#1 (permalink)  
Old 05-09-2008, 05:39 PM
sk66's Avatar
Lovable Contrarian
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Harrisburg, PA
Posts: 6,764
Question What can be done about mixed lighting?

I'm talking about situations where you have no control over the light sources. Like tungsten lighting mixing with flourescent etc.

I recently tried to take some night pictures of a very old train station which had many overhead tungsten lights, but then every once in a while one of the lights had a flourescent bulb in it, and in some situations there was halide lighting spilling into the scene. I did not want to flood the area with supplimental lighting...it would remove the "night atmosphere", why bother.

All I could come up with was to WB for the predominate lighting (tungsten) but this resulted in patches of bluer/white light from the flourescent and green areas from the halides (I'm not absolutely positive what the "other" light types were, just that they would not balance with the rest). I tried to find an "average WB" to no avail....

Is there any solution to this other than extensive PP?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 05-09-2008, 05:51 PM
dPS +1000 Club
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Cozumel, Quintana Roo
Posts: 3,109
Default

take a bb gun and shoot out the lights.. no really you have to do a lot of pp work... with two different light sources you might be able to average the WB but with three very different sources you are left with PP work.
__________________
Rex K

The view from my "office" doesn't suck.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 05-09-2008, 05:51 PM
jdepould's Avatar
Critique Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 5,492
Default

I wouldn't worry too much about it, since that's how it actually looked. I'd compensate for the predominant lighting and let the other stuff fall as it may.
__________________
JamieDePould.com + OneYearPhoto.com
Nikon D300, D700, Sony NEX5n
Zeiss 2/25; 1.4/50; 1.4/85

Please read the rules before posting a critique thread. Rules here.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 05-09-2008, 06:02 PM
sk66's Avatar
Lovable Contrarian
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Harrisburg, PA
Posts: 6,764
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jdepould View Post
I wouldn't worry too much about it, since that's how it actually looked. I'd compensate for the predominant lighting and let the other stuff fall as it may.
It didn't look like that to me...
The eye, at least mine, seems to be quite adept at applying differential WB...I never "see" a green/blue/orange cast due to lighting...It apparently only exists in captured images...
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 05-09-2008, 06:12 PM
jdepould's Avatar
Critique Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 5,492
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sk66 View Post
It didn't look like that to me...
The eye, at least mine, seems to be quite adept at applying differential WB...I never "see" a green/blue/orange cast due to lighting...It apparently only exists in captured images...
Some of it is recalibrating your eyes. You become more sensitive to changes in color temperature with experience.
__________________
JamieDePould.com + OneYearPhoto.com
Nikon D300, D700, Sony NEX5n
Zeiss 2/25; 1.4/50; 1.4/85

Please read the rules before posting a critique thread. Rules here.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 05-10-2008, 12:47 PM
dPS Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 551
Default

The easiest and most effective solution is to convert to B/W...
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 05-10-2008, 01:37 PM
wanelad's Avatar
dPS Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Brisbane - Australia
Posts: 232
Default

Why not show the pictures so then a judgement can be made from what is seen also would present more as an educational tool
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 05-10-2008, 02:10 PM
dPS +1000 Club
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,904
Default

In mixed lighting like that you pretty much have to pick your predominate light source and then let the others do whatever they do. You can gel your flashes for the predominate light, which should take care of a lot of problems. Another trick I've read in Joe McNalley's book is that he would gel his flash for fluorescent and then put a magenta gel over his lens to bring the flesh tones back to where he wanted them.
__________________
Craig
My zenfolio gallery
My Photoblog
Gear: Nikon D300s, D80 and a lot of stuff for them.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

What’s Your Preference?

Daily Digest

Each day we send out a quick email to thousands of DPS readers to notify them of updates. This email is just short excerpt of the first few lines of our latest post with a link if you want to read it all. You can unsubscribe from this this service at any time.

This service is provided by a third party (Feedburner) and you can subscribe to it by leaving your email address in the following field and confirming your subscription when you get an email asking you to do so.

Enter your email address for
Daily Updates:

Weekly Summary

For those wanting a weekly summary of what happens on this site this free email newsletter is probably your best option. It includes a summary of the tips posted to the site each week. This newsletter is subscribed to by over 25000 readers (many who also subscribe to the other options above) - come join the community!

To subscribe to this weekly newsletter simply add your email address to the following field and then follow the confirmation prompts. You will be able to unsubscribe at any time.

Enter your email address for
Free Weekly Newsletter:

 
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.0