#21 (permalink)  
Old 12-27-2009, 06:23 PM
oldwolf's Avatar
Full of useless info.
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,920
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sarahgirl777 View Post
Yes, a fast lens is nice, but I don't think that alone will get you to where these photos are at. I think a lot of it is lighting and focus. Perfect focus on the eyes, well lit with great light and then yes some PP to bring out the eyes and smooth the skin. I can achieve that look even without using my prime lens so it's definately more than that. Do you have another example of your work we can see that doesn't have a texture over it. That automatically makes it look less "crisp" to me. Oh and you said you were using 1/30 shutter speed which could allow some camera or person movement keeping the photo from being as crisp too. Hope this helps.
Sarah got it on the nose for that shutter speed. your exif states that your focal length was 105mm. At 1/30 shutter speed, that is way too slow to hand hold IMO. You should try to keep your shutter speed at 1/focal length. So at 105mm focal length, I personally wouldn't shoot faster than 1/125 and that's if i haven't had any caffeine and I'm not shaking from freezing my butt off hehe.

The lens is going to play some part in your picture as well as the lighting. Remember, you're taking a picture of the light. Look at your subject and see where the light and shadows fall. Do the shadows give accent the subject the way you want them to? If not then have them move or add a reflector or some type of light modifier.

Last but not least, learn all you can about post processing. It's not cheating. It's the equivalent of the darkroom of the old days where they had to dodge and burn manually. You just don't have any of the developer or fixer getting you high.
__________________
-When confronted by a difficult problem, you can solve it more easily by reducing it to the question, "How would the Lone Ranger handle this?"
-I'm a vessel of useless information; just ask my wife.

-Critiques and editing of my pics for DPS always welcome-
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 01-02-2010, 04:41 PM
dPS Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 140
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nathanbarlow View Post
cant help with your request, but would like to say that the 'tweak' someone did above, looks worse IMO. The dark background is good. and the yellowish tinge is better than the blueish tinge the PP gave. Having said that the yellow isnt great, just better than blue.
Agreed. I like the original better.
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 01-02-2010, 09:02 PM
elkidogz's Avatar
dPS Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 240
Default

I use adobe lightroom to work on the pictures brightness and tones. I think that it's a few adjustments in the tones section and the lighting settings that you are wanting to try. possibly use a difused light source. which will produce a softer lighting.
__________________
Thanks,

Elkidogz
Nikon D80, D60, 775
Review my photos at: Flickr
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 01-11-2010, 04:23 PM
I'm new here!
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Closer to New York than LA
Posts: 40
Default great converstion -- what about iso?

I noticed when I opened the original example adobe bridge that the iso is 2000. Just curious why it was taken at such a high iso. I am in a place where I try to do as little post processing as possible and to get smooth skin I conciously shoot at a much lower iso. In general, I liked your shot very much.
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 01-13-2010, 12:42 AM
natek313's Avatar
dPS Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 838
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cphoniball View Post
What's probably the most important is the lens you're using. Most portrait photographers will use a fast prime in the 50-100mm range (I don't know about Nikon, but Canon makes a mean 85mm 1.8 that is great for portraits).
Nikon does make an 85mm f/1.8 lens that is supposed to be quite good as well. One of my friends that shoots Nikon was oogling over my Canon 85mm f/1.8 while wishing he had one for his D200. Haha.
__________________
Flickr
Model Mayhem - I'd love to work with you!
Twitter - Follow me!
facebook - Become my fan!
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 02-06-2010, 12:36 AM
Raoul Isidro's Avatar
Fuggetaboutit!
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Woolloomoolloo Kirribilli Peninsula
Posts: 771
Default

It's not what you are doing wrong.
It's what they are overdoing... ummm to make it "right".
YouTube - Model Evolution With Makeup And Photoshop

__________________
"The greatest camera in the world is the one you hold in your hands when sh*t happens." Raoul Isidro
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 02-09-2010, 08:01 PM
LeeR's Avatar
Professional Wanderer
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Gainesville, Florida
Posts: 1,611
Default

Call me a contrarian, but I am going to disagree with just about everyone who has gone before me: your lighting is too flat. The reason you like the photographer whose link you posted is because she has developed an eye for good portrait lighting. This does not come easy, but once you learn to see it your images will improve dramatically.
It is hard to put into writing the kind of light that works best but I have an idea that may help. Many area malls have an "atrium" area. This is an area with a large open skylight and high walls that produce a wonderful light. Once you see the light I am talking about, and get some great images, you should be able to find that light in other places as well.
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old 02-15-2010, 08:58 PM
I'm new here!
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 2
Default Hi

First of all you are not doing anything wrong. The photos on that site are touched up.
Your portrait of the girl is absolutely beautiful. But most photographers use some kind of software to slightly re-touch and eliminate the little imperfections that you see on everyone's faces.
You just need to find the correct software and you too will be able to do this.
The great thing about software of this kind is that you can add as little of an effect or as much as you like.
I sometimes use Topaz Labs for some of my photos. It is especially nice for portraits of my grandson, who already is beautiful but I just smooth out his skin tones a little.

Kate

Also the portraits on the site were probably either done in soft-over cast light, but most portraits need a little help
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
clarity, exposure, portraits, skin, tone

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

What’s Your Preference?

Daily Digest

Each day we send out a quick email to thousands of DPS readers to notify them of updates. This email is just short excerpt of the first few lines of our latest post with a link if you want to read it all. You can unsubscribe from this this service at any time.

This service is provided by a third party (Feedburner) and you can subscribe to it by leaving your email address in the following field and confirming your subscription when you get an email asking you to do so.

Enter your email address for
Daily Updates:

Weekly Summary

For those wanting a weekly summary of what happens on this site this free email newsletter is probably your best option. It includes a summary of the tips posted to the site each week. This newsletter is subscribed to by over 25000 readers (many who also subscribe to the other options above) - come join the community!

To subscribe to this weekly newsletter simply add your email address to the following field and then follow the confirmation prompts. You will be able to unsubscribe at any time.

Enter your email address for
Free Weekly Newsletter:

 
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.0