#1 (permalink)  
Old 05-18-2009, 01:14 AM
conor5150's Avatar
dPS Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Bronx NY
Posts: 200
Default Lens Filters

I was told today that I should get a lens filter for my Nikon D60 , it'e the kit lens 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6G VR.

Now I was told to get primarily as protection for the lens itself from dust.dirt. Does that make sense?

Should I get one anyway , should I get a lens hood too?

Could you also advice me on what make I should get , looking at a budget price here....I guess $20 - 30 range.


Conor
__________________
Nikon D60 - SB-600 Speedlight - 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6G VR - 55-200mm f/4-5.6 VR - 35mm f/1.8

Flickr
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 05-18-2009, 01:28 AM
LoveMyRebel's Avatar
dPS Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: NorthEast Ohio
Posts: 66
Default

Whatever you do, stay away from Targus brand!

I recently got two Targus filters as a gift and decided to try them rather than hurt someone's feelings. The one had defective threading and I did not know this until I had it removed at a camera shop. However, in my efforts to remove it myself I had stripped the gears in my 75-300mm. I contacted the company in an effort to get them to cover a portion of the replacement/repair cost and in dealin with the company was shocked at how little they knew about lenses. They said they would have one of their techs repair my lens, but after their email asking me to take a photo of the stripped gears I decided that I was not going to let them near my lens!!
__________________

Felicia
Canon XTi, EFS 18-55mm, EF 50mm 1:1.8, EF 75-300mm
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 05-18-2009, 01:35 AM
dPS +1000 Club
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,914
Default

Hoya (HMC) & Tiffen UV for consumer lenses; B+W & Rodenstock UV for $$K lenses.

Last edited by LoveDSLR; 05-18-2009 at 02:46 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 05-18-2009, 01:40 AM
Not photogenic
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 823
Default

Whether or not to use a "protective" filter is a long-standing, continuously raging argument. Me, I'm on the "no filter" side.

If you do buy a filter, make it a good one (coated optics). Uncoated filters do not mix well with digital sensors. You'll lose contrast and—in some cases where there are bright spots or areas of light within the frame—get "ghost" images of those bright spots.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 05-18-2009, 02:08 AM
conor5150's Avatar
dPS Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Bronx NY
Posts: 200
Default

Thanks for the advice. I bought a cleaning kit instead. If I really don't understand what a filter can do to the pictures I take then I certainly don't need to have one for protection purposes.
__________________
Nikon D60 - SB-600 Speedlight - 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6G VR - 55-200mm f/4-5.6 VR - 35mm f/1.8

Flickr
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 05-18-2009, 02:15 AM
AlphaBjerke's Avatar
dPS Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Riverbank, CA (near Modesto)
Posts: 584
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doug Pardee View Post
Whether or not to use a "protective" filter is a long-standing, continuously raging argument. Me, I'm on the "no filter" side.

If you do buy a filter, make it a good one (coated optics). Uncoated filters do not mix well with digital sensors. You'll lose contrast and—in some cases where there are bright spots or areas of light within the frame—get "ghost" images of those bright spots.
I would definitely make sure you get one that is "multi-coated." If you are buying online, it is often hard to tell if it is a quality filter or not. I would definitely check with someone here before you waste money on an inferior filter like I did. I even called the Hoya people to find out exactly what part numbers and designations are on the good filters. For Hoya, if it is "G" series, don't touch it, it's junk. Any part number that starts with "B" is still not too hot. If the part number begins with "A," that is what you want. There are other designations, but as long as you avoid the "B" and the "G" in Hoya, you should have multi-coated.

It is silly to put a poor filter on your lens.
__________________
Web Site http://ebimagephoto.comFlickriver AlphaBjerke's Photos on FlickriverSony Alpha A200, 50mm/f1.7, 18-70mm, 75-300mm, Sigma 90mm 2.8 macro.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 05-18-2009, 02:46 AM
dPS +1000 Club
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,914
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AlphaBjerke View Post
I would definitely make sure you get one that is "multi-coated."
Good point. I didn't even know Hoya still makes non "multi-coated" filters.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 05-18-2009, 03:06 AM
dPS Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: saskatchewan, Canada
Posts: 104
Default

I've read to get a simple UV filter just as protection from bumps and knocks. It protects against scratches and means you can leave off the lens cap while running around taking random shots. I think they should just make clear ones! At any rate I like the idea and put one on all my lenses. I haven't noticed any degradation of image but I'm really too novice to have the discernment. i'd rather not have to replace a scratched lens.
__________________
This is my photostream on Flickr
Using pentax k200D
3 zoom/macro lenses (only 2 have autofocus), 2 50mm manual prime lenses, 3 asst wide angle lenses , 1 lens baby control freak lens with 21mm wide angle adapter. Novice DSLR user, creative interests. (google art rage)
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 05-18-2009, 03:32 AM
Rolling Stone's Avatar
For the love of freedom..
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Oregon
Posts: 636
Default

I got a cheap muti-coated UV filter for my lens. I'd rather pay another $25 for another filter than $600 for a lens. And it works fine.
__________________
Taking a shot at life.
Nikon D90-Nikkor AF-S/VR 18-200mm 1:3.5-5.6 G ED lens,Nikkor AF-S 50mm 1:1.4 G lens
Nikon GP-1 + Thinktank Streetwalker + PS CS4 + LR2
O.K. to edit + repost in DPS ONLY!
flickr
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 05-18-2009, 03:33 AM
dPS +1000 Club
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,914
Default

Here is another reason to use a filter. Quote from Canon site on EF50mm f/1.2L USM:

"By utilizing dust- and moisture-resistant construction (Fig. 3) in the lens mount, switch panel and focusing ring to prevent dust and water from reaching the interior, the lens can be used in harsh environments.
*This applies when the lens is used with a dust- and moisture-resistant EOS body and a filter is attached to the front of the lens."
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

What’s Your Preference?

Daily Digest

Each day we send out a quick email to thousands of DPS readers to notify them of updates. This email is just short excerpt of the first few lines of our latest post with a link if you want to read it all. You can unsubscribe from this this service at any time.

This service is provided by a third party (Feedburner) and you can subscribe to it by leaving your email address in the following field and confirming your subscription when you get an email asking you to do so.

Enter your email address for
Daily Updates:

Weekly Summary

For those wanting a weekly summary of what happens on this site this free email newsletter is probably your best option. It includes a summary of the tips posted to the site each week. This newsletter is subscribed to by over 25000 readers (many who also subscribe to the other options above) - come join the community!

To subscribe to this weekly newsletter simply add your email address to the following field and then follow the confirmation prompts. You will be able to unsubscribe at any time.

Enter your email address for
Free Weekly Newsletter:

 
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.0