View Single Post
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 11-29-2007, 05:55 AM
GEli's Avatar
GEli GEli is offline
dPS Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Posts: 593
Default

I don't think this is a great choice for a walk-around lens, particularly if space is a big issue. With space being an issue, I'm assuming you aren't going to have a tripod on you when you're walking around with this lens. I also know that with a lens this slow, extended fully you will definitely need one to get any sort of useable image. This is assuming the lens is perfect aside from this aforementioned problem -reviews seem to indicate this is not at all the case.

Might you consider a slightly shorter zoom (both range and minimum length)? The Pentax DA 50-135mm f/2.8 is a really nice lens, though slightly more expensive (~$900 USD). If you're looking for something cheaper, the Pentax 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 is actually a really well built lens for a kit lens, and really reasonably priced. If you were willing to buy two lenses, you could use this as your walking around lens and get a separate, longer telephoto zoom (or even a telephoto prime!) for special occasions when you have access to a tripod and want to do some work with a longer lens, all while remaining within a reasonable budget.
__________________
Digital: Canon 1DMkii, EF 17-40mm f/4 L, EF 50mm f/1.4, EF 85mm f/1.8
Film: Pentax LX, Pentax FA 50mm f/1.4, Pentax A 70-210 f/4, Pentax A 28mm f/2.8, Vivitar 2x Teleconverter, Vivitar 285HV
my flickr page
Reply With Quote