#11 (permalink)  
Old 12-06-2007, 10:23 AM
dPS Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
Posts: 604
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aetnajojo View Post
Some cameras provide a setting for flourescent light.
Yes, but unfortunately these settings tend not to handle the situation where you've got an even amount of daylight and fluorescent light. If the inside light was much stronger than the daylight then that would work, but the problem with this situation is balancing light of two different temperatures.

As a previous poster suggested, if you can take the flash off-camera and over-power the other light sources, you won't have that problem. Even on-camera flash and a diffuser might have done the trick too for a more simplistic solution.
__________________
blog | flickr | Canon 5DII, 7D
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 12-06-2007, 01:43 PM
NaturesPixel's Avatar
Super User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Aussie In Ontario
Posts: 1,437
Default

ok no matter what Camera you use... either on board flash or a hotshoe flash will work wonders, we just did this at my local photo club meet,
Nearly all newer P&S (in the last yr or 2) will allow you to use Fill Flash, and adjust the flash output so do a test shot with fill flash on normal, if the person is filled with harsh light stop the flash out put down try - 2 for eg: this will also allow you to use a F2.8, f3.5 aperture making for a more desirable background (blurred) hope this helps for next time
__________________
Cheers
Leisa

Nikon D80 | Sigma 50-500mm EX DG HSM | Sigma APO 70-300 | Sigma 50mm macro | Nikon 50mm 1.8 | Nikkor 18-70mm | Lensbaby 2.0 | SB-800 Speedlight | Black Macbook C2D
Little pixels from my world . Flickr
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 12-06-2007, 02:06 PM
FocalFrenzy's Avatar
dPS +1000 Club
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Circleville, Ohio
Posts: 1,346
Default

Hi everyone,
My camera is a Sony DSC-H1. The flash is not adjustable beyond on and off. The lady in the picture was sitting in her dining room. to get this shot, I had to stand in the livingroom. Had I been in the room with her, there would have been an even bigger window (4feet by 8feet) behind her. Only the position I shot from, allowed for the least amount of editing.
I apologize for the lack of EXIF data. I thought when you uploaded from Flickr, the info linked to the shot. If not, could someone tell me how to include it in my shots?
I really appreciate all of the advice and the time and effort everyone has put in to fixing this shot. I still haven't figured out how to use GIMP, so I'm still using Picasa and Photo Explosion. That's why I would rather learn how to take the shot "Right" in camera, than just try to fix it later, but I'm still kinda new at this. I'm sure that I'll have lots of shots that can only be salvaged by Post-processing. Thank you all, again for your help.
__________________
"Sic gorgiamus allos subjectatos nunc"..."We gladly feast on those who would subdue us". Not just pretty words." - Morticia Addams
My Gear: Canon EOS Digital Rebel XSi, Canon 50mm F1.8 II EF lens, Canon 28-90mm F4-5.6 III EF lens, Promaster 70-300 5.6 tele/macro lens, Canon Speedlite 430 EX II, Canon Remote switch, GIMP, and Photoshop CS4.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 12-06-2007, 02:51 PM
dPS +1000 Club
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,904
Default

Even Ansel Adams played with shots in post processing (i.e. in the darkroom). So, don't sweat it. Learning digital post processing can actually help your photography as it helps you understand what you did wrong in the camera so you can do better the next time.

Taking the shot is only half of the process. Development, be it chemical baths or digital processing, is as equally important part as pressing the shutter button. In the end, the entire process is a learning tool.

(edit: Just noticed that this was my Nifty Fifty post! Yeah, me! ;-) )
__________________
Craig
My zenfolio gallery
My Photoblog
Gear: Nikon D300s, D80 and a lot of stuff for them.

Last edited by Taallyn; 12-06-2007 at 02:57 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 12-06-2007, 03:01 PM
wulf's Avatar
Ninja Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 9,832
Default

The EXIF data is easy enough to pick up by visiting the picture on Flickr. It can be worth posting a few salient points with the picture though. I have a Firefox script that reveals key details like camera, aperture and shutter speed as soon as I glimpse at a photo page on Flickr so, for me, it is one click away, but for many people it is two clicks and maybe not so obvious in the first place.

Wulf
__________________
Wulf Forrester-Barker << Sites: blog / flickr >>
Gear: Nikon D40, Nikon AFS 18-55mm f/3.5 - 5.6G, Nikon Series E 50mm f/1.8, Nikon AF 70-300mm f/4-5.6G, Vivitar 90mm f/2.5 macro, Raynox DCR-250, Lensbaby 2.0k, SB600
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 12-08-2007, 01:00 AM
hpebley3's Avatar
dPS Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Riverton, UT, USA
Posts: 205
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FocalFrenzy View Post
I took this shot with the available lighting because the woman in the photo is disabled and could not reposition herself into more favorable light. She is sitting under 3 of those cork-screw fluorescent lights, with a window over her right shoulder. The lights make the skin tones too red, and the window makes the skin tones too blue (pale and unnatural). The following shot (edited), was acceptable to her, as the kitten was the subject she wanted focus on anyway. If anyone knows how I could have gotten a better shot (without editing), please let me know.
When you've got mixed light, one of the easiest ways to deal with the different color temperatures is to get rid of one of the light sources. In this case, drawing the blinds might have made things easier.

Cheers.
__________________
Harley Pebley
Sites: Hooked On Light / flickr / Zooomr / iStockPhoto
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 12-12-2007, 06:50 AM
I'm new here!
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Port Orange, FL USA
Posts: 1
Default

From what I have read, you would close off the outside light source and shoot with a flash. This would give you the best white balance for the picture and the AWB wouldn't adjust for the higher kelvin of the outside light source.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

What’s Your Preference?

Daily Digest

Each day we send out a quick email to thousands of DPS readers to notify them of updates. This email is just short excerpt of the first few lines of our latest post with a link if you want to read it all. You can unsubscribe from this this service at any time.

This service is provided by a third party (Feedburner) and you can subscribe to it by leaving your email address in the following field and confirming your subscription when you get an email asking you to do so.

Enter your email address for
Daily Updates:

Weekly Summary

For those wanting a weekly summary of what happens on this site this free email newsletter is probably your best option. It includes a summary of the tips posted to the site each week. This newsletter is subscribed to by over 25000 readers (many who also subscribe to the other options above) - come join the community!

To subscribe to this weekly newsletter simply add your email address to the following field and then follow the confirmation prompts. You will be able to unsubscribe at any time.

Enter your email address for
Free Weekly Newsletter:

 
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.0