#1 (permalink)  
Old 02-05-2010, 08:25 PM
Jerel's Avatar
I'm new here!
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Fairbanks, Alaska
Posts: 39
Default What is it about Plus/Full Figured Models?

I've notice that there are only a few Photographers that shoot and post photos of plus/full figured models. I'd like to know if it more of a challenge to work with plus size models? Is it that plus size women don't like to be photographed? I'd really like to hear your opinion.
__________________
Canon Rebel XTI, 18-55mm, 50mm, 55-250mm, Remote and Battery Grip.

Flickr
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 02-05-2010, 08:29 PM
Jim Bryant's Avatar
Stoned Cold Crazy
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: WA
Posts: 8,084
Default

They want to look skinny, unless they are ok with looking fat. A big market out there for those folks in advertising.
__________________
url:www.jimbryantphotography.com
http://pa.photoshelter.com/c/jimbryant
http://jimbryantphotography.blogspot.com/
(3) EOS1D MKIIs', (1) EOS1Ds MKII, 14mmf2.8, 16-35mmf2.8, 28-70mmf2.8, 70-200mm f2.8, 300mm f2.8 and a 400mmf2.8.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 02-05-2010, 08:45 PM
dPS Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 387
Default

Jim's bluntness aside

Its true, taking a " society sized woman" and a flattering picture I am thinking is easier, then a plus sized model. The picture has to look good. There are a lot of plus sized women/men that are quite content with their body, but that does not directly relate to a good picture. Getting that picture to look good requires a certain touch, finesse and experience.

You have to make the model look their BEST in a picture of a plus sized person, there is already to much that society would place on them without a bad picture to boot.

I still think it is still the industry's fault as well as consumers to blame for it. Sex sells, period and still there is to much tied up in a size 1 model vs a size 18 model.
__________________
[Body] Nikon d3100 |
[Glass] Nikon 18-55mmVR | Nikon AF-S 55-200 | Nikon 35mm 1.8 AF-S
[Flash] Nikon SB600 |
[Other] Sears 28mm f2.8 | Nikon 50mm f1.8 E | Tokina 80-200 f/4 |
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 02-05-2010, 08:58 PM
verb noun
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Albany, NY
Posts: 982
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim Bryant View Post
They want to look skinny, unless they are ok with looking fat.
Wow.

No.

This is not only wrong, but disgustingly offensive.

"plus size" does not equal "fat". If you're as well versed in advertising as you claim, you'd know that. "full figured" doesn't even mean "fat" necessarily, but it's often a euphemism.

And it's absolutely not true that they all want to look skinny. There are plenty of women out there who are not a size 4 and under, who love how they look, and who moreover are perfectly healthy and happy individuals.

Score one for the patriarchy, man. Well done.
__________________
Photo This
flickr
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 02-05-2010, 09:04 PM
hibou's Avatar
dPS Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 222
Default

Quote:
Wow.

No.

This is not only wrong, but disgustingly offensive.

"plus size" does not equal "fat". If you're as well versed in advertising as you claim, you'd know that. "full figured" doesn't even mean "fat" necessarily, but it's often a euphemism.
Thank you for that.

This topic is a can of worms.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 02-05-2010, 09:11 PM
dPS Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 387
Default

Plus does not mean fat, you are correct, and I think what Jim was referring to is the fact that a picture can and often does make the model look different. Unless you know exactly what you are doing and how to set up the shot.

SO many plus sized women do not like their picture taken cause to THEM it makes them look fat.

My wife is a prime example of that. She is not a size 2 anymore but also not FAT! Looks great in person but in a picture, (since I dont know how to do it correctly) she feels she looks fat and therefor will not pose for any.

Give Jim a break on that one, watch and read the wording carefully and you will see his point.

As for being a can of worms, YUP and Tough. Life is a can of worms, real life topics are real life topics, not all are rainbows and kittens...
__________________
[Body] Nikon d3100 |
[Glass] Nikon 18-55mmVR | Nikon AF-S 55-200 | Nikon 35mm 1.8 AF-S
[Flash] Nikon SB600 |
[Other] Sears 28mm f2.8 | Nikon 50mm f1.8 E | Tokina 80-200 f/4 |
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 02-05-2010, 09:13 PM
Algernonep's Avatar
Digital Photography Era
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 395
Default

Jim may have been a bit blunt with his statement but it is mostly true. Full figured women are overweight (fat). Full figured women (fat) that are comfortable and confident in there size are beautiful women. "Fat" woman are want to be beautiful. They don't understand that you can be beautiful without being skinny. Skinny is sickly and fat is overweight. The word 'fat' just sounds bad.
__________________
Digital Photography Era
DPEra Forum
My Facebook Page, My Twitter 500px
Nikon D700, Nikon D60, Nikon DX 55-200mm, Nikon DX 18-55mm, Nikon 85mm f/1.8, Nikon 24-70mm f/2.8, Nikon 105mm, SB-600, SB-900
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 02-05-2010, 09:14 PM
Jim Bryant's Avatar
Stoned Cold Crazy
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: WA
Posts: 8,084
Default

you're right....big, tall, plus........must be in sizes over 15 I guess. Still...........most big/plus want to look thin. I have seen some big/plus models who don't care and do look good photographed. Besides......money and money and all accepted in the bank.
__________________
url:www.jimbryantphotography.com
http://pa.photoshelter.com/c/jimbryant
http://jimbryantphotography.blogspot.com/
(3) EOS1D MKIIs', (1) EOS1Ds MKII, 14mmf2.8, 16-35mmf2.8, 28-70mmf2.8, 70-200mm f2.8, 300mm f2.8 and a 400mmf2.8.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 02-05-2010, 09:22 PM
Jim Bryant's Avatar
Stoned Cold Crazy
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: WA
Posts: 8,084
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BCampbell View Post
Wow.

No.

This is not only wrong, but disgustingly offensive.

"plus size" does not equal "fat". If you're as well versed in advertising as you claim, you'd know that. "full figured" doesn't even mean "fat" necessarily, but it's often a euphemism.

And it's absolutely not true that they all want to look skinny. There are plenty of women out there who are not a size 4 and under, who love how they look, and who moreover are perfectly healthy and happy individuals.

Score one for the patriarchy, man. Well done.
What are you doing following me around today. Yes, I'm well versed in advertising, it's those PC wieners ad reps who started full figured/ big or whatever slogan they prefer. It's still up to the photographers to deal with the models attidudes. Most I've met are happy with the way they look, hell......money is money.
__________________
url:www.jimbryantphotography.com
http://pa.photoshelter.com/c/jimbryant
http://jimbryantphotography.blogspot.com/
(3) EOS1D MKIIs', (1) EOS1Ds MKII, 14mmf2.8, 16-35mmf2.8, 28-70mmf2.8, 70-200mm f2.8, 300mm f2.8 and a 400mmf2.8.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 02-05-2010, 09:34 PM
windrider86's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Trinidad, Co
Posts: 16,142
Default

Most folks want to do what will make them the most money. Sadly larger size models are not main stream. Society wants thin, fit and sexy. Of course there's that odl saying "Beauty is in the eye of the beholder" sadly most beholders want thinner models.

Even when i do portraits of larger women, most will ask if I can make them look thinner. So, it is what is it
__________________
Olympus user, Fuji E900, a canon & last but not least a Minolta 35mm and some really old large format box cameras.Not to mention a whole bunch of other stuff. Paint Shop Pro X3, CS3,CS5, Portrait Professional, Topaz Adjust, Lucis Art and the list goes on........
www.alockintime.com



Facebook
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

What’s Your Preference?

Daily Digest

Each day we send out a quick email to thousands of DPS readers to notify them of updates. This email is just short excerpt of the first few lines of our latest post with a link if you want to read it all. You can unsubscribe from this this service at any time.

This service is provided by a third party (Feedburner) and you can subscribe to it by leaving your email address in the following field and confirming your subscription when you get an email asking you to do so.

Enter your email address for
Daily Updates:

Weekly Summary

For those wanting a weekly summary of what happens on this site this free email newsletter is probably your best option. It includes a summary of the tips posted to the site each week. This newsletter is subscribed to by over 25000 readers (many who also subscribe to the other options above) - come join the community!

To subscribe to this weekly newsletter simply add your email address to the following field and then follow the confirmation prompts. You will be able to unsubscribe at any time.

Enter your email address for
Free Weekly Newsletter:

 
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.0