#1 (permalink)  
Old 08-12-2011, 11:50 AM
ACDavis85's Avatar
Ready for Football.
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Owings Mills, MD
Posts: 56
Default Large fountain at Baltimore's Inner Harbor

This is a large fountain at the Inner Harbor, Baltimore. The shot is desaturated, except for the blue in the 'pool' areas. I can post the original version if requested.

Please tell me your opinions on the long exposure effect on the spraying water. I like the foggy-ness that you get from that, but can I improve that technique to achieve a greater effect? I've heard people say it looks like ice...which isn't the effect I was looking for.

Exif Data:
Aperture: f22
Exposure: 1/2sec
Focal Length: 60mm
Flash: No
ISO: 100

Thanks!
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Fountain Desat Hi-res 1.1.jpg (605.8 KB, 50 views)
__________________
-Adam

Sony α700
| 18-70mm f4-5.6 | 18-200mm f3.5-6.3 |
| 75-300mm f4.5-5.6 | 70-210mm f4 "Beer Can" | 35-70mm f4 |

Last edited by ACDavis85; 08-12-2011 at 11:55 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 08-12-2011, 06:26 PM
Krusty79's Avatar
Smart ass (_e=mc2_)
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 3,364
Default

What effect are you trying to achieve then? I can't tell if your subject is the different shapes and textures, the water or the blue areas. I don't get the connection between the selective coloring and the "foggy-ness" of the fountain?!? Was the selective coloring supposed to enhance that effect?

Go Raiders!!!
__________________
GREG - Canon XS with 18-55 kit
flickr
flickriver
My 500px
"You can't be young forever, but you can always be immature." - Larry Andersen.

Last edited by Krusty79; 08-12-2011 at 06:29 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 08-12-2011, 06:32 PM
ACDavis85's Avatar
Ready for Football.
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Owings Mills, MD
Posts: 56
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Krusty79 View Post
What effect are you trying to achieve? I can't tell if your subject is the different shapes and textures, the water or the blue areas. I don't get the connection between the selective coloring and the "foggy-ness" of the fountain?!? Was the selective coloring supposed to enhance that effect?

Go Raiders!!!
I think the water is the main subject here. The spraying/falling portions to be precise.

The effect I was trying to achieve IS the foggyness. There's no real 'connection' between that and the isolation of color...I did that only because I didn't like the colors of the fountain as they were. However the blue, I thought, popped a bit. I liked having that color in there as it was a nice blue where as the rest of the fountain is a dull red-ish brick. But I don't think the effect is enhanced by the desaturation. If I'm being perfectly honest, being new to photography, and post-processing, I was playing with the color selection in GIMP, and this combination struck me more than the original.

Also, Go Colts!
__________________
-Adam

Sony α700
| 18-70mm f4-5.6 | 18-200mm f3.5-6.3 |
| 75-300mm f4.5-5.6 | 70-210mm f4 "Beer Can" | 35-70mm f4 |

Last edited by ACDavis85; 08-12-2011 at 06:45 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 08-12-2011, 07:16 PM
Krusty79's Avatar
Smart ass (_e=mc2_)
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 3,364
Default

Oh yeah, I should have read your post more carefully. Well, I'm no expert on water shots, but the longer your exposure, the smoother the water is going to look. I don't know if that equates to "foggy-ness," though. I guess it would enhance that effect if you could enhance the mist around the water. I'm not sure how to do that, though. Maybe playing around with a Curves adjustment?

Usually when people use selective coloring, they do it because they want to draw attention to the colored part(s), so that is usually the subject of the shot. I would try not to overuse that effect.
__________________
GREG - Canon XS with 18-55 kit
flickr
flickriver
My 500px
"You can't be young forever, but you can always be immature." - Larry Andersen.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 08-12-2011, 08:26 PM
ACDavis85's Avatar
Ready for Football.
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Owings Mills, MD
Posts: 56
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Krusty79 View Post
Oh yeah, I should have read your post more carefully. Well, I'm no expert on water shots, but the longer your exposure, the smoother the water is going to look. I don't know if that equates to "foggy-ness," though. I guess it would enhance that effect if you could enhance the mist around the water. I'm not sure how to do that, though. Maybe playing around with a Curves adjustment?
No worries, I apologize if it wasn't clear. I've read about the longer exposures on falling water to create that smokey/foggy 'texture', which is why I took the longer exposure shot here. I imagine you're correct though...if the spray was finer, it may increase that effect.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Krusty79 View Post
Usually when people use selective coloring, they do it because they want to draw attention to the colored part(s), so that is usually the subject of the shot. I would try not to overuse that effect.
Good advice, I'm sure. I will keep that in mind. Although, I guess you could say that I did intend to bring more attention to the blue, as it tends to go hand-in-hand with water. I did do another shot, where I used selective coloring. It's of a pink door in a room at an abandoned hospital. The door is crooked in the door way (behind it) and was most certainly the subject of that picture. So understanding what you mean there, I'll certainly keep that in mind. Thanks.
__________________
-Adam

Sony α700
| 18-70mm f4-5.6 | 18-200mm f3.5-6.3 |
| 75-300mm f4.5-5.6 | 70-210mm f4 "Beer Can" | 35-70mm f4 |
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 08-12-2011, 08:56 PM
EOBeav's Avatar
Inland Northwest Photog
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,074
Default

Yeah, I'm not going for the selective coloring here.
__________________
Photoblog Subscribe here!
Flickr
500px

In landscape photography, when you shoot is more important than where you shoot.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 08-13-2011, 11:32 PM
dPS Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 207
Default

I think there's potential in the shot. If you were to go back to the original & crop it very carefully (making sure the strong vertical lines were vertical). Then used a more subtle removal of colour that brings out the slightly brutal architecture without the 'toilet cleanser' blue, that might work?
The contrast between the harsh, blocky concrete & the classy looking shop in the background is nice.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

What’s Your Preference?

Daily Digest

Each day we send out a quick email to thousands of DPS readers to notify them of updates. This email is just short excerpt of the first few lines of our latest post with a link if you want to read it all. You can unsubscribe from this this service at any time.

This service is provided by a third party (Feedburner) and you can subscribe to it by leaving your email address in the following field and confirming your subscription when you get an email asking you to do so.

Enter your email address for
Daily Updates:

Weekly Summary

For those wanting a weekly summary of what happens on this site this free email newsletter is probably your best option. It includes a summary of the tips posted to the site each week. This newsletter is subscribed to by over 25000 readers (many who also subscribe to the other options above) - come join the community!

To subscribe to this weekly newsletter simply add your email address to the following field and then follow the confirmation prompts. You will be able to unsubscribe at any time.

Enter your email address for
Free Weekly Newsletter:

 
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.0