|
|||
|
First of all my name is Jay and I just bought a Canon t1i with the kit lens 18-55 and a Tamron 18-270 3.5-6.3 DI II with VC.
I took some pics of a HS soccer game and during the day they came out bright and clear but as the evening came on and they turned on the lights - my pics all became dark. Again, I'm a complete ROOKIE but no matter what I tried to change I didn't seem to have any better luck. So - I was looking in popphoto.com and they had some reviews on some economical flash units....having just spent a bunch on the camera and lenses.....how much would a flash help with evening shots of a soccer game with my 18-270 lens? |
|
||||
|
Hay Jaylitz000 and welcome to the site. Ms Tingelim is correct. A flash wouldn’t help in this particular situation. But learning the fundamentals of the camera would help tremendously. Learning how to get the right shutter speed, ISO and aperture will help you get the lighting right without a flash and with a little practice and balance of settings eliminate blur.
There are many threads in here on the topic to get you started and there is zero substitution for practice! Don’t wait till your next game to practice, play with the camera now, learn the settings and be ready to take great shots at your next game :0) Once again welcome to the site Warmly Christian
__________________
If you understand photography is like wine “ meaning not everyone has the same taste” only then do you have the right to be "constructive" in your criticism. ***** Its NOT ok to reedit my images WITHOUT permission***** |
|
||||
|
You're probably limiting the shutter speed to "freeze" action, and that only leaves you two other controls to jack up the exposure and grab more light: you can either increase your ISO, or you can open up your aperture.
But your 18-270 has a maximum aperture of 3.5-6.3. What that means is that the widest you can open the lens @18mm is f/3.5, and @270mm, the widest it can go is f/6.3. That's not particularly wide. So you can't get a shutter speed that's particularly fast without underexposing and getting dark images. You've got two options here. 1) blow money on a faster lens. A 70-200 f/2.8 lens is the usual go-to for folks shooting sports in low lighting conditions. These can be really expensive, but there are third-party options from Sigma/Tamron/Tokina that are in the $700-$800 range, rather than the $1500 range. ![]() Or 2) if you've maxed out your ISO, shoot RAW, underexpose, and then increase the exposure in post-production. This will drastically increase the amount of noise you'll have in an image, so you'll probably also want to invest in some noise reduction software. Cameras tend to need more light to see by than our eyes do.
__________________
I shoot with a Canon 5DmkII, 50D, and S90, and Pansonic G3. flickr stream and equipment list |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Each day we send out a quick email to thousands of DPS readers to notify them of updates. This email is just short excerpt of the first few lines of our latest post with a link if you want to read it all. You can unsubscribe from this this service at any time.
This service is provided by a third party (Feedburner) and you can subscribe to it by leaving your email address in the following field and confirming your subscription when you get an email asking you to do so.
Enter your email address for
Daily Updates:
For those wanting a weekly summary of what happens on this site this free email newsletter is probably your best option. It includes a summary of the tips posted to the site each week. This newsletter is subscribed to by over 25000 readers (many who also subscribe to the other options above) - come join the community!
To subscribe to this weekly newsletter simply add your email address to the following field and then follow the confirmation prompts. You will be able to unsubscribe at any time.
Enter your email address for
Free Weekly Newsletter: