|
||||
|
Quote:
From the Forums
__________________
GREG - Canon XS with 18-55 kit flickr flickriver My 500px "You can't be young forever, but you can always be immature." - Larry Andersen. |
|
|||
|
nice comment.
__________________
Answer of the question What is LNG and the explanation why the LNG market exists. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
This diagram shows the interaction between viewer (that use internet browser such as IE, firefox etc), DPS Web site (server), and Image Source (such as Flickr). Whenever there is interaction, there will be bandwidth usage between the two interactors. This diagram has been simplified for easier understanding. The numbering in the diagram shows the sequence of interaction, from top to down. 1) When we browse DPS website, a web request will be sent by IE/firefox on behalf of you for the web page / URL. 2) If the webpage is up and available, the DPS web server will give response to your IE / firefox. And your IE/Firefox will start download the web page WITHOUT Images. This is that minimum bandwidth has been used in DPS Web site for this interaction. 3-5) Once your IE/FireFox read to the point of img src="http://.... flickr", your browser will request and download the image from Flickr. Here, both the viewer and flickr bandwidth involved. As the image is much bigger than the text (see 2), then the performance of viewing a DPS website depends greatly on viewer's and flickr bandwidth, and very less depending on DPS server bandwidth,. The IE/Firefox will display the image bit by bit when downloading the image, depending on their behavior. However, this is untrue if you attach photos to DPS server. In conclusion, those who upload photos in Flickr or other web server (e.g. nikonclub etc), very little bandwidth of DPS server will be used that will not affect the performance of viewing by other DPS users, SIGNIFICANTLY. However, when DPS users attach images such as what i have done below, DPS bandwidth will be utilized at very very much more extent that will slow down other viewers (as an image is usually a few hundred to few thousands times HEAVIER than a dps web page - to bandwidth taken for 1 viewer to see an image equal to 500~1000 viewer vewing a forum page without images).Think of multiplication effect when multiple users doing the same.. The forum will always accessible by viewers, just they may have timing problem to download images if the images' source are in other server (flickr). This , however, untrue of they upload images to DPS server. I strongly recommended that, whenever possible, upload your images to other websites (e.g. flickr , nikonclub, canonclub) to speed up the DPS web pages viewing..or otherwise, follow the admin advice to limit the size of image attached to this server. Regards Ting.
__________________
Natural vs Available Light for Kid Photography ". http://www.digital-photography-schoo...comment-268773 Wide open Children poseMen pose http://digital-photography-school.co...aphing-couples Last edited by ccting; 10-20-2011 at 01:18 AM. |
|
||||
|
The bandwidth to be considered isn't just from DPS as a provider but also the size of the data pipe to the user. Their browser will be able to cope with drawing data from multiple sources - if anything, it may speed things up as separate streams are downloaded in parallel - but it all has to fit through the capacity of their data connection.
Dial up connections may be less common but people frequently use wireless connections for the last leg of the journey, which can have a dramatic effect on speed (especially if they decide to sit in a awkward corner of their house or at the far end of the garden). Also, while for home use most of us have long ago given up paying much attention to the page size of different sites, it comes back to bite you when you have to pay (at rates that can be ridiculously expensive once you pass the "fair usage" cap). Given that data access on the move also means that smaller screens are back with a vengeance, there are probably more reasons now to impose an image size limit than when it was first set. Of course, the sensible thing to do is to link to a larger version somewhere else so that, if someone wants, they can choose to see your image in all it's glory. Wulf |
|
||||
|
Quote:
http://digital-photography-school.com/forum/faq.php?faq=img#faq_flckr When you "Imbed" a photo it acts as a link directly back to Flickr. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Each day we send out a quick email to thousands of DPS readers to notify them of updates. This email is just short excerpt of the first few lines of our latest post with a link if you want to read it all. You can unsubscribe from this this service at any time.
This service is provided by a third party (Feedburner) and you can subscribe to it by leaving your email address in the following field and confirming your subscription when you get an email asking you to do so.
Enter your email address for
Daily Updates:
For those wanting a weekly summary of what happens on this site this free email newsletter is probably your best option. It includes a summary of the tips posted to the site each week. This newsletter is subscribed to by over 25000 readers (many who also subscribe to the other options above) - come join the community!
To subscribe to this weekly newsletter simply add your email address to the following field and then follow the confirmation prompts. You will be able to unsubscribe at any time.
Enter your email address for
Free Weekly Newsletter: