#1 (permalink)  
Old 09-01-2007, 06:25 PM
I'm new here!
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Dubai - UAE
Posts: 43
Default photo lacks luster

hi this is the photograph of my son. I used a 50MM lens with an apperture of 1.8. did some post production work in photoshop. but the image lacks lustre i think. Appreciate comments and tips to improve it further - do you think there is a need to sharpen the image? if yes pls. let me know how to achieve this in photoshop
Attached Images
File Type: jpg DSC_0052 5x7 copy.jpg (83.7 KB, 65 views)
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 09-01-2007, 08:10 PM
dPS +1000 Club
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Cozumel, Quintana Roo
Posts: 3,109
Default

It looks like you used a on camera flash pointed straight at him. This gives the image a very artificial light and makes his skin tones a little bluish. I would try adding a warming filter on photoshop to give his skin tones a more natural look. also clone out the arm of the person holding him. (at least I think it is an arm. that bit of black left of his ear) If you are going to reshoot or just for future shots in general try bouncing the flash off a reflector or using a diffuser if you have not other choice. Also be more aware of your background when you are shooting try to eliminate anything that can serve as a distraction from your subject.
__________________
Rex K

The view from my "office" doesn't suck.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 09-02-2007, 06:38 AM
I'm new here!
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Dubai - UAE
Posts: 43
Default

Thansk - you are absolutely rite - I did use an on camera flash directly pointed at him - I will try the warm filter

And yes it is an arm. i will clone it out

to be honest I always struggle with the falsh light - daylight always works for me much better
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 09-02-2007, 07:49 AM
wulf's Avatar
Ninja Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 9,828
Default

Try a slighly smaller aperture (larger number). Being wide open at f/1.8 is well and good for throwing the background out of focus but gives you a minimal depth of field, especially close to the subject. Even if you had caught the eyes, you might have had the nose still blurred!

Good composition though (especially the pensive finger in the mouth and the large amount of "negative space" to the right) - worth retaking.

Wulf
__________________
Wulf Forrester-Barker << Sites: blog / flickr >>
Gear: Nikon D40, Nikon AFS 18-55mm f/3.5 - 5.6G, Nikon Series E 50mm f/1.8, Nikon AF 70-300mm f/4-5.6G, Vivitar 90mm f/2.5 macro, Raynox DCR-250, Lensbaby 2.0k, SB600
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 09-02-2007, 08:12 AM
I'm new here!
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Dubai - UAE
Posts: 43
Default

thanks Wulf - I have conciously tried to keep the subject to the left of the frame - you mention "negative space" is that good or bad - appreciate a little explanation - thanks
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 09-02-2007, 01:24 PM
wulf's Avatar
Ninja Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 9,828
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hh28360 View Post
thanks Wulf - I have conciously tried to keep the subject to the left of the frame - you mention "negative space" is that good or bad - appreciate a little explanation - thanks
Negative space? It means empty space in the picture without much going on. If you have a deeply blurred area (the result of choosing a wide aperture), with no detail apparent, this is negative space.

The contrast is a picture where there is no empty space. Unless the subject is clearly dominant, the result can be that you are left unsure about what to focus on.

That is why negative space can be such an, er, positive thing!

Wulf
__________________
Wulf Forrester-Barker << Sites: blog / flickr >>
Gear: Nikon D40, Nikon AFS 18-55mm f/3.5 - 5.6G, Nikon Series E 50mm f/1.8, Nikon AF 70-300mm f/4-5.6G, Vivitar 90mm f/2.5 macro, Raynox DCR-250, Lensbaby 2.0k, SB600
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 09-05-2007, 06:19 AM
jiminyClickit's Avatar
Honorary Critique Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Fulton, NY
Posts: 11,047
Default

hh28360, Welcome

The background of your photo takes away some of the light in your son's countenance. A simple separation of these two into layers will allow you to blur/darken b/g separately. Then a little sharpening, contrast, saturation, balance of red and yellow will bring some more life into the skintones.

PortraitX
__________________
OK to re-edit and repost photo(s) only on DPS forums
Proud user of a Fuji FP S3100, Nikon P90, a Canon T3i, and persistence.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 09-05-2007, 09:15 AM
I'm new here!
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Dubai - UAE
Posts: 43
Default

jiminyClickit, Thanks very much - the image looks much better now - one question though - I have been struggling with making accurate selections to be able to separate the background from the main image. What were the photoshop tools you used to make such an accurate selction? A little education on separating the bkground and main image into two layers will be greatly appreciated
thanks
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 09-05-2007, 05:01 PM
dPS +1000 Club
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Cozumel, Quintana Roo
Posts: 3,109
Default

I think the cleanest way to do it is the use a layer mask that way you can just paint over what you want selected. the different tools like magic lasso and what not are fast but give sketchy results.
__________________
Rex K

The view from my "office" doesn't suck.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 09-06-2007, 07:40 AM
jiminyClickit's Avatar
Honorary Critique Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Fulton, NY
Posts: 11,047
Default

hh28360,

Adobe PhotoDeluxe is an older edit program, using more intuitive functions and language. The first tool I use (on a copy layer of original) is Trace (Select), to remove (Delete) sections of background while zoomed in. It's fast, and leaves just a little bit to Erase with a small brush. When subject has a clean believable edge, I place it on top of a second layer (copy of original) which has been darkened and blurred. If your blur spills out beyond top layer of subject, you can Smudge the offending colors back under subject layer (like sweeping crumbs under a carpet) with a large brush.
__________________
OK to re-edit and repost photo(s) only on DPS forums
Proud user of a Fuji FP S3100, Nikon P90, a Canon T3i, and persistence.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

What’s Your Preference?

Daily Digest

Each day we send out a quick email to thousands of DPS readers to notify them of updates. This email is just short excerpt of the first few lines of our latest post with a link if you want to read it all. You can unsubscribe from this this service at any time.

This service is provided by a third party (Feedburner) and you can subscribe to it by leaving your email address in the following field and confirming your subscription when you get an email asking you to do so.

Enter your email address for
Daily Updates:

Weekly Summary

For those wanting a weekly summary of what happens on this site this free email newsletter is probably your best option. It includes a summary of the tips posted to the site each week. This newsletter is subscribed to by over 25000 readers (many who also subscribe to the other options above) - come join the community!

To subscribe to this weekly newsletter simply add your email address to the following field and then follow the confirmation prompts. You will be able to unsubscribe at any time.

Enter your email address for
Free Weekly Newsletter:

 
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.0