#1 (permalink)  
Old 07-20-2011, 09:00 PM
I'm new here!
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Washington State
Posts: 9
Default Waterfall - Am I on to something or is this generic?

This summer I decided to teach myself landscape photography and figured that waterfalls were a good place to start. I am in need of some constructive critique of my efforts.

Please understand that I fully appreciate a blunt and honest review...I am need of your help if I am to improve. So please do not hold back you comments to make me feel better...My wife does a decent job of saying "oh that picture looks pretty"...

Specifically I am after the following feedback, though I do appreciate all thoughts:

1) Composition: What elements of this photo distracts or devalues?
2) Exposure: Over, under, acceptable?
3) Ultimately I am trying to get from, "gee look a waterfall" to "wow, you took that"! I am never going to make money from my photos, but I do wonder if I might enter a shot one day into a contest...what do I need to do to push these to the next level?

Thank you so much for your time and comments.


Nikon D80, 18-55, 1/2 sec, f/20, ISO 200
__________________
Nikon D-80
AF-S 18-55 mm 3.5-5.6G VR
AF-S 70-300 mm 4.5-5.6G VR
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 07-20-2011, 09:38 PM
Krusty79's Avatar
Smart ass (_e=mc2_)
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 3,364
Default

I'd say you're off to a pretty good start. Regarding the composition, I find the most of the compelling waterfall shots are taken from more of a straight-on angle instead of off to the side. So, if you could have moved a bit to the left, that would accomplish that. It also helps to have some foreground interest, like a rock, to help lead the viewer's eye into the image. Your exposure looks pretty good. You could do some dodging or layer masking to brighten up the dark areas a little. You're on the right track, though.
__________________
GREG - Canon XS with 18-55 kit
flickr
flickriver
My 500px
"You can't be young forever, but you can always be immature." - Larry Andersen.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 07-20-2011, 10:07 PM
dPS Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 88
Default

Gorgeous shot.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 07-21-2011, 02:40 AM
Corey Thompson's Avatar
dPS Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Orange County, California
Posts: 358
Default

Definitely a great shot. A little exposure blending could help out great with some of the dark areas. I recently stumbled on this series of articles and found it to be quite helpful.

Exposure Blending | Christopher O'Donnell
__________________
Corey
Canon 40D|ef-s 10-22mm|35mm f/2.0|50mm f/1.4|85mm f/1.8
www.coreythompsonphotography.com
Follow me on Flickr
Follow me on Google+
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 07-21-2011, 07:15 AM
NgaiHill's Avatar
Far Too Snap Happy
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Otago, New Zealand
Posts: 2,670
Default

Very nice shot, I like how the old fallen logs frame the waterfall.
However it doesn't seem all that sharp all the way through, assume you shot from a tripod?
__________________
LISA
Canon EOS 1000D, 18-55mm & 75-300 mm kit lens for the flash stuff.
Olympus Tough 8010, waterproof, shockproof compact P&S - great for the kids.


Flickr
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 07-21-2011, 10:30 AM
milosh's Avatar
A photo opportunist..
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Bosnia & Herzegovina
Posts: 1,554
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jbaseball2001 View Post
Specifically I am after the following feedback, though I do appreciate all thoughts:

1) Composition: What elements of this photo distracts or devalues?
2) Exposure: Over, under, acceptable?
3) Ultimately I am trying to get from, "gee look a waterfall" to "wow, you took that"! I am never going to make money from my photos, but I do wonder if I might enter a shot one day into a contest...what do I need to do to push these to the next level?
1) I agree with what Krusty said about composition. I think the scenery is amazing but I would like to see a more head-on shot of the waterfall. I assume you wanted to include the whole flow of the river from one corner of your frame to another, but you can also create that sense of dynamics with a more straight-on view. Too dark and too bright areas in a photo tend to act as magnets for our attention and pull it away from the subject. For me, this is the case with underexposed lower right corner and that underexposed area under the log in the bottom of the frame. Also, I would like to see less of that lush green area above the waterfall (upper left corner). Although it is very nice, it doesn't do much for your subject.

2) I think the exposure of water and green areas (excluding the ones mentioned above) is good, they're not overexposed. Maybe a small change in white balance would render the water even whiter than it is now. I also think the saturation of the grass and moss is fine.

3) Read and remember what others tell you, and then do your best to apply that when shooting. And keep posting here for critique.

4) If light situation permits, try not to use apertures smaller than f16 because of diffraction which impacts your image quality. And I'm not sure is the native ISO value for your D80 ISO 100 or 200, but you should generally try to use the lowest value available.

5) Your photo is blurry and I wouldn't say that was caused by camera movement, perhaps your lens wasn't focused properly..
__________________
Nikon D60 + Nikkor 18-105mm f/3.5-5.6 DX + Nikkor 35mm f/1.8 DX + Tamron AdaptAll 80-210mm f/3.8 Macro

Flickr
Webshots
500px
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 07-21-2011, 11:43 AM
dPS Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 339
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Corey Thompson View Post
Definitely a great shot. A little exposure blending could help out great with some of the dark areas. I recently stumbled on this series of articles and found it to be quite helpful.

Exposure Blending | Christopher O'Donnell
All good shot i would agree a better composition would be from the left, with the river leading into the waterfall

Thanks for the link great stuff

all the best
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 07-21-2011, 08:54 PM
I'm new here!
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Washington State
Posts: 9
Default

I cannot say thank you enough to all of you who have responded.

I literally see the photo completely differently after you reviews!

I am lucky enough to be heading out again next week for a full 14 hours of shooting...I have already written much of your advice in my notebook and will be reffering to it often as I shoot.

I have one other shot that I will post in a new thread from an area up stream...If you are so inclinded, I would love to hear your comments...

Again thank you to all for your time, knowledge, and candour...if anyone else has thoughts, my ears are wide open!

Thanks!!!
__________________
Nikon D-80
AF-S 18-55 mm 3.5-5.6G VR
AF-S 70-300 mm 4.5-5.6G VR
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 07-22-2011, 07:43 AM
milosh's Avatar
A photo opportunist..
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Bosnia & Herzegovina
Posts: 1,554
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jbaseball2001 View Post
...if anyone else has thoughts, my ears are wide open!

Thanks!!!
One very important: spend more (or at least as much) time on finding a good composition than on shooting it. People usually just rush and click away. You need to take your time, ask yourself a few questions, like what is your main subject, what are your other subjects, how big does your main subject needs to be, then experiment with different points of view and different angles. After that, look for things that are not contributing to the shot and try to exclude them.
__________________
Nikon D60 + Nikkor 18-105mm f/3.5-5.6 DX + Nikkor 35mm f/1.8 DX + Tamron AdaptAll 80-210mm f/3.8 Macro

Flickr
Webshots
500px
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 07-22-2011, 11:00 PM
EOBeav's Avatar
Inland Northwest Photog
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,074
Default

Without seeing a larger image, it looks a little soft, and I wonder if that has something to do with such a narrow aperture value. For me, I try to stick between f/11 and f/16 when I'm doing waterfall shots. Also, as long as you're using a tripod, might as well go to ISO 100. It will lengthen your shutter time, but probably not so much that you blow out those hot spots. Then again, you may have already thought that one through on location and settled on this ISO setting accordingly.
__________________
Photoblog Subscribe here!
Flickr
500px

In landscape photography, when you shoot is more important than where you shoot.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
nature, water, waterfall

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

What’s Your Preference?

Daily Digest

Each day we send out a quick email to thousands of DPS readers to notify them of updates. This email is just short excerpt of the first few lines of our latest post with a link if you want to read it all. You can unsubscribe from this this service at any time.

This service is provided by a third party (Feedburner) and you can subscribe to it by leaving your email address in the following field and confirming your subscription when you get an email asking you to do so.

Enter your email address for
Daily Updates:

Weekly Summary

For those wanting a weekly summary of what happens on this site this free email newsletter is probably your best option. It includes a summary of the tips posted to the site each week. This newsletter is subscribed to by over 25000 readers (many who also subscribe to the other options above) - come join the community!

To subscribe to this weekly newsletter simply add your email address to the following field and then follow the confirmation prompts. You will be able to unsubscribe at any time.

Enter your email address for
Free Weekly Newsletter:

 
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.0