Dragon Flies, Butterflies And Insects

[sourabhdasimages]

Hello All,

Please review these photographs.

1.


Exif Data

Camera Kodak Easyshare Z1015IS
X-Resolution 171 dpi
Y-Resolution 171 dpi
Orientation Horizontal (normal)
Software Adobe Photoshop CS Windows
Date and Time (Modified) 2010:10:25 20:50:24
YCbCr Positioning Centered
Padding (Binary data 2060 bytes, use -b option to extract)
Color Space sRGB
Custom Rendered Custom
Padding (Binary data 2060 bytes, use -b option to extract)
Compression JPEG (old-style)
Global Angle 30
Global Altitude 30
Copyright Flag False
Photoshop Quality 12
Photoshop Format Progressive
Progressive Scans 3 Scans
XMPToolkit XMP toolkit 3.0-28, framework 1.6
About uuid:4148fa7b-e04b-11df-8d25-95544e3f8d91
Orientation Horizontal (normal)
Metadata Date 2010:10:25 20:50:24+05:30
Creator Tool Adobe Photoshop CS Windows
Format image/jpeg
Viewing Conditions Illuminant Type D50
Measurement Observer CIE 1931
Measurement Flare 0.999%
Measurement Illuminant D65
Color Transform YCbCr
----------
Regards,
Sourabh.

[Laurenbiz]

Critique Forum Rules

[sourabhdasimages]

Originally Posted by Laurenbiz

Critique Forum Rules

Thank you lauren.. I read the rule this time.
So I can post 1 thread in every section each day .. right.. ? like I can post 4 different photos in share your photos and 4 other photos in ciritque section ... right..?

[sourabhdasimages]

Originally Posted by Laurenbiz

Critique Forum Rules

Hi Lauren,

I have done the needful. I have removed the 3 images.
Can you please clarify my doubt that I posted in previous message :
So I can post 1 thread in every section each day .. right.. ? like I can post 4 different photos in share your photos and 1 other photos in ciritque section ... right..?

[RecurrentNerve]

No, you can post 1 thread in SYS and 1 thread in Critique, 1 photo in each. So 2 photos a day.

[tingeliM]

you still need to add the EXIF data and tell people specific things you want critiqued.
It's all in the rules. Is there something there that you don't understand? Please let us know and we'll help to clarify.

[sourabhdasimages]

Originally Posted by tingeliM

you still need to add the EXIF data and tell people specific things you want critiqued.
It's all in the rules. Is there something there that you don't understand? Please let us know and we'll help to clarify.

Hi,

I dont mind adding the exif info here also, just a factor of Copy and Paste, but dont you think its already available in flickr? So space will be saved here.

[tingeliM]

Originally Posted by sourabh.das.images

Hi,

I dont mind adding the exif info here also, just a factor of Copy and Paste, but dont you think its already available in flickr? So space will be saved here.

So you think the guidelines are everyone but you? Most people definitely don't care enough to go check the EXIF from another site in order to help you. And they can't help you if you don't add the specific questions. Is this really that hard for you?

Plus the EXIF you added isn't relevant at all. What it means is shutter speed, aperture, ISO, flash or not etc.
Go look at other people's posts to see how it's done right.

[sourabhdasimages]

Originally Posted by tingeliM

Plus the EXIF you added isn't relevant at all. What it means is shutter speed, aperture, ISO, flash or not etc.

the thing that you demanded helped me to learn one more thing. Every image that I have taken in .jpg format, the characteristics you mentioned are available. But every image that i have taken in RAW mode do not have those data. How do I get that?

[tingeliM]

Originally Posted by sourabh.das.images

the thing that you demanded helped me to learn one more thing. Every image that I have taken in .jpg format, the characteristics you mentioned are available. But every image that i have taken in RAW mode do not have those data. How do I get that?

Someone who knows more about shooting in RAW can correct me if I'm wrong, but I really don't believe that RAW-photos don't save the basic EXIF data.
I suspect that they go missing after you edit your photos and frame them. I've had that happen once or twice back in the day when I tried framing a couple of shots (nowadays I feel that large frames only distract the viewer from the actual photo and make the image look very cheap) .
Check the originals instead of the edited ones (I hope you always keep the originals and only edit the copies). If you're a windows user, you'll see the data when you click right on the photo and choose Properties.