#1 (permalink)  
Old 08-30-2009, 09:38 PM
I'm new here!
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 14
Default Polarize lens and overexposure

Alright so I was at the zoo yesterday and I was taking some photos and I decided that since it was a nice sunny day I would give a go with my CP lens. Now I did gets some great shots, but there were quite a few that had some beautiful areas with overexposure in areas, can I get some hints and tips on how to correct this for next time. Keep in mind that I was using the camera on Full Auto. What are some things I can do to get better exposure? As you can see from the photo the items in the shade cameout pretty good, but the ones not in the shade were overexposed.

Thanks for any help you can provide.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Zoo and Fort Jackson 108.jpg (81.4 KB, 93 views)
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 08-30-2009, 10:28 PM
dcclark's Avatar
Moderates the loving team
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Houghton, MI
Posts: 2,359
Default

Was there any particular reason why you were using your polarizer? From your sample, it doesn't look like it would do much, except absorb light (which is unnecessary, if you're not trying to get slow shutter speeds). Polarizers primarily remove reflections from not-metallic things (such as glass and water), and make skies bluer.

As for overexposure, this is a hazard of taking shots of shadowy subjects on bright days. Your eyes can see things like the shadows and hilights of the tortises just fine, but your camera is much more sensitive to bright vs. dark areas. This has nothing to do with the polarizer, more, it's just how every camera works. Ways to avoid it are -- recompose to include more shadowy (or more bright) areas, or wait for the light to change.
__________________
David Clark Photography, project 365 photo blog, flickr.
It is OK to edit and repost my photos on the DPS forums only.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 08-30-2009, 10:39 PM
I'm new here!
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 14
Default

Guess I am using for the wrong reasons then, but the shots I have with sky turned out great. One of the places I used it was a Koi pond and came out with almost the same reaction. Thanks for the info.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 09-18-2009, 10:28 PM
dPS Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Emigrant, MT
Posts: 56
Default

It looks to me like the problems aren't with the CP filter (Although as dcclark pointed out, it wasn't really necessary for the sample you posted). I would work on learning how your camera's light meter works, and how to properly expose an image. If you've got $17 to spend (Or your local library might have it) Understanding Exposure by Bryan Peterson is an excellent book that would probably help you out quite a bit.

If you can't/don't want to get that book, check your camera's manual and read about the different metering modes that it supports.
__________________
Shooting with a D80
18-55mm kit lens | 50mm 1.8 | 50-200mm | 70-300mm | 105mm Macro 2.8 | SB-800
My flickr
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 09-18-2009, 11:05 PM
dPS Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: UK. North-West
Posts: 540
Default

In the photo in your example, you would have to choose wether to expose the shadows or the bright areas, because it looks like a bright day then you wouldn't be able to get both at once.

The best choice would have been to lose some detail in the shadows so that the bright areas came out looking better.
__________________
Nikon D40, Nikon 18-55, Nikon 50mm 1.8, Sigma 70 - 210.

Feel free to visit my flickr
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 09-19-2009, 01:21 AM
Elmo's Avatar
Almost as Old as Dirt
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: North Carolina USA
Posts: 1,055
Default

CPL have more uses than darkening sky's. If properly used they restict light entering the camera to that which is in one plane. That reduces the scattered reflected light from other objects intensifying the colors by reducing the scattered light which is usually recorded as a slight grayish haze.

As for the over exposure it is the result of faulty metering technique and selection of area photographed.

As a side note this photograph exceeds the dynamic range of the camera (Blown out highlights) and if complete area is needed it might be a canadate for HDR (High Dynamic Range) processing.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

What’s Your Preference?

Daily Digest

Each day we send out a quick email to thousands of DPS readers to notify them of updates. This email is just short excerpt of the first few lines of our latest post with a link if you want to read it all. You can unsubscribe from this this service at any time.

This service is provided by a third party (Feedburner) and you can subscribe to it by leaving your email address in the following field and confirming your subscription when you get an email asking you to do so.

Enter your email address for
Daily Updates:

Weekly Summary

For those wanting a weekly summary of what happens on this site this free email newsletter is probably your best option. It includes a summary of the tips posted to the site each week. This newsletter is subscribed to by over 25000 readers (many who also subscribe to the other options above) - come join the community!

To subscribe to this weekly newsletter simply add your email address to the following field and then follow the confirmation prompts. You will be able to unsubscribe at any time.

Enter your email address for
Free Weekly Newsletter:

 
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.0