View Single Post
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 12-25-2009, 09:52 PM
delgadina delgadina is offline
I'm new here!
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 36
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hartzler View Post
Delgadina,

Both versions have interest. In the larger Flickr versions, you see much more detail in each version.

I felt the first version is better exposed for the lamp itself. You see more bulb detail. I felt the colors of the wall right around the lamp had a bit more richness of color (but this was subtle). In the second version, you exposed more for the wall and surrounding darker areas, thus blowing out the light of the lamp a bit and overexposing the wall right next to the lamp a shade (but having better exposure as to the molding and parts of the wall farther away from the lamp).

It's a tough situation to get the exposure just right, you have the very bright lamp next to the dark shading of the doorway and wall details.There are post-processing tricks you can do to preserve the detail in both the lamp and the door especially if you shoot in RAW.

I liked the composition of the second a bit more, because the angle seemed to show me more detail in the sconce and lamp. But it wasn't a slam dunk for me, both versions hold interest.

Thanks for sharing.

Mark
Thank you for your thought and insight! You worded out the same points that I liked about the first picture, which, for some reason, I couldn't articulate properly at the time of posting. Haha! Thank you once again! I'll keep that in mind.
__________________
tumblr | flickr
Reply With Quote