PDA

View Full Version : Coastline


wulf
12-29-2006, 09:00 AM
Here is the before shot:

http://farm1.static.flickr.com/125/335314357_a6a3841f83.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/wulf/335314357/)

That is on the North Cornwall coast in South West England. The challenge was a generally overcast day with a patch of bright sunlight in the distance. As you can see, I chose to expose for the sky in this shot (and did a companion where I exposed for the foreground).

Here is the after version:

http://farm1.static.flickr.com/136/335348253_97f32868e9.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/wulf/335348253/)

I have made two major changes:

1. I recently discovered a very easy way of bringing out detail in dark areas without destroying lighter sections of a picture. Create a duplicate layer, desaturate the colours, invert the image to a white and black "negative" and then set the layer to "overlay" mode. The darker the original pixel, the lighter its counterpart in the new layer and thus the more it is affected. At this stage, I also did a little bit of colour balance work to make the result slightly warmer.

2. Cropping the image. On the original, you'll notice a blob about half way up, near the left hand edge. This was a tiny splash of water I had picked up while nearer the sea, which I didn't notice until looking at the photos on the computer. It was more noticeable on the lightened version so I have cropped the image down to exclude it. I also wanted to put it in a 16:9 widescreen ratio for cinematic effect and found that I could do that while keeping all the points of interest. I first determined my maximum width (to avoid the blob) then divided by 16 and multiplied by 9 to determine the appropriate height to match; that gave me a crop window that I could then move around until I had framed the image the way I wanted.

Overall, I think the final result is successful and certainly a much improved image over the original.

Wulf

z999
12-29-2006, 11:43 PM
HDR
you should have made this photo an HDR instead of destroying it. it isn't, good what you did. it just looks lik a mistake leave it how it was.

googlit
12-30-2006, 01:11 AM
that's not the most constructive criticism I've ever heard...

I think you did a good job of pulling some of the detail back out of the foreground. I might do just what you did, but mask out the sky & water in the overlay layer (I like the background a little better as-is) and bring the opacity down to about 50% or so.

hitkaiser
12-30-2006, 02:43 AM
Nice tip

The hazy hill on the left, is it meant to look like that? That little section doesnt look very appealing to me

JimP
01-01-2007, 05:05 PM
Wulf

I like your after shot.

Your technique at para 1 is interesting. I am going to have a go at that.

wulf
01-01-2007, 06:21 PM
The hazy hill on the left, is it meant to look like that? That little section doesnt look very appealing to me
It's a little on the light side, although I was trying to bring out a misty, ethereal quality in the image. Even in the original, it looks a bit hazy - I could have done with another, slightly better exposed shot (I did take one but it was too far on the other side)... in my defence, it was only my second day out with the new camera so I was still trying to get to grip with the controls :)

Wulf