#1 (permalink)  
Old 09-29-2008, 11:24 PM
Clockdoc I's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Pittsgrove, NJ
Posts: 247
Default Rule of thirds for panoramic

I was wondering if the rule of thirds should be followed in a panoramic crop, I wanted to show the water as much as the sky in this shot so I cropped it down the middle. Does it work I guess if I had to I would show more of the sky.

Bar Harbor
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 09-30-2008, 04:22 AM
OsmosisStudios's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Ottawa, Ontario.
Posts: 4,017
Default

I think you could have used a bit less water, in this case. The rule of thirds generally applies: just place the horizon at the bottom 1/3 mark.
__________________
www.os-am.com
Gear List
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 09-30-2008, 01:13 PM
fletch's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sheffield, England
Posts: 1,876
Default

I think the rule of thirds may be even more relevant on the horizontal plane for panoramic shots. With such a defined line dividing top and bottom it splits the photo into two very thin strips.

I'm no expert but I think one key to a good pano is to get the eye to scan from left to right through the shot rather than up and down.
__________________
Fletch

<< blog >> - flickr
Olympus E510 - Ok to edit and re-post on DPS only
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 10-01-2008, 12:53 AM
Clockdoc I's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Pittsgrove, NJ
Posts: 247
Default Recropped

Thanks for your help here it is with less water
Bar Harbor II
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 10-01-2008, 01:50 AM
jdepould's Avatar
Critique Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Syracuse, NY
Posts: 3,856
Send a message via AIM to jdepould
Default

Works better with more sky. The water isn't interesting enough in this particular image to put the horizon at the top third.
__________________
JamieDePould.com, Flickr
Nikon D300, D700
Nikkor 24-70mm f/2.8G, 45mm f/2.8 Ai-P, 50mm f/1.8D, 80-200 f/2.8D, SB-600

Please read the rules before posting a critique thread. Rules here.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 10-01-2008, 03:21 PM
oakwoodlott's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: caerphilly
Posts: 724
Default

Definitely think the 2nd shot is better
__________________
Nikon D90 , Nikon D50,Sigma70-300mm F4-5.6 APO DG Macro, Ricoh Caplio R5

http://oakwoodlott2.blogspot.com/

http://www.flickr.com/photos/41549557@N00/
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 10-07-2008, 10:54 AM
TheJbot's Avatar
Point & Shoot
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 5
Default

Wow, yeah the 2nd one is much better. Nice shot.

My first post
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 10-07-2008, 11:26 AM
wulf's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 7,885
Default

I see that I'm swimming against the flow on this one: I prefer the original version, with two even blocks of sea and sky. The dividing point could perhaps be a little lower, as the hills intrude onto the sky which makes the darker portion of the image take up more than half the space but I think the result is more striking than 2/3 | 1/3.

In other words, if it were my image, I would be drawn to playing with treating the image as two vertically hinged panels instead of thinking so much about the rule of thirds.

Wulf
__________________
Wulf Forrester-Barker << Sites: blog / flickr >>
Gear: Nikon D40, Nikon AFS 18-55mm f/3.5 - 5.6G, Nikon Series E 50mm f/1.8, Nikon AF 70-300mm f/4-5.6G, Vivitar 90mm f/2.5 macro, Raynox DCR-250, Lensbaby 2.0k, SB600
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 10-07-2008, 01:00 PM
TammyB74's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 104
Default

I think it really depends on what your focus is. I think the edit on the second picture brings your eye to the sky, however in your first picture my eyes are looking all over your image. So with that said, if it were my image, I would probably have cropped it like Wulf noted, as both parts of the picture are equally pleasing to me.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 10-07-2008, 06:41 PM
Palladius's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: London, England
Posts: 242
Default

I was thinking exactly the same as Wulf, although I definitely couldn't have articulated it that well!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

What’s Your Preference?

Daily Digest

Each day we send out a quick email to thousands of DPS readers to notify them of updates. This email is just short excerpt of the first few lines of our latest post with a link if you want to read it all. You can unsubscribe from this this service at any time.

This service is provided by a third party (Feedburner) and you can subscribe to it by leaving your email address in the following field and confirming your subscription when you get an email asking you to do so.

Enter your email address for
Daily Updates:

Weekly Summary

For those wanting a weekly summary of what happens on this site this free email newsletter is probably your best option. It includes a summary of the tips posted to the site each week. This newsletter is subscribed to by over 25000 readers (many who also subscribe to the other options above) - come join the community!

To subscribe to this weekly newsletter simply add your email address to the following field and then follow the confirmation prompts. You will be able to unsubscribe at any time.

Enter your email address for
Free Weekly Newsletter:

 
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.0