View Single Post
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 11-05-2009, 04:19 AM
natek313's Avatar
natek313 natek313 is offline
Loves the moderation team!
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 836
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jill H View Post
thanks Natek. I would probably be using the macro quite a lot outside - in the bush ie forest, wilderness areas, walk trails, remote area etc etc, where I might not want to carry a tripod or it might be inconvenient to set up (I know I should be!). So in those cases image stabilisation would be good?
Perhaps. To be honest, I've not tried to get 1:1 or 1:2 macro images with hand-holding the camera. At such short working distances and a 100mm focal length, slight hand movement is magnified significantly, which could easily lead to soft photographs. I'm not sure if the image stabilization would provide enough cushion. I'm not saying it can't. I'm saying I just don't know.

When I've used my 100mm macro for non-macro photographs, I've been able to get by just fine without image stabilization.
__________________
Flickr
Model Mayhem - I'd love to work with you!
Twitter - Follow me!
facebook - Become my fan!
Reply With Quote