#1 (permalink)  
Old 10-07-2007, 04:06 AM
Loves the moderation team!
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 118
Default interesting bark

I haven't done much black and white. Any comments appreciated.

bark
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 10-07-2007, 03:06 PM
xxpinballxx's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Cleveland Ohio
Posts: 4,010
Default

thats a wld pattern! As a B&W i think its a bit to much on the brighter side. The subject seems a bit "flat" to give any real dramatic shadows and highlights. I don't know much about B&W but love doing it and looking at what others have done. Seems to me that B&Ws are more suited to real scenes or settings. The abtract seems to lose something. is this a tree by you where you can shoot again? Did you crop this down alot to just focs on the pattern of the bark? I gotta say I never seen a tree that had this look to it....
__________________
D7000, D200, 18-105mm, 85mm 1.8, 60mm macro, 50mm 1.4, 18-200mm, 10-20mm, 105mm 2.8, sb600, sb900, Panasonic GF2 Samsung NX100 and lenses and a ton more crap!
RoundboyzPhotography on Flickr
RoundboyzPhotographyBlog
My Twitter
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 10-07-2007, 03:42 PM
windrider86's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Trinidad, Co
Posts: 15,518
Default

I agree that it is a very interesting pattern but it does lack contrast or something
__________________
Olympus user, Fuji E900, a canon & last but not least a Minolta 35mm and some really old large format box cameras.Not to mention a whole bunch of other stuff. Paint Shop Pro X3, CS3,CS5, Portrait Professional, Topaz Adjust, Lucis Art and the list goes on........
www.alockintime.com



Facebook
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 10-07-2007, 06:24 PM
Loves the moderation team!
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 118
Default

Hmm...here's the original shot:

IMG_1900

It didn't have much color, which is what made me want to convert it to B&W. But maybe it just doesn't have enough contrast to work as an abstract. Do you think shooting later in the afternoon to bring out more shadow would help?

For context, here's the original tree (bush? shrubbery?):

IMG_1910
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 10-08-2007, 02:31 AM
invu69's Avatar
Point & Shoot
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 45
Default

I think I like the colored pic better. Just crop out the right side a lil then light on the subject..
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 10-08-2007, 10:52 AM
Point & Shoot
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Wiltshire, UK
Posts: 18
Default

Hi,

Actually, I like the B&W version much more than the colour one.

Cheers

D.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 10-08-2007, 11:06 AM
matthewchj's Avatar
Super Zoom
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Singapore
Posts: 836
Default

Nice!!! I love the patterns. And yeah, the B&W is better.
__________________
Canon 350D, 18-55mm 3.5-5.6, 50mm 1.8, 100mm 2.8 Macro, 75-300mm 4-5.6, Sigma 10-20mm 4-5.6
flickr|Photoblog
A picture is a frozen slice of time painted on paper.
OK to edit and repost my shots on DPS
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 10-08-2007, 11:13 AM
subrataofkris's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Kolkata, India
Posts: 626
Default

Hi annie,

I love the way you identified the pattern in the bark, I liked the coloured version because the grey tone has increased the contrast a bit. If you avoid midday, mornings and late afternoons can give you interesting light and shade. Nice effort.
__________________
Subrata
Nikon D90, D50 18-55mm, 55-200mm, Tamron 90mm, SB600

It OK to edit my photographs
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 10-08-2007, 12:16 PM
wulf's Avatar
Ninja Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 9,667
Default

It makes me think of fish.

I like the black and white version but would want to increase the contrast, certainly making the highlights brighter and perhaps darkening the shadows. That would make it look "wetter", enhancing the piscine appearance.

I would also consider cropping or lightening the patch in the bottom right, which I find distracting - noticeable but too small and near the edge to work as a feature.

Wulf
__________________
Wulf Forrester-Barker << Sites: blog / flickr >>
Gear: Nikon D40, Nikon AFS 18-55mm f/3.5 - 5.6G, Nikon Series E 50mm f/1.8, Nikon AF 70-300mm f/4-5.6G, Vivitar 90mm f/2.5 macro, Raynox DCR-250, Lensbaby 2.0k, SB600
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

What’s Your Preference?

Daily Digest

Each day we send out a quick email to thousands of DPS readers to notify them of updates. This email is just short excerpt of the first few lines of our latest post with a link if you want to read it all. You can unsubscribe from this this service at any time.

This service is provided by a third party (Feedburner) and you can subscribe to it by leaving your email address in the following field and confirming your subscription when you get an email asking you to do so.

Enter your email address for
Daily Updates:

Weekly Summary

For those wanting a weekly summary of what happens on this site this free email newsletter is probably your best option. It includes a summary of the tips posted to the site each week. This newsletter is subscribed to by over 25000 readers (many who also subscribe to the other options above) - come join the community!

To subscribe to this weekly newsletter simply add your email address to the following field and then follow the confirmation prompts. You will be able to unsubscribe at any time.

Enter your email address for
Free Weekly Newsletter:

 
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.0