|
|||
|
Hi, I'm trying to add impact without changng the character, the moodyness, of the image too much.
I suspect that this may be better done with more local contrast rather than simply pushing more saturation into it. If you have any specific suggestions, I'd love to hear them! Thank you in advance! ![]() Camera Canon EOS 450D Exposure 4 sec Aperture f/11.0 Focal Length 10 mm ISO Speed 100 Exposure Bias 0 EV Flash Off, Did not fire X-Resolution 240 dpi Y-Resolution 240 dpi Orientation Horizontal (normal) Software Adobe Photoshop CS3 Windows Date and Time (Modified) 2010:09:16 23:13:54 Artist Image copyright Alwyn J Cooper Exposure Program Manual Date and Time (Original) 2010:08:19 11:47:11.92+01:00 Date and Time (Digitized) 2010:08:19 11:47:11 Max Aperture Value 4.0 Subject Distance 2.09 m Metering Mode Multi-segment Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard By-line Image copyright Alwyn J Cooper Photoshop Quality 12 Photoshop Format Standard Progressive Scans 3 Scans
__________________
Please visit My Flickr stream Last edited by alwyncooper; 09-20-2010 at 01:31 PM. |
|
||||
|
Hi there! Please take a look at the critique forum rules and edit your post so we can get more info. Having items such as a specific question and your EXIF info will help us help you. Thanks!
__________________
Cameras: Pentax K5, K20D, K10D, *istDL, ZX-7, ZX-L Eagle Vista Photography - Flickr - Pentax Gallery "Anybody can make the simple complicated. Creativity is making the complicated simple." Charlie Mingus |
|
||||
|
I love this - soft and moody ... I wouldn't change it
__________________
http://untamednewyork.smugmug.com/ Canon 7D; Canon Rebel XSi; Tamron 18-270; 50mm 1.4; Canon 400mm 5.6, Canon 100mm Macro, Sigma 10-20mm, Speedlight 580EX - and the list keeps growing [/SIZE]
|
|
||||
|
I think your contrast looks pretty good as it is. If you add too much more, you will start crossing the line from a natural look to an illustration or painting look. I do see some halos starting from the post processing of the two images. I also suspect this might be the origin of your sky noise but I'm not sure without seeing the originals.
Overall it's a really nice composition. It's also a good example of using HDR relatively sparingly to conquer that dynamic range demon but yet add some mood. ![]() Nice job!
__________________
Cameras: Pentax K5, K20D, K10D, *istDL, ZX-7, ZX-L Eagle Vista Photography - Flickr - Pentax Gallery "Anybody can make the simple complicated. Creativity is making the complicated simple." Charlie Mingus |
|
|||
|
Thanks for the kind words and the wise words.
I'll have to keep on top of the halos (haloes?) in future; they may be a by-product of the toning/masking process I used. I suspect the noise is from pushing the "noise channel" too hard w/r/t saturation and then sharpening it :-( I appreciate you all taking the time to comment!
__________________
Please visit My Flickr stream |
|
||||
|
Mike...controlling your dynamic range is the secret to getting good color rendition. Your camera can't get good exposure if the dynamic range is more than it can handle. Neutral density filters are the best answer for quality. Use a solid ND to slow the shutter down if you can't get it slow enough without venturing into super-small apertures and diffraction. Use an ND grad to control the dynamic range and push back the sky so it keeps it's colors while getting a good exposure on the foreground.
Also, HDR bracketing (Photomatix or layering in Photoshop, et al) is another option such as Alwyn did here. I prefer filters as I think they produce better quality results but that's my opinion. HDR software techniques certainly have their place and produce their own unique quality.
__________________
Cameras: Pentax K5, K20D, K10D, *istDL, ZX-7, ZX-L Eagle Vista Photography - Flickr - Pentax Gallery "Anybody can make the simple complicated. Creativity is making the complicated simple." Charlie Mingus |
|
|||
|
Quote:
The whiteness in mine is the "sparkle" of the water reflection of the lighter part of the sky. During the day. Sea water shows grey when subject to long exposures over 1 min. White if you are facing the light source. Don't compare mine to yours, as they were taken in greatly different conditions, and yours is a very nice image! If you want flatter water, you have to go beyond 2 minutes exposure; and for the "mystical fog" you have to have waves, with the sun (or bright cloud) sparkling on 'em. The fog is in fact the ghost image of the waves moving. To do this you will need a very dark Neutral Density filter such as the B+W ND110 - this is what I used. Hope this helps!
__________________
Please visit My Flickr stream |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| longexposure, rocks, sea, seascape |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Each day we send out a quick email to thousands of DPS readers to notify them of updates. This email is just short excerpt of the first few lines of our latest post with a link if you want to read it all. You can unsubscribe from this this service at any time.
This service is provided by a third party (Feedburner) and you can subscribe to it by leaving your email address in the following field and confirming your subscription when you get an email asking you to do so.
Enter your email address for
Daily Updates:
For those wanting a weekly summary of what happens on this site this free email newsletter is probably your best option. It includes a summary of the tips posted to the site each week. This newsletter is subscribed to by over 25000 readers (many who also subscribe to the other options above) - come join the community!
To subscribe to this weekly newsletter simply add your email address to the following field and then follow the confirmation prompts. You will be able to unsubscribe at any time.
Enter your email address for
Free Weekly Newsletter: