#1 (permalink)  
Old 10-11-2010, 02:45 PM
CharlieJ's Avatar
dPS +1000 Club
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,363
Question If you could spend $2500 on anything...

If you could spend $2500 on anything related to photography AND you were starting out with only one 8MP DSLR camera body, the kit lens, a medium grade tele-zoom(f/4~5.6), two batteries, 4 CF cards, a decent gear bag, a $50 tripod... and that's pretty much it.

The goal is to move forward with shooting portraits, action shots (mostly outdoors) and lifestyle photography (indoors & outdoors) as a part-time venture (at least for the time being).

IOW, would you buy another lens (if so, which one), a better tripod, a branded flash w/ umbrella/reflector, stand & remote trigger, or maybe another camera body?
__________________
CharlieJ RSS Feed
Canon 60D and Canon 350D
50mm prime f/1.8, M42 135mm f/2.8, 18~135mm f/3.5, 75~300mm f/4, 18~55mm kit & V3500 flash w/ trigger/receiver
CharlieJ's Facebook // My Flickr // CharlieJ's Blog/o/Foto
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 10-11-2010, 02:53 PM
think outside the box!
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Tel Aviv, Israel
Posts: 1,332
Default

I would go for a medium level body like the 50D and add a 70-200 f/2.8 L for portraits and action shots.
__________________
canon 40D | canon 5D MK II | 24-105mm f/4 IS USM | 70-200mm f/4 IS USM | 50mm f/1.8 II | 85mm f/1.8 USM | lensbaby composer

www.oriram.co.il | facebook
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 10-11-2010, 02:54 PM
Murtasma's Avatar
Critique Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 4,162
Default

I would spend that money some studio lighting gear like some alien bee units, light modifiers and a nice prime fast lens for portraits, new tripod and possibly even a new body. For 2500 bucks you could spend all that money on a single fast telephone lens and that's it. I think having lighting gear and a good prime lens would be a great way to spend 2500 bucks. You could get a 70 - 200 F2.8 IS or the new 70-200 F2.8 IS Lens but then you really wouldn't be left with much of anything.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 10-11-2010, 03:27 PM
Photoboothguy
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Good question.

Sell the current body for $300, netting you $2800.

Canon T2i - $800
2 580exII's - $800
Sigma 50mm f1.4 - $500
Sigma 24-70 f2.8 - $500
2 light stands, umbrellas, e-bay flash triggers, reflector - $200

That should be a good setup to get you going. I might sub out one of the 580exIIs for a ETTL flash trigger (like the Pixel TR-332) and a 430exII.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 10-11-2010, 03:35 PM
Mr Guy's Avatar
dPS +1000 Club
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 1,566
Default

If I was trying to specifically invest $2500 as a business expense and I had the following:

(1) 8MP DSLR camera body,
(1) the kit lens,
(1) a medium grade tele-zoom(f/4~5.6),
(2) batteries,
(4) CF cards,
a decent gear bag,
a $50 tripod

...then I'd plan on spending much more than $2500.

Here's the order I'd say you probably need to invest in things:

1. Determine if you have good local rental shops, if not, look at online renters. Spend some of that money developing a good relationship with local rental places if possible, and determine which have the best selection and are the most helpful to you. CameraLensRentals has literally saved me thousands in bad decisions.

2. Get a very good portrait length zoom. Depending on what you usually shoot, get a good, but not yet excellent, portrait zoom. Something like a Tamron or Sigma f/2.8 in the either 28-75 or 50-150 range.

3. If you don't have a good emergency local renter, you need a used second body.

4. Get a good 5 in 1 reflector, and learn to use it.

5. Get at least one good wireless off camera flash. You can start with optical slave modes, and wireless TLL if your camera supports it. Get a super clamp, a light stand, and a heavy duty gorilla pod, and a shoot through umbrella with detachable cover as your "light kit". The wireless strobist kits at mpex are actually a pretty good deal from what I've seen, if you need everything anyway: MPEX Strobist Kits


You should be able to do all that and only spend in the $1500 range. Put the rest away for the first thing you DIDN'T think of.
__________________

But Mom, Pentax IS rebellious
Pentax K-7, K20D
Pentax SMCP-FA 35mm f/2.0 AL -- Pentax SMC 50mm f/1.7 -- Pentax DA 50-200mm f/4-5.6 ED -- Sigma 28-70mm f/2.8 EX DG IF Aspherical -- Pentax DA 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 WR
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 10-11-2010, 03:39 PM
RLucas's Avatar
*Aum*
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Asheboro, NC
Posts: 3,851
Default

I am a Nikon guy, but the top of my wish list atm is,
70-200 f/2.8 $1500.00
105 f/2 DC $1000.00
I probably will not buy a new body till mine completely craps out.
__________________
Luke.
500px
facebook
flickr
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 10-11-2010, 05:09 PM
Izzy's Avatar
Thomas Neubauer
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Insane Asylum
Posts: 1,357
Default

Canon F2.8 28-300 (I am a fan of the super zooms) and a nifty fifty The left over I could make my rent.
__________________
Heavily medicated for your protection
Flickriver

http://www.photoblog.com/thomasneubauer/
http://thomasneubauer.com
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 10-11-2010, 06:48 PM
OsmosisStudios's Avatar
Don't Panic
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Mississauga / Ottawa
Posts: 11,351
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Izzy View Post
Canon F2.8 28-300 (I am a fan of the super zooms)
Considering a lens like this A) doesnt exist and B) would be absolutely gigantic, not to mention terrible, I'm gonna say "yeeeeaaaah... No".

Throw your budget into a 70-200 f/2.8 and be done with it.
__________________
I am responsible for what I say; not what you understand.
OsmosisStudios
Gear List
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 10-11-2010, 07:11 PM
candleman's Avatar
Bad at explaining
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Auckland , New Zealand
Posts: 5,918
Default

generally, i agree with Photoboothguy and Murtasma
for Portraits, go Strobist and get a good third party lens.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 10-11-2010, 07:20 PM
Photoboothguy
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OsmosisStudios View Post
Considering a lens like this A) doesnt exist and B) would be absolutely gigantic, not to mention terrible, I'm gonna say "yeeeeaaaah... No".

Throw your budget into a 70-200 f/2.8 and be done with it.
Amazon.com: Canon EF 28-300mm f/3.5-5.6L IS USM Lens: Camera & Photo
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

What’s Your Preference?

Daily Digest

Each day we send out a quick email to thousands of DPS readers to notify them of updates. This email is just short excerpt of the first few lines of our latest post with a link if you want to read it all. You can unsubscribe from this this service at any time.

This service is provided by a third party (Feedburner) and you can subscribe to it by leaving your email address in the following field and confirming your subscription when you get an email asking you to do so.

Enter your email address for
Daily Updates:

Weekly Summary

For those wanting a weekly summary of what happens on this site this free email newsletter is probably your best option. It includes a summary of the tips posted to the site each week. This newsletter is subscribed to by over 25000 readers (many who also subscribe to the other options above) - come join the community!

To subscribe to this weekly newsletter simply add your email address to the following field and then follow the confirmation prompts. You will be able to unsubscribe at any time.

Enter your email address for
Free Weekly Newsletter:

 
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.0