Subscription Options
Join Over 871,000 Subscribers
07-20-2007, 12:39 AM
|
||||
|
||||
First one has much more character and interest. B&W just doesn't do it here. Ithink the shadows add alot too. I really like the first one and the other two just look flat in comparison.
__________________
D7000, D200, 18-105mm, 35mm 1.8, 85mm 1.8, 50mm 1.8G, 18-200mm, 10-20mm, 105mm 2.8, sb900, Panasonic GF2 Samsung NX100 and lenses and a ton more crap! RoundboyzPhotography on Flickr RoundboyzPhotographyBlog My Twitter 
|
|
07-20-2007, 02:12 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
ToddC,
Not a fair comparison: B is a better crop for hand, and shows detail of eye better. It's also turned a few degrees further away from camera, and lit lower on the right side. A is dramatic, C is a B/W photo. Which is better depends on how you intend to use them.
__________________
OK to re-edit and repost photo(s) only on DPS forums Proud user of a Fuji FP S3100, Nikon P90, a Canon T3i, and persistence.
|
|
07-20-2007, 12:08 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Having just left the Strobist's site, I would have guessed you were experimenting with flash placement. As the others have said, it is a matter of personal preference as the first two each have merit, depending on what you were trying to achieve. At first glance my vote would have been for the first one.
__________________
Sincerely, Lee -clockdoc-
|
|
07-20-2007, 12:40 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
lighting is more interesting in #1
|
|
07-20-2007, 02:40 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Definitly the first one, for B&W you need to up the contrast not just desaturate and leave it.
__________________
Flickr Portfolio Blog Canon EOS350D Canon EF-S 18-55mm 1:3.5-5.6 II | Canon EF-S 60mm 1:2.8 USM | Canon EF 50mm 1:1.8 II | Canon EF-S 55-250mm 1:4-5.6
|
 |
| Bookmarks |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
Linear Mode
|
|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.