#1 (permalink)  
Old 03-19-2009, 03:10 AM
I'm new here!
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 3
Question stars >>> big dots

Tonight I tried a shot of the stars from my backyard. The sky was a little hazy but not too bad. Could see lots of starts plainly. Used 18-55mm lens set at 18mm. Tried lowest f stop (widest aperture). Tried highest ISO (3200). Shutter opened for 30 seconds. Camera on tripod. Used wireless remote for shutter. Thus, no camera shake. Pictures came out grainy (from 3200 ISO, I presume) and stars were big round dots, not points of light. What did I do wrong?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 03-19-2009, 12:31 PM
OsmosisStudios's Avatar
Don't Panic
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Mississauga / Ottawa
Posts: 11,357
Default

You overexposed the ever-loving crap out of the Haze.

What happened is that, because your shutter was open so long, you had alot of light from the stars hitting the haze, which was then reflected into the camera. By itself that probably wouldnt be a massive issue, but with a long shutterspeed, wide aperture and high ISO, youre begging for a big old fashioned blowout.

When doing stars you should have settings as follows:
Aperture: f/16 (general rule, but its about right)
ISO: As low as possible. Probably 100.
Shutterspeed: BULB. This allows you to set the shutterspeed into the minutes, hours, etc.

Now, BULB actually allows you to keep the shutter open for as long as youre holding the shutter release down. In this case, a remote works well. You didnt mention whether you were shooting NIkon or Canon, but both have wireless remotes for dirt cheap ($25, first party). With the Nikon (and presumably canon), you press the remote once to open and once to close: you can have HOURS in between, provided the camera is being fed with power from either a battery of an AC adapter.

The other thing you'll need is a cristal clear night. With long exposure, any haze you can see will be multiplied by a very high factor. You need it to be clear. The other thing you'll need is a low light-pollution area. Shooting in town isnt an option: youre gonna need to get waaaay out there
__________________
I am responsible for what I say; not what you understand.
OsmosisStudios
Gear List
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 03-19-2009, 01:45 PM
I'm new here!
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 3
Default

Thanks for the advice! As you can tell, I'm a novice. I really appreciate your help.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 03-19-2009, 02:55 PM
OsmosisStudios's Avatar
Don't Panic
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Mississauga / Ottawa
Posts: 11,357
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pappy View Post
Thanks for the advice! As you can tell, I'm a novice. I really appreciate your help.
No problem. That;s what we're here for.

There are alot of things that most people dont shoot on a regular basis and, when they try, they get some pretty wonky results. Youve obviously experienced this. I have too, in the past.

Most weird things ive seen revolve around night-shooting too.
__________________
I am responsible for what I say; not what you understand.
OsmosisStudios
Gear List
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 03-22-2009, 07:15 PM
Egger's Avatar
dPS Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Belgium
Posts: 63
Default

Also, maybe the auto focus couldn't focus on the stars so the round circles were bokeh(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bokeh). It may be helpful to switch to manual focus and put the distance on infinite.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 03-25-2009, 02:28 AM
navcom's Avatar
dPS +1000 Club
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Wild blue yonder
Posts: 1,307
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OsmosisStudios View Post
You didnt mention whether you were shooting NIkon or Canon, but both have wireless remotes for dirt cheap ($25, first party). With the Nikon (and presumably canon), you press the remote once to open and once to close: you can have HOURS in between, provided the camera is being fed with power from either a battery of an AC adapter.
Hmmm...you know there are other camera brands out there besides Nikon and Canon that do just fine too. And they even come with remotes and AC adapters!

Had to say that!

Otherwise, advice on haze and exposure is right. I assume the OP wants to do star trail photos. A 30 second exposure will not produce star trails, but just star "dots", as stated. You need very long exposures to produce long trails. With a digital camera, it is better (though not required) to do several shots of about 10 minutes a piece and then combine them together.

A free program that is perfect for this can be downloaded at www.startrails.de.
__________________
Cameras: Pentax K5, K20D, K10D, *istDL, ZX-7, ZX-L
Eagle Vista Photography - Flickr - Pentax Gallery
"Anybody can make the simple complicated. Creativity is making the complicated simple." Charlie Mingus

Last edited by navcom; 03-25-2009 at 02:39 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 03-25-2009, 08:40 PM
dcclark's Avatar
Moderates the loving team
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Houghton, MI
Posts: 2,359
Default

Since we're on the topic of star trails...

First, depending on your camera, 10 minute exposures could cause some bad amp noise. On my D40, I have been attempting 3 minute exposures, which are just about the limit.

Second, does anyone know of a free stacking program for Mac OS X? I have used PhotoAcute, but it's just a demo version of a for-pay program, and it really has a terrible interface. Also, it watermarks my photos. Any ideas?
__________________
David Clark Photography, project 365 photo blog, flickr.
It is OK to edit and repost my photos on the DPS forums only.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 03-25-2009, 09:24 PM
navcom's Avatar
dPS +1000 Club
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Wild blue yonder
Posts: 1,307
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dcclark View Post
Since we're on the topic of star trails...

First, depending on your camera, 10 minute exposures could cause some bad amp noise. On my D40, I have been attempting 3 minute exposures, which are just about the limit.

Second, does anyone know of a free stacking program for Mac OS X? I have used PhotoAcute, but it's just a demo version of a for-pay program, and it really has a terrible interface. Also, it watermarks my photos. Any ideas?
You are right. I suggested the 10-minute interval precisely because of sensor noise. 10 is about the max most cameras will be able to handle without undue noise (depending on the outside air temp).

Many cameras have noise reduction features. These usually compensate for generated noise by taking a second photo with the shutter closed (black) and using it to remove the noise from the initial exposure. This usually means that when you are done taking your long exposure, the shutter will close and the camera will sit there for long time taking a second exposure similar in lenth to the first. If you are taking several in succession, waiting for this feature to finish will result in gaps in your star trails.

For this reason, if your camera has a noise reduction feature that responds this way, turn off the noise reduction completely. After all your exposures are finished, THEN take a black photo manually. The star trails program I suggested allows you to include a "black" frame for just this reason...noise reduction.

I love star trail photos! I think it's the relaxing nature of taking them that is so wonderful!
__________________
Cameras: Pentax K5, K20D, K10D, *istDL, ZX-7, ZX-L
Eagle Vista Photography - Flickr - Pentax Gallery
"Anybody can make the simple complicated. Creativity is making the complicated simple." Charlie Mingus
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

What’s Your Preference?

Daily Digest

Each day we send out a quick email to thousands of DPS readers to notify them of updates. This email is just short excerpt of the first few lines of our latest post with a link if you want to read it all. You can unsubscribe from this this service at any time.

This service is provided by a third party (Feedburner) and you can subscribe to it by leaving your email address in the following field and confirming your subscription when you get an email asking you to do so.

Enter your email address for
Daily Updates:

Weekly Summary

For those wanting a weekly summary of what happens on this site this free email newsletter is probably your best option. It includes a summary of the tips posted to the site each week. This newsletter is subscribed to by over 25000 readers (many who also subscribe to the other options above) - come join the community!

To subscribe to this weekly newsletter simply add your email address to the following field and then follow the confirmation prompts. You will be able to unsubscribe at any time.

Enter your email address for
Free Weekly Newsletter:

 
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.0