View Full Version : Qualities for a "Landscape pic."
Lastoadri
12-17-2006, 10:18 AM
To me, all pictures about nature are nice. However, can you tell me, what qualities one should take care of to have a good "landscape picture"? How can you tell this one is good and this one is not?!
Nicole
12-17-2006, 10:48 AM
I've thought about this question quite a bit, and found myself struggling to determine what I think makes a good landscape shot rather than a bad one. I think that landscapes are something that appeals to a gut reaction most of the time because of the feeling they evoke. It may be a feeling of calmness or trepidation, but it usually inspires a feeling. This makes it hard to determine what makes something good or not because it's so personal.
That being said, I think that one of the things that can make a landscape shot better is the illusion of depth within the photo. Something that makes the picture not so "flat". For example, green grass against a blue sky may be a nice image, but it's also "flat". In contrast, if a tree were added to the picture, it may create the illusion of more depth because you feel there is distance between you and the tree, and the tree and the horizon.
Not sure how much sense that makes though :p
henryscat
01-06-2007, 12:18 PM
I'm always looking for a good foreground subject to sit with a nice landscape. Gives a much better sense of depth. I'm also a big fan of using a wide angle lens in portrait and getting some of the ground at your feet in the shot too. I love this technique with water and rocks.
Digidave
01-11-2007, 11:41 PM
Here's a picture I submitted for critiquing. I love this picture! I thought it had just the right amount of sky, water, & land. Nice colors along with some rock formations. I only got 2 critiques. 1 was bad & 1 was sort of good. You decide.;) To each his own, I guess.:cool:
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/digidave/348172059/" title="Photo Sharing"><img src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/139/348172059_569f5ab4cf.jpg" width="500" height="333" alt="Devil's Lake State Park" /></a>
Merlyn
01-12-2007, 12:23 AM
Nothing going on in the sky, such as clouds to help give the sky some purpose. A little less of your sky may help. A polarizer or neutral density filter may help here also to bring the color of the sky up to that of the water.
The image is also weighted a little on the left. Looks as if the lake is higher on the right. In photoshop it shows up as being about 11 Degrees off.
Like everyone else, keep taking pictures, the perfect one is out there somewhere.
Saralonde
01-12-2007, 12:33 AM
I like landscapes that have some type of focal point, a subject that draws your eye to it. Could be a boat, reflections, interesting clouds, tree, colors, etc.
msafiedin
01-14-2007, 09:43 PM
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/ampin/342853507/" title="Photo Sharing"><img src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/135/342853507_01b596af21.jpg" width="500" height="333" alt="Fly like me 2" /></a>
how about this one...? i took it few weeks ago
still learning about my d40..
Nicole
01-14-2007, 10:01 PM
msafiedin: I really like that shot of yours. I like how the sky is reflected on the water on the sand, and the birds really draw your eye to the centre of the shot. Well done.
msafiedin
01-14-2007, 10:03 PM
thats a lot of compliment from moderator
i have only start learning photography like few weeks back..
after i saved money to buy the d40
thanks nicole..appreciate it..
sagelike31
01-14-2007, 10:37 PM
Some great thoughts here.
I guess my only additions to that are to shoot a landscape shot when no one else would. Basically try to avoid the generic sunny shot capture. And when you do that of course make sure it looks good.
And the overall rule to make sure your landscape photos look professional is
KEEP THE HORIZON STRAIGHT!!!!!!
If you don't it looks like a snapshot.
Here is one of my best examples of that:
http://i137.photobucket.com/albums/q207/sagevarious/Light11.jpg
beckywithasmile
01-15-2007, 10:03 AM
One of the biggest mistakes I see in landscape photography is in framing. I have seen many, many photos, where people have trees in the way of half of their shot. Either find a way to use the tree (or other item) to fram your shot so it looks nice or take a few steps one way or another and get it out of the shot. This is kind of a pet peeve of mine because it really distracts from what could otherwise be an absolutely wonderful photo.
hsroxas
01-19-2007, 04:05 AM
Hi msafiedin!
For someone still learning his new gear, you are a "natural", meaning you've got the touch.
Keep on shooting.
purplebyron
03-30-2007, 06:15 PM
well its a massive question and i guess the answer if formulaic would make every landscape picture a hit ... i am about to ramble on about ideas etc and opinions in a roundabout sort of way, which leads me to my first attempt to what makes a good landscape pic .... i believe it has something to do with a journey for the eye and mind in the way of an effortless fly through of interest and twisting and turning of ideas and thoughts, a kind of mini holiday for the eye, i believe the image on the first moment of viewing should be easily accessible and then once in, the viewer must be led around like a kid in a sweet shop by interesting line, form, colours and textures also the image must be more than the sum of its parts........ ok this might be just the makings of a good landscape picture or indeed might include just a few of the criteria i have listed, but i still think the excellent landscape pic transcends everything ...it is and always will be a moment that elevates an interesting place and moment into an almost spiritual, fantasy land that will seriously enlighten the viewer, this can only be possible by some magical moment in time ... its funny how most excellent landscapes are most often taken around transistional times of day where lighting is unpredictable and inspirational, by this i mean by an example of dawn, dusk, moonlight or perhaps a storm ... a situation where the uncommon, moving, sinister etc can be revealed through the above list
i dont want to fall into the trap of going intothe old master painters and getting bogged down by the picturesque and the sublime and the inclusion that every painting has to have a mountain , three cows, a farm labourer of some kind etc etc .. we could study a classic lanscape scene and ponder its qualities till the preverbial three cows come home but i think it is just a magic moment in time seen and realised .. but able to talk and allow access to a third party view ... how difficult it is to seperate the magical moment of taking a picture that has so much sentiment for the photographer and to convey this to the viewer ......... have i been able to do this .... absolutely not .... am i an accomplished landscape photographer .... absolutely not ... but one day maybe i will be walking at a special place at a special time and have a camera ready with a tripod and realise -through and with the aid of all the failed attempts so far- a good landscape image that i and others will enjoy
i might just add that there are some things, like thirds that might be considered as important factors in composition, but to state this as fact is fool hardy and wrong ... filters/ neutral density and polarizers are helpful but again to state that these are absolute would be just plain wrong, But i would say that copying and looking at other landscape artists work can only better ones attempt at the arcadian visual dream .
wijew
04-27-2007, 01:29 AM
Sagelike31,
Another point I'd like to draw peoples attention to regarding your photograph is how you have "balanced" the image. Notice how the "Bigger" pylon, which is closer to the middle of the picture, is balanced by the "Smaller" pylon which is further away from the picture? I think it adds a lot to landscape images but obviously it is not a rule which can be used with every landscape photograph.
I think the rule of thirds and keeping horizons horizontal are two rules which can be used more frequently.
Griggs
05-02-2007, 10:05 AM
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/ampin/342853507/" title="Photo Sharing"><img src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/135/342853507_01b596af21.jpg" width="500" height="333" alt="Fly like me 2" /></a>
how about this one...? i took it few weeks ago
still learning about my d40..
If you straighten out the horizon, it looks a just a little off and center the birds in the shot, looks a little to the left, then that looks like a picture I'd buy!
stevesutt89
05-05-2007, 12:18 PM
I have a theory on why i like this shot so much....it may be completely wrong, but i'll give it a go anyway.
When you look at the sky, there are two gaps in the clouds that kind of make two lines (or vectors) which converge at the flock of birds. These lines are reflected in the water so that the whole image has a kind of "X" on it. What makes this so good is that no matter where you start looking at this image your eyes will always be drawn along the vectors to the birds, the main point of interest. Or, if starting at the birds, they will be drawn outwards to the rest of the image.
The other thing i think that the lines in the clouds do is to help to add perspective. Its kind of like train tracks disappearing into the distance, and this gives a feeling of depth. Which brings me to my comment on landscapes in general: If you have some sort of object in the foreground which draws the viewers eyes into the image, a landscape picture may be greatly enhanced.
Now there was an article about that somewhere on this site...where was it...?
This is not the one i was thinking of, but here's one about "how to use converging lines to enhance your landscape photography (http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/converging-lines/).
Ahhh, and the one I was looking for..."How to get foregrounds right in photography" (http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/foregrounds-in-photography/)
ram1945
05-06-2007, 02:57 PM
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/picrick/466189194/" title="Photo Sharing"><img src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/177/466189194_3430ea8795_m.jpg" width="240" height="180" alt="Morning Sun" /></a>
I shot this one morning in our wooded area. I thought the Sun's rays shining through the trees defined a pathway. I had never noticed this in the same prospective as I did this particular morning.
Hemant Anand
05-06-2007, 08:27 PM
To me a good Landscape picture is when you forget about everything else for a moment and just look at it.
Nikon D80
Tamron: 18-200
Nicole
05-06-2007, 09:15 PM
Welcome Hemand Anand :)
Great thoughts on what a good landscape is, and you've provided an excellent example :)
vBulletin® v3.7.3, Copyright ©2000-2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.