes a summary of the tips posted to the site each week. This newsletter is subscribed to by over 25000 readers (many who also subscribe to the other options above) - come join the community!
To subscribe to this weekly newsletter simply add your email address to the following field and then follow the confirmation prompts. You will be able to unsubscribe at any time.
Enter your email address for
Free Weekly Newsletter: