#1 (permalink)  
Old 02-25-2011, 08:16 AM
candidrachel's Avatar
Photoholic
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Away with the fairies
Posts: 2,404
Default Mr Green Jeans & Sky Brothers

I've been reading my Understanding Exposure book and one aspect I'm not convinced by is the Sky Bros and Mr Green Jeans techniques. Does that really apply to digital? I imagine that if I took a meter reading from the blue sky then recomposed the shot to take a photo of my daughter then she would be really underexposed

Do these techniques really work. Its not like I can really try it out yet as we still have winter grey skies here and no sunsets.
__________________
http://www.flickr.com/photos/rachelgingell/

"Do not wait, the time will never be just right. Start where you stand and work with whatever tools you may have at your command, and better tools will be found as you go along" - Napoleon Hill
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 02-25-2011, 09:46 AM
BigFuzzy's Avatar
Mini-Mod
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Under a bridge, somewhere in northern Europe.
Posts: 2,746
Default

Well, if using flash and you want a properly exposed background/ambient light, you always expose for the "sky" and then use your flash to properly expose your subject/daughter.
Not sure if that fits into what you're asking as I don't have that book with me.. but that's a situation where you'd always expose for ambient/sky.
__________________
Al Borrelli Photography (being re-awesomefied.. pls be patient!)
I'll make you look good

Flickr | Twitter | Tumblr | about.me | Vimeo | 500Px
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 02-25-2011, 07:46 PM
milosh's Avatar
A photo opportunist..
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Bosnia & Herzegovina
Posts: 1,553
Default

Exactly what Fuzzy said. I don't have the book here either, but that's one of the two scenarios I can think of, when you would meter for the sky when taking a portrait. Then you would need to use something to fill in your subject (flash usually).

The other scenario is if you were shooting a silhouette. Then you wouldn't use the fill flash and your subject would be underexposed (it would be a silhouette).
__________________
Nikon D60 + Nikkor 18-105mm f/3.5-5.6 DX + Nikkor 35mm f/1.8 DX + Tamron AdaptAll 80-210mm f/3.8 Macro

Flickr
Webshots
500px
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

What’s Your Preference?

Daily Digest

Each day we send out a quick email to thousands of DPS readers to notify them of updates. This email is just short excerpt of the first few lines of our latest post with a link if you want to read it all. You can unsubscribe from this this service at any time.

This service is provided by a third party (Feedburner) and you can subscribe to it by leaving your email address in the following field and confirming your subscription when you get an email asking you to do so.

Enter your email address for
Daily Updates:

Weekly Summary

For those wanting a weekly summary of what happens on this site this free email newsletter is probably your best option. It includes a summary of the tips posted to the site each week. This newsletter is subscribed to by over 25000 readers (many who also subscribe to the other options above) - come join the community!

To subscribe to this weekly newsletter simply add your email address to the following field and then follow the confirmation prompts. You will be able to unsubscribe at any time.

Enter your email address for
Free Weekly Newsletter:

 
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.0