#1 (permalink)  
Old 05-01-2010, 03:55 PM
Stina3246's Avatar
dPS Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 292
Default Hi, I'm new with a stupid question

Hello, Let me start off by saying that I've been reading tips from this site now for a few months and LOVE the info and assignments. I've been hesitant to post anything though because in my experience from other sites the ONLY responses you often get are negative and berating with nothing constructive, or heaven forbid, nice! But I've been reading your posts and you seem like a wonderful helpful group of people.

Now for the stupid question.....

I understand that if you want a narrow depth of field you open up you aperture (more light) and if you want a wider depth of field you close it down (less light) Am I correct or am I way off base? My question is...why is that so? It seems backwards to me. I would think that if you let in more light, more things would be illuminated and there for more things in focus and vise versa.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 05-01-2010, 03:59 PM
SusanH1970's Avatar
Am I in trouble again?
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Connecticut, USA
Posts: 9,169
Default

The only stupid questions are the ones not asked. Welcome to DPS!

You are correct - a large aperture (smaller number) will give a shallow depth of field, whereas a small aperture (larger number) will give a deep depth of field, thus having more in focus. Light has nothing to do with focus and depth of field.

Take a look at the Depth of Field Calculator. It puts things into perspective. Also see this thread: Depth of Field comparison Hope this helps!

Yeah, we're a friendly bunch, aside from a few grumps and the occasional snob - but just ignore them, LOL!
__________________
Susan
Mostly Canon stuff
My Flickr
Facebook - new photos always posted and always happy for new "likes"!
Website going through an overhaul!

Last edited by SusanH1970; 05-01-2010 at 04:14 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 05-01-2010, 04:22 PM
Jim Bryant's Avatar
Stoned Cold Crazy
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: WA
Posts: 8,084
Default

AHHHHHHHHH, we're not that bad. I'm only grumpy from time to time.

It you want a shadow DOP you use your smallest f-stop. The larger the number, the more depth of field you'll get. Try this, set some stationary objects (bottles) in a line about a foot a part (do this outside) take a picture of each bottle (one at a time) going from the smallest to largest f-stop. Afterwards, download them on your computer and view the images. It should help you understand f-stops in relationships to depth of field.
__________________
url:www.jimbryantphotography.com
http://pa.photoshelter.com/c/jimbryant
http://jimbryantphotography.blogspot.com/
(3) EOS1D MKIIs', (1) EOS1Ds MKII, 14mmf2.8, 16-35mmf2.8, 28-70mmf2.8, 70-200mm f2.8, 300mm f2.8 and a 400mmf2.8.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 05-01-2010, 05:04 PM
Stina3246's Avatar
dPS Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 292
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim Bryant View Post
AHHHHHHHHH, we're not that bad. I'm only grumpy from time to time.

It you want a shadow DOP you use your smallest f-stop. The larger the number, the more depth of field you'll get. Try this, set some stationary objects (bottles) in a line about a foot a part (do this outside) take a picture of each bottle (one at a time) going from the smallest to largest f-stop. Afterwards, download them on your computer and view the images. It should help you understand f-stops in relationships to depth of field.
Thanks so much!! I like the idea of the bottles....I'm gonna give that a try...who knows, maybe I'll get a cool shot out of it. And see....even the "grumpy" ones give good info!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 05-01-2010, 05:07 PM
SusanH1970's Avatar
Am I in trouble again?
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Connecticut, USA
Posts: 9,169
Default

Eh, Jim's not that much of a grump. He likes to pretend he is, but he's a teddy bear under it all.
__________________
Susan
Mostly Canon stuff
My Flickr
Facebook - new photos always posted and always happy for new "likes"!
Website going through an overhaul!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 05-01-2010, 05:32 PM
candidrachel's Avatar
Photoholic
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Away with the fairies
Posts: 2,404
Default

"Those who are afraid of asking questions are ashamed of learning" - A poster at work.

Jim had a great tip in fact I did the same trick using Russian dolls. For a long time I just couldn't get this aperture thing to register to the grey matter. I kept getting it the wrong way round like large f no = large aperture.

Best advice is to just practice and try to remember what works and what doesn't.

Susan - snobs? Hmmmm I wonder who you are referring to lol!
__________________
http://www.flickr.com/photos/rachelgingell/

"Do not wait, the time will never be just right. Start where you stand and work with whatever tools you may have at your command, and better tools will be found as you go along" - Napoleon Hill
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 05-01-2010, 07:34 PM
Nathan deGargoyle's Avatar
dPS +1000 Club
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Chesterfield, UK
Posts: 2,106
Default

Stina this is a perfect example of the fact that there are no stupid questions, just stupid answers!

Hey Guys, Stina knows that a wide aperture gives a narrow DoF, she wants to know why!

Stina welcome to DPS. I apologise for my friends inability to read a post. Personally, I don't know why a large aperture gives a small DoF but maybe a tutorial from cambridge in colour will help.
__________________
"A wise man speaks because he has something to say, a fool speaks because he has to say something." -aristotle.
Nikon D70s, 18-55 kit lens, 55-200 VR, 28mm f/2.8, 50mm f/1.8
creativecommons.org - Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike
My "Best shots" on Flickr
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 05-01-2010, 08:44 PM
inkista's Avatar
Gear Geek Girl
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 9,154
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stina3246 View Post
My question is...why is that so? It seems backwards to me. I would think that if you let in more light, more things would be illuminated and there for more things in focus and vise versa.
The amount of light actually doesn't have much to do with it being focused. Focusing basically has to do with the angles of the light coming in and the distances they travel, so that they coherently meet at a specific spot. When the aperture is opened up wider, and more light comes in, it comes in at a wider variety of angles, so more of the light is thrown at distances where they don't focus. The narrower the angle of the light coming in, the more of it will gather up at the right distances to focus.

It's an optics thang.

Your eyes work the same way. Remember how your opthamologist tells you not to drive after your pupils have dilated? That's because your DoF got a lot smaller when your irises (aperture) opened up wider.
__________________
I shoot with a Canon 5DmkII, 50D, and S90, and Pansonic G3. flickr stream and equipment list

Last edited by inkista; 05-01-2010 at 08:46 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

What’s Your Preference?

Daily Digest

Each day we send out a quick email to thousands of DPS readers to notify them of updates. This email is just short excerpt of the first few lines of our latest post with a link if you want to read it all. You can unsubscribe from this this service at any time.

This service is provided by a third party (Feedburner) and you can subscribe to it by leaving your email address in the following field and confirming your subscription when you get an email asking you to do so.

Enter your email address for
Daily Updates:

Weekly Summary

For those wanting a weekly summary of what happens on this site this free email newsletter is probably your best option. It includes a summary of the tips posted to the site each week. This newsletter is subscribed to by over 25000 readers (many who also subscribe to the other options above) - come join the community!

To subscribe to this weekly newsletter simply add your email address to the following field and then follow the confirmation prompts. You will be able to unsubscribe at any time.

Enter your email address for
Free Weekly Newsletter:

 
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.0