Quote:
Originally Posted by wulf
It should be a .nef file. One of the complications will be that RAW formats are often quite camera specific.
I know that editing is quite subjective. What I'm interested in is whether any of the suggested edits offer an appreciable advance on what I can get from the JPEG version. For example, I think RLucas's version is too oversaturated for my tastes but I reckon I could replicate that if I wanted (and I appreciate him taking the time to show how he would work it). However, he does seem to have a bit more detail round the headlight area.
Another thing that is potentially interesting is to see the range of results that can be drawn out from the "digital negative".
Wulf
|
Wow! It is oversaturated! I am at work right now, on a different monitor. It may be that I had to resize it to post on here? I don't know.
I don't know, but most raw converters should open NEF files. I used Capture NX2 on this, but I also use UFRAW, and Gimp quite regularly. I have always been able to open them just fine with those as well.
Good luck with the research. I am interested as well.
Luke