Subscription Options
Join Over 871,000 Subscribers
01-30-2010, 09:35 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Sunbathing After Nap
My main question on this picture is about the crop. Should I have not cropped so close or is this good?
 Camera Model: Canon PowerShot SX10 IS Focal Length: 100.0mm (35mm equivalent: 749... Exposure Time: 0.0025 s (1/400) Aperture: f/5.7 ISO Equiv.: 80 
|
|
01-31-2010, 06:59 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Did you crop the front paws out?
|
|
01-31-2010, 09:51 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Yeah I agree, would have been nice to see the paws if possible.
__________________
Nikon D50/D300S | Nikon 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6G AFS DX | Nikon 85mmf1.8D AF | Nikon 50mmf1.8D AF | Sigma 70-300mm f/4-5.6 DG Macro | Nikon 70-300mm f4.5-5.6G IF-ED AFS VR DeviantArt gallery Flickr
|
|
01-31-2010, 09:55 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Without the crop the paws were cut off half way so I had to crop them all the way.
|
|
01-31-2010, 10:05 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I think I would have attempted an even tighter crop around the face maybe then.
__________________
Nikon D50/D300S | Nikon 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6G AFS DX | Nikon 85mmf1.8D AF | Nikon 50mmf1.8D AF | Sigma 70-300mm f/4-5.6 DG Macro | Nikon 70-300mm f4.5-5.6G IF-ED AFS VR DeviantArt gallery Flickr
|
|
02-01-2010, 01:18 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
agreeing
I agree with Fremlin. If half a paw, then better of no paw at all.
|
|
02-02-2010, 04:55 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Here is the picture before cropping. There really is much of a paw at all.
|
 |
| Bookmarks |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
Linear Mode
|
|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.