#1 (permalink)  
Old 06-24-2009, 08:29 AM
souledout's Avatar
New Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: In a very hot/dry area of Southern California.
Posts: 27
Default Breaking the rule of thirds

Okay, so I need another opinion (or opinions) on whether breaking the rule of thirds works in this case. I like how the photo came out, but does it look strange with the edge of the building centered? Should I crop it?

Getty Buildings I

Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 06-24-2009, 09:24 AM
wulf's Avatar
Ninja Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 9,667
Default

The rule of thirds isn't a fixed, do-it-or-we'll-break-your-fingers deal; it is just an option that works well in many cases. Have you played with some options? Eg.

Vertical(ish) line about 1/3 of the way from the left (lots of sky)

Ditto but 1/3 of the way from the right (building dominates)

Vertex of triangle where wall and roof join on top left intersection of a thirds grid

If you aren't sure what will work for a picture, mock up some options then sit back and compare them.

Wulf
__________________
Wulf Forrester-Barker << Sites: blog / flickr >>
Gear: Nikon D40, Nikon AFS 18-55mm f/3.5 - 5.6G, Nikon Series E 50mm f/1.8, Nikon AF 70-300mm f/4-5.6G, Vivitar 90mm f/2.5 macro, Raynox DCR-250, Lensbaby 2.0k, SB600
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 06-24-2009, 03:28 PM
Loves the moderation team!
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Western NY
Posts: 142
Default

I think it looks nice. The color is great. Do you like it? Thats all that really matters. The edge of the building is not center of photo to my eyes. I do not follow this rule. If its right or wrong does not matter to me. I go with what i feel is right for the shot. Besides, i do not follow directions well! lol.
__________________
Canon 7D
Digital Ink Arts
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 07-15-2009, 05:27 PM
Loves the moderation team!
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Cupertino, CA
Posts: 132
Default

I think this picture could work as it is, but I also the rule of thirds might present a better picture (just by imagining things)... one thing that does bug me a little bit is that the right side of the building is not straight (vertically)... then i was looking for other lines that do match up, but the bottom is not horizontally matched nor is the left side vertically straight. I think matching up the right side of the building would be good. its a great shot! the sky is such a beautiful colour!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 07-15-2009, 05:28 PM
Loves the moderation team!
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Cupertino, CA
Posts: 132
Default

I feel like i'm not sure whats the main focus of the picture... the building? or the beautiful sky? which is why rule of 3rds kind of helps with that.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 07-19-2009, 09:32 PM
New Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 8
Default

the rule of 3rds is just a guideline - okay to break it if you get a better pic. I agree that there's too much sky on the right.
__________________
James Kernicky
www.jfk-photo.com
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 07-22-2009, 07:18 AM
denja's Avatar
Loves the moderation team!
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 222
Default

I like the image as is, but I also agree with Wulf about trying different approaches. The only one that even comes close to pleasing me is this one. I changed the perspective so that lines are vertical and cropped out some sky, leaving the right vertical on the 1/3 line. I still think I like the original better. Let me know what you think.
bldgpp
__________________
Kodak Z1012, Pentax PZ10, PZ1, Bronica ETRS, Mamiya C330
Pentax FA 28-80, FA 100-300, FA 1.4 80, AF 330 FTZ
Bronica 75, 150, AE-II Finder, 120 Back, 220 Back
Mamiya 55, 80, 180
Vivitar 2000, 283, 550 FD/Weston Master II,Wein Flash Meter
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 07-22-2009, 07:36 AM
flavio's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Mazkeret Batia, Israel
Posts: 903
Default

Basically I like the picture, the lines, the sky and the composition.
Perhaps a few adjustments might help to improve it a bit more, along the lines of denja's response.
I would use a perspective tool to adjust the horizontal and verival lines.
I would get rid of the upper part of the building, which is breaking the flow.
I did some quick fix using the GIMP to better explain myself.
Here it goes:
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 3521381070_6352c490c6.jpg (94.2 KB, 37 views)
__________________
Canon PowerShot SX100 IS

http://www.flickr.com/photos/37873897@N06/

To avoid situations in which you might make mistakes may be the biggest mistake of all.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 07-22-2009, 07:57 AM
denja's Avatar
Loves the moderation team!
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 222
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by flavio View Post
Basically I like the picture, the lines, the sky and the composition.
Perhaps a few adjustments might help to improve it a bit more, along the lines of denja's response.
I would use a perspective tool to adjust the horizontal and verival lines.
I would get rid of the upper part of the building, which is breaking the flow.
I did some quick fix using the GIMP to better explain myself.
Here it goes:
Flavio - I like the approach of looseing the the top of the building!
__________________
Kodak Z1012, Pentax PZ10, PZ1, Bronica ETRS, Mamiya C330
Pentax FA 28-80, FA 100-300, FA 1.4 80, AF 330 FTZ
Bronica 75, 150, AE-II Finder, 120 Back, 220 Back
Mamiya 55, 80, 180
Vivitar 2000, 283, 550 FD/Weston Master II,Wein Flash Meter
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 07-25-2009, 04:53 PM
New Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 5
Default

a good thing to consider when photographing whatever that has many lines, is to not parallel them with the horizon. try and shoot it so that the lines of the construction point towards the photo, so they drive the eye in the photo and not to the far right. photos with lines drive the eye through the lines first, and then the eye wanders to the rest of the environment. the main subject would be the building not the sky. the observer would follow the lines to the "inside" or depth of the image giving it more of a 3-d approach, and leading him to enjoy the beautiful sky afterwards. of course thats only my opinion. cheers!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
architecture, building, california, museum, sky

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

What’s Your Preference?

Daily Digest

Each day we send out a quick email to thousands of DPS readers to notify them of updates. This email is just short excerpt of the first few lines of our latest post with a link if you want to read it all. You can unsubscribe from this this service at any time.

This service is provided by a third party (Feedburner) and you can subscribe to it by leaving your email address in the following field and confirming your subscription when you get an email asking you to do so.

Enter your email address for
Daily Updates:

Weekly Summary

For those wanting a weekly summary of what happens on this site this free email newsletter is probably your best option. It includes a summary of the tips posted to the site each week. This newsletter is subscribed to by over 25000 readers (many who also subscribe to the other options above) - come join the community!

To subscribe to this weekly newsletter simply add your email address to the following field and then follow the confirmation prompts. You will be able to unsubscribe at any time.

Enter your email address for
Free Weekly Newsletter:

 
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.0