|
|||
|
Aww peeper we're not that bad. It is all for the sake of becoming better photographers. Like my mom always tells me "If we didnt care about you we would not critique you" usually she tells me this when she is nagging at me about something.....
__________________
Rex K The view from my "office" doesn't suck.
|
|
||||
|
oh shoot, rex....it was just a figure of speech.....
it's just that i truly want all the feedback i can get....her friends were with her helping us both....and i got petitioned for a few more portraits.....i want to be the best that i can be so that i won't fret too much asking a fair price.... what you and others give me here are the tools to do more....better....and for that i can't thank you enough..... thank you....really....thank you.... peeper |
|
||||
|
peeperita,
To the list, add "more Sun" and "different background" under "Things that might help." It appears most of the light was over your left shoulder or nearly even with your position. Just a tiny bit seems to filter through (below horse's right ear), and colors and lighting might have been given more dimension with some more Sun. Early or late will nearly eliminate the "blow-out" factor). The background is not adding enough to be that obvious. Most of all, I would suggest horses and people both look better seen in 3/4 or profile, not fully frontal. Having model standing in front of and looking towards horse, while horse is turned facing into frame, would be a double portrait with just the front legs of horse. And perhaps backlit, giving a suggestion of the "Lady Godiva" theme through a sheer costume? Hmmmm . . .
__________________
OK to re-edit and repost photo(s) only on DPS forums Proud user of a Fuji FP S3100, Nikon P90, a Canon T3i, and persistence. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
peeper |
|
||||
|
Quote:
thanks for taking the time to critique this shot, jiminy.....yours is an opinion that i value greatly..... we began almost too late in the day....this shot was taken a little less than an hour before sunset in the deep wood....and the horse was not cooperating as well as my model would have liked....her girlfriend is just off frame in almost every shot cooing to him to behave....he twisted and turned almost constantly which made posing quite difficult....(you should see the stack of outtakes!) that outfit was great, wasn't it?.....when i first saw what she chose to wear i didn't like all the patterning and i was grateful that i had brought extra garb....i shot her in several gowns but, this one ended up appealing to me the most..... i have yet to present this woman with her portraits because i wanted the feedback that you and others so generously provide.....these critiques will enable me to go back through my editing and choose a better path as it relates to cropping, background and lighting...... thank you again, dear man.... peeper ps....if you have the time and the inclination to do so.....there's another shot on my flickr of them further away that has a sort of "rembrandt" lighting that i like...(although the focus was more than a challenge)... Last edited by peeperita; 11-13-2007 at 02:20 PM. |
|
||||
|
peeperita,
Usually I run short of time, and going to Flickr is a luxury I can't indulge. I should plan better so I can do it more often. 5789 is a more intimate view and illustrates the facing-inward quality well. 5801 is epic, like a Joan of Arc portrait. Better light quality, horse position dramatic (by comparison), background adds to it. Did your client like 5801?
__________________
OK to re-edit and repost photo(s) only on DPS forums Proud user of a Fuji FP S3100, Nikon P90, a Canon T3i, and persistence. |
|
||||
|
I think you did a nice job with the one you have shown us. As far as depth of field, you have a couple of options, not that any would have worked so well here with only onboard flash. As you get farther away, depth of field will increase for the same f/stop. Then you have to rely on the camera's ability to capture the shot with enough megapixels to crop the image you desire. Next, stopping the lens down and slowing the shutter speed will balance the ambient light but will also decrease the effect of the flash. The way to work it would be to see how close you would need to be for the chosen f/stop to work for depth of field and flash, then balance available light for that aperture with slowing the shutter speed. Not as easy a task in outdoor lighting. Fortunately the horse was light in tone so that would have helped, even if he came out a ittle darker. You need to put a more powerful battery powered flash on your Christmas wish list. 8-)
__________________
Sincerely, Lee -clockdoc- |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Each day we send out a quick email to thousands of DPS readers to notify them of updates. This email is just short excerpt of the first few lines of our latest post with a link if you want to read it all. You can unsubscribe from this this service at any time.
This service is provided by a third party (Feedburner) and you can subscribe to it by leaving your email address in the following field and confirming your subscription when you get an email asking you to do so.
Enter your email address for
Daily Updates:
For those wanting a weekly summary of what happens on this site this free email newsletter is probably your best option. It includes a summary of the tips posted to the site each week. This newsletter is subscribed to by over 25000 readers (many who also subscribe to the other options above) - come join the community!
To subscribe to this weekly newsletter simply add your email address to the following field and then follow the confirmation prompts. You will be able to unsubscribe at any time.
Enter your email address for
Free Weekly Newsletter: