#1 (permalink)  
Old 10-10-2011, 08:54 PM
dPS Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Northern California Coast
Posts: 108
Default Big Sur b/w - help and suggestions?

I've been working on this shot and some others from a recent trip to Big Sur. I'm working in Aperture. I've just picked up a copy of Photoshop Elements 9 and hope to start learning my way around it this week. So now I'm looking for help and suggestions with this image:

DSC_0700

While I'd love to get feedback on the composition (is it too center weighted?) and the exposure (is it too dark?) as well as the b/w conversion, I'm also looking for thoughts as to what I might be able to do with it when I gain access to the additional tools that PSE will make available to me. Can I use the image as it currently is and build on it in PSE or should I start over again from the RAW file in PSE, re-do the conversion and ignore Aperture completely? I'm very open to any suggestions people have.

Thanks for any time and thought you bring to this. Oh, yeah, here's some Exif:

Camera Nikon D80
Exposure 0.006 sec (1/160)
Aperture f/11.0
Focal Length 22 mm
ISO Speed 200
Exposure Bias 0 EV
Flash No Flash
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 10-10-2011, 11:17 PM
dPS Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 207
Default

I really like it. The composition is good although (on my monitor) there's a lot of blocky blacks. It definitely makes me think of Weston.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 10-11-2011, 06:20 PM
Krusty79's Avatar
Smart ass (_e=mc2_)
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 3,364
Default

It's a very nice scene, but you have a dynamic range problem. I looked at a histogram of your shot and there is clipping at both ends, but mostly at the dark end. There are many dark areas with no detail. I would shoot this closer to sunset when you have less dynamic range to deal with. A graduated ND filter may have helped.

I like the scene, but I feel that it could use more of a subject or focal point. Too bad the sky wasn't more interesting.
__________________
GREG - Canon XS with 18-55 kit
flickr
flickriver
My 500px
"You can't be young forever, but you can always be immature." - Larry Andersen.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 10-11-2011, 09:11 PM
dPS Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Northern California Coast
Posts: 108
Default

Thanks to both Shruggy and Krusty for your time and trouble.

Shruggy -- I agree about the blocky blacks. Do you have any suggestions as to how those might be mitigated in post or did I lock those in when I took the shot?

Krusty -- Absolutely right about dynamic range. The darks really kind of dominate the shot more than I'd like. I shot from that spot at 4 different times over 3 days but never got the combination of ocean, lighting and sky that I hoped for. I'll probably shoot there again sometime (it's about 2 hours from here) and will certainly try both early morning and late afternoon. Is there any way to address these issues in post or is this a shoot-only issue?

I feel like I've gotten as much as I can out of this image in Aperture. I'm hoping there is more available to me in post as I learn PSE. I'm going to put up at least 2 more images from this trip and hope to hear back with some critiques and comments. Thanks again.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 10-11-2011, 11:54 PM
Krusty79's Avatar
Smart ass (_e=mc2_)
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 3,364
Default

There is no magic tool in PP that will fix a dynamic range issue. I wish there was! I heard Lightroom has a ND grad effect, but I don't know if that really corrects the dynamic range problem. That's why just about any landscape shot you see in a professional gallery was shot in the golden hours and they often use ND grad filters to reduce the brightness of the sky relative to the ground.
__________________
GREG - Canon XS with 18-55 kit
flickr
flickriver
My 500px
"You can't be young forever, but you can always be immature." - Larry Andersen.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 10-12-2011, 12:21 AM
dPS Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Northern California Coast
Posts: 108
Default

Thanks Krusty. I'll look into ND filters.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 10-12-2011, 04:12 PM
Krusty79's Avatar
Smart ass (_e=mc2_)
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 3,364
Default

The ND Grad filters are the ones the reduce the brightness of the sky relative to the ground. Get a 3 stop one if you do. The Lee and Singh-Ray are very good; HiTech if you're on a budget. I would avoid Cokin, as I hear they are not really neutral.
__________________
GREG - Canon XS with 18-55 kit
flickr
flickriver
My 500px
"You can't be young forever, but you can always be immature." - Larry Andersen.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 10-12-2011, 06:39 PM
crockny's Avatar
Wherever I go, there I am
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York City
Posts: 720
Default

I'm thinking that if you got down lower you'd have more rock in the front (hopefully with nice rock detail), your wave would look higher in the sky and the big rock on the left wouldn't be so lost against the background cliffs ...
__________________
http://untamednewyork.smugmug.com/

Canon 7D; Canon Rebel XSi; Tamron 18-270; 50mm 1.4; Canon 400mm 5.6, Canon 100mm Macro, Sigma 10-20mm, Speedlight 580EX - and the list keeps growing
[/SIZE]
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 10-12-2011, 09:44 PM
dPS Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 207
Default

While I agree with Krusty in that you should always try to get the best image in the camera, I think you may have loads of leeway with this picture if you've got it in a RAW form. If you process it in Photoshop & maybe up the exposure a little & increase the fill light without losing the contrast that makes the foam bright then you might easily regain definition on the rocks. Once the picture is processed & saved as a .psd then you can look at the histogram & pin down the dark & bright highlights & adjust the middle point.
Hope that makes sense. I like the composition.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 10-13-2011, 12:33 AM
dPS Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Northern California Coast
Posts: 108
Default

Thanks Shruggy. I always shoot RAW but I'm a total Photoshop novice. As mentioned above, I worked on this image in Aperture. I have just picked up a copy of Photoshop Elements 9 and I'm starting to learn my way around but it is all very new to me. I'll try to do some of what you've suggested and see where that leads me. I appreciate your thoughts on this.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

What’s Your Preference?

Daily Digest

Each day we send out a quick email to thousands of DPS readers to notify them of updates. This email is just short excerpt of the first few lines of our latest post with a link if you want to read it all. You can unsubscribe from this this service at any time.

This service is provided by a third party (Feedburner) and you can subscribe to it by leaving your email address in the following field and confirming your subscription when you get an email asking you to do so.

Enter your email address for
Daily Updates:

Weekly Summary

For those wanting a weekly summary of what happens on this site this free email newsletter is probably your best option. It includes a summary of the tips posted to the site each week. This newsletter is subscribed to by over 25000 readers (many who also subscribe to the other options above) - come join the community!

To subscribe to this weekly newsletter simply add your email address to the following field and then follow the confirmation prompts. You will be able to unsubscribe at any time.

Enter your email address for
Free Weekly Newsletter:

 
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.0