|
|||
|
This glare has happened in a bunch of my pictures. I manage to photoshop it out but it takes ages and never looks as good as if it had just never happened. Does anyone know what's causing it or how to stop it? Here is one I photoshopped. The first image is the fixed one. Photo Album - Imgur
|
|
||||
|
Maybe Im blind, but I couldnt see the difference: it does look like there's some motion blur, and bloom from the overexposed background.
__________________
I am responsible for what I say; not what you understand. OsmosisStudios Gear List |
|
|||
|
Rather try and be less clumsy. Honestly, UV filters do more to ruin your photos than anything else, unless you're buying the really expensive ones.
If your lens has a lens hood, just leave it on. That way, you ensure that you always shoot with it on (which you should be doing anyway), and it also protects your lens. I have an 85mm 1.4G lens, which is quite an expensive chunk of glass, and I don't even have a filter on that thing. Remember - the more glass the light has to go through, the more your image quality is going to drop. Bare lens is the way to do it IMO.
__________________
I take photos - 500px |
|
||||
|
Get the main brand (the one who made the lens) one made specifically for the lens. Anything else is crap and runs the risk of vignetting and takes up the valuable filter thread
__________________
Jon ![]() FLICKR If you don't know where you're going, any road will get you there. D3100, Nikon N60, Canon Powershot, 28-803.5-5.6 D, Sigma 70-300 4-5.6 Macro |
|
||||
|
What type of UV filter are you using, Adoroam? And how much did you pay for it?
You can use UV filters successfully with few flaring issues excepting things like nighttime shots when you're shooting directly into a brighter light source, but it needs to be a filter of good quality. Specifically you need one that is a multi-coated filter, that is the filter's glass will have the same kinds of coatings on it that help to prevent flaring on the lens's elements themselves. Generally, if you paid less than $40 for something like a 58mm-sized filter it's not going to be multi-coated, and it's going to be more susceptible to flaring issues like the one you experienced. You can also forgo using UV filters and just use the lens hood as others have suggested. Although going this route it's probably a good idea to get your more valuable lenses insured. If you're removing one form of insurance from your lens, it's a good idea to back it up with another. I've used 3rd party hoods just fine myself (e.g. Pearstone), but those were the ones that were made specifically for a particular lens, so they would attach properly to the front bayonet mount.
__________________
My flickriver |
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Art: www.jamieorourke.co.uk Work: www.jamieorourkephotography.co.uk Work: Photo booth Hire in the West Midlands, and Wales Sony a200 Sony a580, Canon 500D, Photobooth
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| glare |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Each day we send out a quick email to thousands of DPS readers to notify them of updates. This email is just short excerpt of the first few lines of our latest post with a link if you want to read it all. You can unsubscribe from this this service at any time.
This service is provided by a third party (Feedburner) and you can subscribe to it by leaving your email address in the following field and confirming your subscription when you get an email asking you to do so.
Enter your email address for
Daily Updates:
For those wanting a weekly summary of what happens on this site this free email newsletter is probably your best option. It includes a summary of the tips posted to the site each week. This newsletter is subscribed to by over 25000 readers (many who also subscribe to the other options above) - come join the community!
To subscribe to this weekly newsletter simply add your email address to the following field and then follow the confirmation prompts. You will be able to unsubscribe at any time.
Enter your email address for
Free Weekly Newsletter: