It seems to get mixed reviews but I think that is sort of based on each individuals standards. Someone shooting a D3 who is used to shooting a 70-200 f/2.8 might pick it up for a vacation or something and say that it is horrible because they are used to pro glass. On the other side, someone who just has a kit lens might pick it up and find that its the best thing since sliced bread. The general consensus seems to be that it is a good value but to know of its shortcomings and understand that at $200 your not getting pro grade. From what I have read it works great in good light and focuses well when there is enough contrast. Also, the macro is 1:2, not true macro which is 1:1. Autofocus can be slow and hunt a bit if the light is low and/or is there is not enough contrast i subjects. Btw, I do not own this lens (yet) this is just a summary of the research i have done over the past few months. It seems to be a good value to me and I think ill give it a shot when finances allow. Good luck and I look forward to hearing more from people with real world experience with the lens.
|