View Single Post
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 11-02-2009, 11:17 AM
radityopradipto radityopradipto is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 153
Default

Personally, I think 35 and 50 serve different purposes... 35 is a bit too wide for me for shooting portrait, that's why I prefer 50 for portrait. But that's really depends on what you're shooting anyway... Having both are a privilege, and you can do it if your budget will allow you to.

I love prime lens. They are really sharp and the "feet factor" is not a problem to me.. But sometimes I missed zoom lenses because they provide VR/IS/VC or whatever they called it... It's really helpful..
__________________
Nikon D90 - Nikkor AF-S 17-55 F/2.8 DX - Nikkor 50 AF-1.4D
Tokina 11-16 F/2.8, Nikkor AF-S 70-200 F/2.8 VR2 & Nikkor 18-200 F/3.5-5.6

Portfolio: www.radityopradipto.zenfolio.com
Reply With Quote