|
|||
|
Hi,
I appreciate all of the other posts on camera selection, they've been very helpful. I'm finally upgrading from my 35 mm slr and a point and shoot digital to a dslr. My main issue is low light pictures. I take a lot of pictures at kids events - concerts, plays etc - and am looking for a dSLR that i can count on in an auditorium, without a flash, to take low light shots. First off, I'm waffling between Nikon and Canon. My investment in existing lenses is small so that's not much of a consideration. I'm tempted to go the lower end route with either the Nikon D5000/Canon Rebel t1i. From the reviews, the bodies aren't as durable (with kids around, that's always a concern - not that I'm expecting any dSLR to be kid proof) and the ISO levels might not be adequate. I'd hate to pick one of these up and find out halfway through the school year that they're not giving me the quality of picture I'm looking for I was narrowing my choice to the Nikon D90 but with what I've been reading (pre-release) about the Canon EOS 7D, it may be worth waiting for. So, not having experience with these cameras, my question to the community is, for good quality low light pictures, what level of dSLR do I really need to look at? The price tags of the lower end models obviously appeals but I'd rather spend the extra bucks for a camera that I'll be happy with for an extended period of time than have to upgrade quickly. Thanks for your help Tom |
|
||||
|
I can vouch for the Canon 50D shooting very well in low light, even with a kit lens. Can only imagine with a better lens what it could do.
__________________
Canon 50D: Sigma 10-20mm f/4-5.6 EX DC HSM , Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS, Photoshop CS5 |
|
|||
|
Quote:
and low noise high ISO performance: Nikon D3* (ISO 6400). Very expensive and heavy. Good for almost everything. Otherwise, wait for Canon 1D4 series.Low noise high ISO performance: Nikon D700 (ISO 6400). Expensive. Good for low light fast actions. Nikon D300*/D300s/D90/D5000 (ISO 1600-3200). Affordable. D300/D300s Auto Focus is better for fast actions. Canon 7D (ISO 1600, 3200 ?). Good for fast actions. "At ISO 3200 and beyond you'll run into increasingly unmanageable amounts of digital dandruff (white pixels spread throughout darker areas) and plugged shadows." Rob Galbraith. ISO 3200 sample: http://www.robgalbraith.com/public_f...00_Profile.jpg Canon 5D Mk II* (ISO 3200). Not that great for fast actions (kids!!!). * My gears. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Each day we send out a quick email to thousands of DPS readers to notify them of updates. This email is just short excerpt of the first few lines of our latest post with a link if you want to read it all. You can unsubscribe from this this service at any time.
This service is provided by a third party (Feedburner) and you can subscribe to it by leaving your email address in the following field and confirming your subscription when you get an email asking you to do so.
Enter your email address for
Daily Updates:
For those wanting a weekly summary of what happens on this site this free email newsletter is probably your best option. It includes a summary of the tips posted to the site each week. This newsletter is subscribed to by over 25000 readers (many who also subscribe to the other options above) - come join the community!
To subscribe to this weekly newsletter simply add your email address to the following field and then follow the confirmation prompts. You will be able to unsubscribe at any time.
Enter your email address for
Free Weekly Newsletter: