|
|||
|
|
|
||||
|
As always, I have to preface my comments with the "I'm a newbie" disclaimer, but...
I love this shot. I think the exposure is great.... The water is very bright, so it commands attention as the subject, but there's plenty of detail in the surrounding area. This adds texture to the image, and the tangle of needles and branches provides an interesting contrast to the silky smooth water. I also like the framing. It provides context for the photo... a sense of where the water comes from. And the top of the photo is bright, but not so much as to distract from the subject.
__________________
Cameras: Canon 5D, Panasonic Canon S95 Lenses: 50mm f/1.8, 28mm f/1.8 Flickr stream. |
|
||||
|
The exposure looks pretty good, maybe a touch hot on the background--just a little.
Were you using ND filters or just the small aperture? Your thinking on cropping the top might be good, try it and see? It's just a little bit distracting to me, since it's so bright. I feel like the composition could be a little bit stronger. Right now it's just kind of there. I don't have any strong point of interest. Maybe getting closer and shooting some details of the waterfall would give you some interesting images? If you can go back, try a different time of day too. The light is a little flat, though it isn't harsh, so that's good.
__________________
JamieDePould.com + OneYearPhoto.com Nikon D300, D700, Sony NEX5n Zeiss 2/25; 1.4/50; 1.4/85 Please read the rules before posting a critique thread. Rules here. |
|
|||
|
Thanks jdepould. I was not using any filters. I actually don't have any. Could an ND filter have helped me here? I really don't know much about filters.
I will try cropping. It is a place that I can go back to. I will try and make it back during a different time of day. Can you please explain what you mean about the light being a little flat? Thanks again. |
|
||||
|
Sunset light has a lot more character, it looks very different, than midday light. The light here doesn't really add anything to the image, it's just there.
ND filters are often used to achieve the soft water effect, because they let you use a longer shutter speed without overexposing the image.
__________________
JamieDePould.com + OneYearPhoto.com Nikon D300, D700, Sony NEX5n Zeiss 2/25; 1.4/50; 1.4/85 Please read the rules before posting a critique thread. Rules here. |
|
||||
|
I agree with Jamie...flat light and maybe a slightly different crop. Plus it is just a bit overexposed on the upper portion. Otherwise it's a neat shot.
"Flat" simply means there is no contrast. Light during the middle of the day is shining (for the most part) from directly overhead or close to it. This produces shadows that are only under objects. Light very early or late in the day is coming much more from the side, producing longer shadows...which produces more depth to a photo. Plus the light is also more "golden" and much less harsh which makes exposures much more pleasing. A graduated neutral density filter (or ND grad for short) would definitely help here. It's a rectangular filter that's half clear and half shaded (kind of like sunglasses but not polarized). The transition between shaded and clear is feathered. In your case, you would place the shaded area over the upper portion of the image with the transition zone on top of the horizontal log. What this will do is "push back" the intensity of the upper portion and bring it closer to they dynamic range of the lower, darker portion of the image. All in all, your image is pretty cool. You did well with your long exposure. Only thing I might recommend is also trying a standard neutral density filter (not graduated...completely shaded). These are great for water shots as they allow you to slow down your shutter speed without having to use such a small aperture (which can cause diffraction and soften an image). Hope that helps!
__________________
Cameras: Pentax K5, K20D, K10D, *istDL, ZX-7, ZX-L Eagle Vista Photography - Flickr - Pentax Gallery "Anybody can make the simple complicated. Creativity is making the complicated simple." Charlie Mingus |
|
|||
|
@navcom - Thank you very much for you explanation about using the ND filter and about how different light would affect this shot. I really appreciate you taking the time to explain this.
|
|
||||
|
I was actually referring to non-graduated ND filters (solid tint, no variation), though a grad makes sense here too.
__________________
JamieDePould.com + OneYearPhoto.com Nikon D300, D700, Sony NEX5n Zeiss 2/25; 1.4/50; 1.4/85 Please read the rules before posting a critique thread. Rules here. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Each day we send out a quick email to thousands of DPS readers to notify them of updates. This email is just short excerpt of the first few lines of our latest post with a link if you want to read it all. You can unsubscribe from this this service at any time.
This service is provided by a third party (Feedburner) and you can subscribe to it by leaving your email address in the following field and confirming your subscription when you get an email asking you to do so.
Enter your email address for
Daily Updates:
For those wanting a weekly summary of what happens on this site this free email newsletter is probably your best option. It includes a summary of the tips posted to the site each week. This newsletter is subscribed to by over 25000 readers (many who also subscribe to the other options above) - come join the community!
To subscribe to this weekly newsletter simply add your email address to the following field and then follow the confirmation prompts. You will be able to unsubscribe at any time.
Enter your email address for
Free Weekly Newsletter: