#1 (permalink)  
Old 08-13-2011, 06:16 PM
EOBeav's Avatar
Inland Northwest Photog
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,074
Default Walla Walla River, monochrome

If I'm going to offer critiques, I need to post my own images for the same occasionally.

This is from a recent evening on the Walla Walla River here in Eastern Oregon. I'd like to know what you think about the composition, monochrome treatment, and overall look/feel of this photograph. Thanks for taking the time to create some meaningful dialogue. You can see a larger view here.


River Dance by Rick.Scheibner, on Flickr

EXIF:
Camera Canon EOS Digital Rebel XSi
Lens: Canon EF 17-40mm f/4 L
Exposure 0.6
Aperture f/16.0
Focal Length 17 mm
ISO Speed 100
Exposure Bias 0 EV

I was using a polarizer during this time, but I honestly don't remember if I used one for this specific shot or not. I'm thinking I did.
__________________
Photoblog Subscribe here!
Flickr
500px

In landscape photography, when you shoot is more important than where you shoot.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 08-13-2011, 09:07 PM
Doug Sundseth's Avatar
Not quite older than dirt
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Thornton, Colorado, USA
Posts: 1,576
Default

I really like the water here. Your exposure time was well chosen and the shapes work well.

I like the trees in the upper left of the photo. The shapes and contrast work well in B&W.

I don't much care for the bushes at the top center and right of the photo. In B&W they merge to a barely relieved medium gray for me.

The rock in the stream is interesting, but since it intersects the bank in the image, it's hard to see the shape well.

I'd like the far bank to be either horizontal in the photo or more obviously diagonal. The current angle is close enough to horizontal that it gives me a bit of a tilted feeling.

Possible recommendation: Move downstream a bit (and ideally up as well) and possibly use a longer lens to put the rock in front of the more interesting vegetation, give it separation from the far bank, and increase the diagonal effect of the far bank.

Alternatively, find a rock nearer your bank for more foreground interest (though the water shapes might be enough to carry the composition without anything else) and compose the background to maintain interest through the depth of the image.
__________________
Flickr
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 08-15-2011, 03:24 AM
EOBeav's Avatar
Inland Northwest Photog
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,074
Default

Thanks for your helpful comments, Doug. My main concern ran along those lines as well. I wondered how well that rock fit in this image, or if I would have been better off rotating my camera to the left and leaving it out altogether.
__________________
Photoblog Subscribe here!
Flickr
500px

In landscape photography, when you shoot is more important than where you shoot.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 08-15-2011, 04:15 AM
Living the life!
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Cairns, Australia
Posts: 26
Default

I really love the lines of the water, it works well in BW, the title is perfect. I have to agree with the rock being out of place. I think your right, if you turned to your left and omitted the rock all together it would make for a better composed shot. Great Location.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 08-16-2011, 06:33 PM
milosh's Avatar
A photo opportunist..
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Bosnia & Herzegovina
Posts: 1,554
Default

I agree with the comments about the rock, but I also find the image to be unbalanced, the upper portion constantly draws my attention away from the river. I would try to frame it differently, keeping in mind both the rock and the visual mass of elements.
__________________
Nikon D60 + Nikkor 18-105mm f/3.5-5.6 DX + Nikkor 35mm f/1.8 DX + Tamron AdaptAll 80-210mm f/3.8 Macro

Flickr
Webshots
500px
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 08-17-2011, 02:09 AM
EOBeav's Avatar
Inland Northwest Photog
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,074
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by milosh View Post
keeping in mind both the rock and the visual mass of elements.
??????????????????????????????
__________________
Photoblog Subscribe here!
Flickr
500px

In landscape photography, when you shoot is more important than where you shoot.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 08-17-2011, 03:45 AM
dbright007's Avatar
I'm new here!
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 16
Default

I think he may be saying what I was thinking.. the river itself with just the rock is a great and powerful image. Very well done. But that perhaps you don't even need all the foliage in the top half.
Beauty of the shot is the bottom half, the top just distracts in B/W. In color, maybe a different story.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 08-17-2011, 04:46 AM
milosh's Avatar
A photo opportunist..
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Bosnia & Herzegovina
Posts: 1,554
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dbright007 View Post
I think he may be saying what I was thinking.. the river itself with just the rock is a great and powerful image. Very well done. But that perhaps you don't even need all the foliage in the top half.
Beauty of the shot is the bottom half, the top just distracts in B/W. In color, maybe a different story.
Exactly! The upper portion is distracting, but you still need it. If you were to shoot the river leaving out the upper bank, it wouldn't feel right, would it? You need the upper bank to provide a sense of placement and common sense for the river, but since the bank has so much detail, showing too much of it can detract from the river. I would have to experiment in the field, but I guess you should use a longer focal length or just change the angle of your camera.
__________________
Nikon D60 + Nikkor 18-105mm f/3.5-5.6 DX + Nikkor 35mm f/1.8 DX + Tamron AdaptAll 80-210mm f/3.8 Macro

Flickr
Webshots
500px
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 08-17-2011, 04:09 PM
EOBeav's Avatar
Inland Northwest Photog
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,074
Default

All good comments. In the rivers and streams where I live, .5 to 1 full second generally gives me some good results for water flow. The challenge for me as a photog is framing it in a scene that makes sense aesthetically and allows for other elements to complement it.
__________________
Photoblog Subscribe here!
Flickr
500px

In landscape photography, when you shoot is more important than where you shoot.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

What’s Your Preference?

Daily Digest

Each day we send out a quick email to thousands of DPS readers to notify them of updates. This email is just short excerpt of the first few lines of our latest post with a link if you want to read it all. You can unsubscribe from this this service at any time.

This service is provided by a third party (Feedburner) and you can subscribe to it by leaving your email address in the following field and confirming your subscription when you get an email asking you to do so.

Enter your email address for
Daily Updates:

Weekly Summary

For those wanting a weekly summary of what happens on this site this free email newsletter is probably your best option. It includes a summary of the tips posted to the site each week. This newsletter is subscribed to by over 25000 readers (many who also subscribe to the other options above) - come join the community!

To subscribe to this weekly newsletter simply add your email address to the following field and then follow the confirmation prompts. You will be able to unsubscribe at any time.

Enter your email address for
Free Weekly Newsletter:

 
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.0