View Single Post
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 10-20-2009, 03:40 PM
vandergus's Avatar
vandergus vandergus is offline
Person
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Grand Rapids, MI, USA
Posts: 1,088
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OsmosisStudios View Post
I'll wait and see what the Canon 102,400 ISO looks like. Nikon's is rough (useable, but rough), and thats at a considerably lower resolution.
And more importantly, and larger sensor. Wonder why Canon decided to go with the APS-H sensor instead of a 35mm sensor.
__________________
flickr
Why I Like Photographs

"It's more expensive, but it lets me adjust really specific settings that most people don't notice or think about." - Abed
Reply With Quote