HDR Debate.

[klr]

Opened up a poll on my website if any of you are interested in talking about it or voting whether you like HDR or not.

http://www.kaylaross.com/

[i speak in math]

I like HDR, high dynamic range, and wish my dSLR's sensor had more range than it does and I wish my monitor could display a 32bit HDR. However, I hate terribly tone-mapped images that claim to be HDR. It seems your site and question reflects my opinion. I'm not sure why you would make a poll and then claim which side it right just below the question. Read up on bias questioning.

[klr]

Originally Posted by i speak in math

I like HDR, high dynamic range, and wish my dSLR's sensor had more range than it does and I wish my monitor could display a 32bit HDR. However, I hate terribly tone-mapped images that claim to be HDR. It seems your site and question reflects my opinion. I'm not sure why you would make a poll and then claim which side it right just below the question. Read up on bias questioning.

I don't claim which side is right. I just gave a description of what it is, and what it's really meant to be used for.

[digirebelva]

Arent the rules of any genre meant to be broken? HDR will evolve as the technique & software improve..and it becomes more excepted as a technique and not a fringe process..

[wannabephotographer]

I didn't know there were rules? I must have broken all of them.

[i speak in math]

Originally Posted by klr

I don't claim which side is right. I just gave a description of what it is, and what it's really meant to be used for.

And therein lies your bias. You describe what you think its really meant for. Other people choose to use it in a different way. Then you berate the forms of use other than what you think it should be. And you have a nice poll to ask which form they like. What do you think people will choose?