#1 (permalink)  
Old 10-12-2009, 03:10 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 168
Default Chrch in B&W critique

I recently bought a new Canon 10-22 lens and love the way you can get in close to your subject-buildings etc.
It does create some interesting angles.
I took this church today and converted it to black & white as I felt it gave it more atmosphere.
I left the picture quite under-exposed on the near side as I thought it gave the picture more depth.
Would loike oppinions on the picture, composition, exposure etc.
What would you do to improve a picture like this?

Church B&W

Exposure 1/320
ISO 100
Aperture f/8.0
Focal length 10mm
__________________
Canon 40D, EFS 10-22mm, 24-105 ef l & EF 85mm f/1.8-Manfrotto 055XPROB Tripod.
My flickr
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 10-12-2009, 03:40 PM
Loves the moderation team!
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Colorado
Posts: 54
Default

My eye is drawn to the upper right and I loose the church unless I consciously focus there.

The idea is great and I like the clouds in the sky.

I also see competing subjects of the picture (church and sky).

Take it with a grain of salt. At least you are out shooting and posting.

Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 10-12-2009, 03:51 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 168
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IlluminatingPhoto View Post
My eye is drawn to the upper right and I loose the church unless I consciously focus there.

The idea is great and I like the clouds in the sky.

I also see competing subjects of the picture (church and sky).

Take it with a grain of salt. At least you are out shooting and posting.

Thanks
I can see where you are coming from. Maybe if the trees were not there and I had just the sky as background, the church would stand out more. I guess this is also where black & white can make a picture more difficult as you need a more defining seperation of shadows & highlights.
Thanks for your comments. Im interested in any point of view.

Carl
__________________
Canon 40D, EFS 10-22mm, 24-105 ef l & EF 85mm f/1.8-Manfrotto 055XPROB Tripod.
My flickr
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 10-12-2009, 05:35 PM
Loves the moderation team!
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Winnipeg, MB, Canada
Posts: 112
Smile

You have a beautiful thing going here!

I really appreciate the angle combined with the black and white which creates the emotion for me. The only challenge I feel with the image is the dark on the left side. Is it possible to lighten it up a bit to make the focus on the church? I think you need part of the sky to get the really effect as you have done, but still keep the church as the focal point.

I hope that makes sense.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 10-12-2009, 06:29 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 168
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by See & Wonder View Post
You have a beautiful thing going here!

I really appreciate the angle combined with the black and white which creates the emotion for me. The only challenge I feel with the image is the dark on the left side. Is it possible to lighten it up a bit to make the focus on the church? I think you need part of the sky to get the really effect as you have done, but still keep the church as the focal point.

I hope that makes sense.
Church2

I added the infared treatment, never tried this before but it does lighten up the church now.

Carl
__________________
Canon 40D, EFS 10-22mm, 24-105 ef l & EF 85mm f/1.8-Manfrotto 055XPROB Tripod.
My flickr
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 10-12-2009, 08:02 PM
Loves the moderation team!
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Colorado
Posts: 54
Default

The picture with the infrared filter looks more appealing to me now. The trees look a a bit off.

Good work
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 10-13-2009, 12:55 AM
abarickman's Avatar
Loves the moderation team!
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Chicago Burbs
Posts: 584
Default

I find the dark on the left side distracting. I like the concept but I would try to lighten up the church more and see what you get. Maybe use an exposure gradient?
__________________

AJ Barickman Fine Imagery
Photostream
Canon 40D | Canon 24mm-70mm F2.8L | Canon EF 70mm-200mm F4 L IS | Canon EF 50mm F1.4 | Canon 100mm F2.8 Macro |
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

What’s Your Preference?

Daily Digest

Each day we send out a quick email to thousands of DPS readers to notify them of updates. This email is just short excerpt of the first few lines of our latest post with a link if you want to read it all. You can unsubscribe from this this service at any time.

This service is provided by a third party (Feedburner) and you can subscribe to it by leaving your email address in the following field and confirming your subscription when you get an email asking you to do so.

Enter your email address for
Daily Updates:

Weekly Summary

For those wanting a weekly summary of what happens on this site this free email newsletter is probably your best option. It includes a summary of the tips posted to the site each week. This newsletter is subscribed to by over 25000 readers (many who also subscribe to the other options above) - come join the community!

To subscribe to this weekly newsletter simply add your email address to the following field and then follow the confirmation prompts. You will be able to unsubscribe at any time.

Enter your email address for
Free Weekly Newsletter:

 
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.0