#1 (permalink)  
Old 09-21-2011, 04:37 AM
ccting's Avatar
NowICloseUrMindToUrOwn
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Not open minded?
Posts: 1,256
Default Horizons from Hill near my House



ISO 100,
Aperture f6.3
Focal Length: 18mm
Len: VR Kit Len 18-55mm Nikon
Lighting: Very Dull
Nikon D5100, aperture Mode for f6.3
Shutter speed 1/200
Original file size 1.5GB

1) Anything to be improved for the post-production?
2) I found that most profs out there use smaller aperture, such as f8, f16 (sunny16), or even the smallest. My justification is a) f6.3 is the sharpest for 18mm for my len b) I wish to get sharpest for the nearest object and blur a bit for the background. Is that reasonable?

Last edited by ccting; 09-22-2011 at 07:48 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 09-21-2011, 01:06 PM
windrider86's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Trinidad, Co
Posts: 16,143
Default

Please see the critique sections rules/guidelines for information to be included. Thank you in advance for editing your post. Please feel free to ask if you need help!
__________________
Olympus user, Fuji E900, a canon & last but not least a Minolta 35mm and some really old large format box cameras.Not to mention a whole bunch of other stuff. Paint Shop Pro X3, CS3,CS5, Portrait Professional, Topaz Adjust, Lucis Art and the list goes on........
www.alockintime.com



Facebook
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 09-22-2011, 11:11 PM
Krusty79's Avatar
Smart ass (_e=mc2_)
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 3,364
Default

You have some cool colors in the shot, but it looks oversaturated to me. Also, the image looks soft, as there are many areas, even in the foreground, that are not sharp. Shooting at 1/200, I would expect to get rid of any camera shake. Did you use a tripod?

The purplish color and the vignette in the sky isn't really working for me, as I like it more realistic. You did blur the trees in the background, but I'm not sure why unless you wanted to emphasize the foreground. If so, you should make sure that the foreground is sharp.

Although you have a nice scene there, it helps to have focal point for the eye to rest on.
__________________
GREG - Canon XS with 18-55 kit
flickr
flickriver
My 500px
"You can't be young forever, but you can always be immature." - Larry Andersen.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 09-23-2011, 12:35 AM
ccting's Avatar
NowICloseUrMindToUrOwn
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Not open minded?
Posts: 1,256
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Krusty79 View Post
You have some cool colors in the shot, but it looks oversaturated to me. Also, the image looks soft, as there are many areas, even in the foreground, that are not sharp. Shooting at 1/200, I would expect to get rid of any camera shake. Did you use a tripod?

The purplish color and the vignette in the sky isn't really working for me, as I like it more realistic. You did blur the trees in the background, but I'm not sure why unless you wanted to emphasize the foreground. If so, you should make sure that the foreground is sharp.

Although you have a nice scene there, it helps to have focal point for the eye to rest on.
The initial file size is about 1.5GB, and I compress it to 32KB..
==>Nope, I don't have a tripod, and did not have the time to borrow from my brother. I just use the panning approach that was not right one.. I was in hurry. I should have a tripod with VR NR off.

==>Nope, i did not blur the trees in the background, i use relative low f-number (6.3) for narrow DOF to gain the blur effect for feel of depth. Another reason of blur is compression from 1.5GB to 32KB, and may be because of amendment in lightroom. I agree with you, i wish to get the sharpest for foreground but did not realize when i took the pictures. I took more than hundred of images within 20 minutes before i rushed back for my baby.

==> The purple of the sky is unrealistic. I purpusely recolor them for the color harmony according to color wheel.. ;D

Yes, it was a very nice scene but we are no longer get access of the hill. The authority is building fences around the hill. The fence will block the scene even you have the permission to get up there again.

Thanks again for your advice. This is almost my first serious shot of landscape after I bought my camera.

Many not notice that the sky can be purple everyday, particulary when the sky is clear. Try to pay attention after sunset, just 3 minutes and the scenario is so called the Apenglo..(purple sky for 2-3 minutes after sunset)

Last edited by ccting; 09-23-2011 at 06:48 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 09-23-2011, 09:01 PM
Krusty79's Avatar
Smart ass (_e=mc2_)
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 3,364
Default

A tripod is pretty much a must for panoramic shots. Did you stitch several images together to make this one? Most lenses are sharpest around f/8. To get a lot of depth of field, you could shoot at f/11 and avoid the blurring. I would recommend trying that.

Too bad you won't be able to go back and reshoot. I'm down at sea level, so I don't get the alpenglow down here. I'll look for some next time I go to Yosemite or Lassen.
__________________
GREG - Canon XS with 18-55 kit
flickr
flickriver
My 500px
"You can't be young forever, but you can always be immature." - Larry Andersen.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 09-24-2011, 07:16 AM
ccting's Avatar
NowICloseUrMindToUrOwn
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Not open minded?
Posts: 1,256
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Krusty79 View Post
A tripod is pretty much a must for panoramic shots. Did you stitch several images together to make this one? Most lenses are sharpest around f/8. To get a lot of depth of field, you could shoot at f/11 and avoid the blurring. I would recommend trying that.

Too bad you won't be able to go back and reshoot. I'm down at sea level, so I don't get the alpenglow down here. I'll look for some next time I go to Yosemite or Lassen.
A good tripod is very costly, where the cheap one not stable. i don't want spend money on tripod.
Time is the issue for me, I almost don't have time to shoot.
my len f6.3 sharpest for 18mm and f8 for the rest
i believe sharpness does not matter for the web
The MTF curve for my len is not good, fall down sharply near the edge.. and great distortion for 18mm

thanks for your advice. will shoot like that once my baby can independent from me...

Last edited by ccting; 09-24-2011 at 07:43 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

What’s Your Preference?

Daily Digest

Each day we send out a quick email to thousands of DPS readers to notify them of updates. This email is just short excerpt of the first few lines of our latest post with a link if you want to read it all. You can unsubscribe from this this service at any time.

This service is provided by a third party (Feedburner) and you can subscribe to it by leaving your email address in the following field and confirming your subscription when you get an email asking you to do so.

Enter your email address for
Daily Updates:

Weekly Summary

For those wanting a weekly summary of what happens on this site this free email newsletter is probably your best option. It includes a summary of the tips posted to the site each week. This newsletter is subscribed to by over 25000 readers (many who also subscribe to the other options above) - come join the community!

To subscribe to this weekly newsletter simply add your email address to the following field and then follow the confirmation prompts. You will be able to unsubscribe at any time.

Enter your email address for
Free Weekly Newsletter:

 
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.0