Quote:
Originally Posted by thebubblybeginner
I'm curious. I always understood bokeh to be the out of focus points of light in a photo (wikipedia....Essentially, bokeh is an aesthetic and qualitative measure of light distortion in the out-of-focus areas of an image, and is primarily caused by lens aberrations and aperture shape.)
I read the links Saralonde has posted here and noticed the one that is "understanding boke" seems different (...the difference between out of focus areas of an image due to lens design).
My question, lol..... is it JUST any out-of-focus areas in a photo or is it the soft, blurred, out-of-focus, lights or both? If it's any out-of-focus area, what makes one more desirable than something else? Just wanna make sure I understand this 
|
Typically, bokeh pictures show points of light, which expand to funky blobs of colour. However, I think the term can be understood more widely than that to mean any side-effect of the lens which yields interesting textures and patterns in out of focus areas. For example, if you look at the image below, there aren't any strong points of light but my Vivitar lens created a fascinating effect in the background:
Of course, that still doesn't make the overall picture brilliant. It would have helped if the hen were in sharper focus and not just randomly positioned at the bottom of the frame. Try and come up with pictures where the optical side-effects in the blurred portions of the image enhance the overall effect. If you want to excel, don't be content to present a picture that has what could be described as bokeh; use bokeh as a key element in a fantastic and captivating image!
Wulf