? too much

[douglas]

I posted this yesterday but it seems to have disappeared into cyber space...try again
This was a raw image converted to jpg after "fixing"in light room.



Did I overdo the increase in vibrance and saturation?

[Rehesan]

Eventhough you didn´t mention the exif data, I would say: it looks good to me, I do not see it oversaturated in anyway.

I think it is required by rules to post the exif data in order to get a critique.

Cheers!

[douglas]

exif data
Exif data
Camera Olympus E-410
Exposure 0.002 sec (1/640)
Aperture f/5.6
ISO Speed 100
Image Description OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA
Exposure Program Manual
Date and Time (Original) 2010:10:27 12:04:18-04:00
Date and Time (Digitized) 2010:10:27 12:04:18
Max Aperture Value 3.5nt
Exposure Mode Manual
White Balance Auto
Digital Zoom Ratio 1
Focal Length In35mm Format 42 mm
Scene Capture Type Standard
Gain Control None
Contrast Normal
Saturation Normal
Sharpness Soft
Compression JPEG (old-style)

XMPToolkit Adobe XMP Core 4.2-c020 1.124078, Tue Sep 11 2007 23:21:40
Creator Tool Adobe Photoshop Lightroom

[windrider86]

I dont think so. In fact I'd love to see the yellows even more vibrant. And the house cropped out

[sk66]

Nah, it's fine. I just think it's too busy and lacking a bit of "focus" (not actual focus but "subject focus").

[knixpix]

The colours are awesome, I would have used the bridge as the focal point, keeping as much as the reflections in the shot as poss, taking out the house poss or bringing it up front more.