View Single Post
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 10-03-2009, 01:44 PM
daft_biker's Avatar
daft_biker daft_biker is offline
dPS +1000 Club
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Edinburgh
Posts: 1,035
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CJWilkes View Post
My macro lens is the 60mm Nikon f/2.8 ED There is no comparison! I love it! If I wanted to get closer I would get the 100mm. I would also like to open up to f/1.8.
No comparison? Would like f/1.8? Checkout the Tamron 60mm f/2 macro

The "100mm" I assume you refer to is the Nikkor 105mm micro? That will not get you any closer than your 60mm as both lenses have a maximimun magnification of 1:1. The longer lens achieves the same magnification but gives you more working distance (the space between the lens and the subject).

If you like a lot of space between you and your subject then there are even longer macro lenses available - 180mm for Canon and 200mm for Nikon. The longer lenses are more expensive but are popular choices if you like photographing easily spooked insects such as butterflies and dragonflies. Longer lenses also have a narrower angle of view and tend to have more aperture blades so give the best bokeh (the out of focus areas).

Have another pic from my 100mm
__________________
Andrew - My pics on Flickr
Canon 7D, 24mm f/2.8, 50mm f/1.4, MP-E 65mm macro, TS-E 90mm, 100mm macro
Reply With Quote