Wedding Kiss

[ocnsprt]

Originally Posted by daddyoproductions

All three are great! I would have a terrible time deciding if they were my photos...however, the texture does give it something different

Thanks, and thank you everyone who looked through. It is interesting how our favorite pictures as photographers are not the pictures our clients chose, the client jsut sent in their order and I dislike all o fthe shots they chose and loved, wierd isnt it (:

anyways thanks again

[kencaleno]

Sorry, but shadows-especially across the faces, is a wedding photography "No-No" Ken

[ocnsprt]

Originally Posted by kencaleno

Sorry, but shadows-especially across the faces, is a wedding photography "No-No" Ken

Unfortunatly this was an "in the moment" shot of them coming out the doors for the first time as husband and wife and I wanted it to be natural and this means, since I cant move the sun, there were shadows. In the other shots of them that I posed there arent bad shadows.

[kencaleno]

Originally Posted by ocnsprt

Unfortunatly this was an "in the moment" shot of them coming out the doors for the first time as husband and wife and I wanted it to be natural and this means, since I cant move the sun, there were shadows. In the other shots of them that I posed there arent bad shadows.

Fill flash would have killed the facial shadows- It's wise to always use flash for outdoor images of people-Not the pop-up flash,but a hot-shoe flash. What you do is get a reading from faces (ambient)
via AV mode,switch to manual mode,and transfer the reading you got, Set flash for auto operation, switch flash on.Take shot. That's the way red carpet photogs in Hollywood do it. Ken