|
||||
|
Sterling;
Yeah, I am just learning the software. One thing I notice is what looks good in a larger size looks a little washed out in a smaller size. maybe I overcompensated? I tried to take out some yellow, can you tell the difference? It looks worse, I suck at color balancing! ![]() fstopMike; That's a great idea! Thanks for the input!
__________________
Nikon D90, Nikon 18-55vr & 55-200vr, coveting a Sigma 10-20mm! Panasonic GF1 20mm f1.7 & 14-45mm Nokia N8 12MP Camera Phone Lowepro EX180, Bogen 3001 tripod, Nodal Ninja III Pano Head Last edited by Doctor Atomo; 02-12-2010 at 07:06 PM. |
|
||||
|
I had a similar situation some years ago. I had a tree in my back yard that was just begging to be photographed. However, nothing I tried worked. By itself it was simply to plain to be of any interest. I knew I was going to have just the right situation to make my shot work. One morning a fog had rolled in as the sun came up. The tree was surrounded in an orange fog and I had my shot. It was a family favorite for years after that.
I don't know what conditions will work best for you, but I suspect the day will come when all of the planets will align (so to speak) and your shot will be there waiting for you. |
|
||||
|
I agree that the colours don't look right (btw I think the first of the 2 above looks better). To me it just looks like the levels are wrong, which is easily fixed - have you checked the histogram? (especially at the black end)
I assume you're using photoshop, in which case somewhere there will be a "Levels" dialogue and in there there should be an "Auto" button, which is a good place to start. This will move the light and dark points on the histogram to what the software thinks are the right points... sometimes it comes out well, sometimes not so well and you may need to intervene, but as I say it's a good place to start. (Personally I'm a gimp user - if you are too, the Levels dialogue is in the Colours menu; don't know where it is in photoshop. In gimp the Auto function works separately on the R G & B channels and ignores the Luminosity channel, so that's where you need to look to see what it's done. I assume photoshop is the same but can't say from personal experience.) [Edit] oh, and yes I agree, it's a nice tree
__________________
Canon 7D Canon 24mm f/1.4 L ii, Canon 10-22mm, Tamron 28-300mm VC Flickr | Moscow Photo-Souvenir Project |
|
||||
|
Thanks, guys! Actually I am using a my trial version of Nikon NX2. I had Photoshop CS3 on my desktop, but it crashed & I have yet to reinstall. I like this NX2 software, but I need a lot of practice. I think I will go and read up on histograms!
Meanwhile, while I have your attention, do you like the composition better in the first image or in this one? ![]() My Muse Vertical Nikon D90, Nikon 18-55vr @42mm, f/6.3, 1/250th, ISO-200, exposure bias -0.3 step, minimal post processing in Nikon NX2 or this one? ![]() My Muse Wide Nikon D90, Nikon 18-55vr @18mm, f/11, 1/100th, ISO-200, exposure bias -0.3 step, minimal post processing in Nikon NX2 Thanks for the help!
__________________
Nikon D90, Nikon 18-55vr & 55-200vr, coveting a Sigma 10-20mm! Panasonic GF1 20mm f1.7 & 14-45mm Nokia N8 12MP Camera Phone Lowepro EX180, Bogen 3001 tripod, Nodal Ninja III Pano Head |
|
||||
|
Looking now, it looks like I Boosted the Color a little to much, what do you think? I always want to make it look like it looked to me at the time.
__________________
Nikon D90, Nikon 18-55vr & 55-200vr, coveting a Sigma 10-20mm! Panasonic GF1 20mm f1.7 & 14-45mm Nokia N8 12MP Camera Phone Lowepro EX180, Bogen 3001 tripod, Nodal Ninja III Pano Head |
|
||||
|
I like the original composition, and also the vertical variant. I think the one with the water in the foreground does not emphasise The Tree enough.
Hope you don't mind, I did a quick auto-levels-adjust on the original shot you posted, and it came up as per attachment. I think it came out ok, actually. It has stretched the colour range from the original so that the darkest parts become black and the lightest parts become white (which is basically all that the auto levels adjust function does). If anything the colours are a bit over-saturated now, but as you say this might just be because you boosted them already. Auto levels adjust is a really simple and quick adjustment you can do that tends to work well when you have a good range of colours in the shot, but can sometimes get it horribly wrong if the shot is dominated by unusual colour conditions, e.g. snow or night. And when I say it is quick, I mean *really* quick - all I did here was: open the image in gimp, pull up the Levels dialogue, hit the Auto button, click OK and save. No skill required
__________________
Canon 7D Canon 24mm f/1.4 L ii, Canon 10-22mm, Tamron 28-300mm VC Flickr | Moscow Photo-Souvenir Project |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Each day we send out a quick email to thousands of DPS readers to notify them of updates. This email is just short excerpt of the first few lines of our latest post with a link if you want to read it all. You can unsubscribe from this this service at any time.
This service is provided by a third party (Feedburner) and you can subscribe to it by leaving your email address in the following field and confirming your subscription when you get an email asking you to do so.
Enter your email address for
Daily Updates:
For those wanting a weekly summary of what happens on this site this free email newsletter is probably your best option. It includes a summary of the tips posted to the site each week. This newsletter is subscribed to by over 25000 readers (many who also subscribe to the other options above) - come join the community!
To subscribe to this weekly newsletter simply add your email address to the following field and then follow the confirmation prompts. You will be able to unsubscribe at any time.
Enter your email address for
Free Weekly Newsletter: